The Memory Articles
- Tight Timings vs High Clock Frequencies
- Navigating the Memory Upgrade Jungle
- In Search of True DDR2 Bleeding Edge Memory
- How Much RAM Do You Really Need?
- The GeIL CL 1.5 DDR600 RAM Promise
- Pushing Your DDR2 RAM To The Max
- Separating The Wheat from the Chaff: The Latest DDR2 Modules Tested
- Corsair Reveals Xpert Memory Line: Speed with Sizzle
- Corsair In The Fast Lane: DDR2-667 and DDR400 With Extreme Timing
- THG Puts 13 Bleeding-Edge Memory Modules, 14 Mobos To the Match-Up...
Update 5: Samsung DDR2-667 Retail Memory Outperforms Test Sample by 14%
12:41 PM - April 11, 2006 by
Bert Töpelt
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: live, memory, test
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: live, memory, test
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
Update 5: Samsung DDR2-667 Retail Memory Outperforms Test Sample by 14%
The results of the Samsung stress test are amazing: Both the retail bought memory and the review samples are labeled „CN M378T6553CZ3-CE6", but one of them did considerable better than the other: The retail memory outperformed the review sample by 14%, or 421 MHz versus 361 MHz. This is the largest difference we've observed, and it is the opposite outcome than we had expected.

This is the statistic diagram for the retail bought Samsung memory.

This diagram shows the stress test history for the review samples from Samsung.
Both systems began the iterative stress testing at 10:31 am CET (1:31 am PST). Our system that was equipped with the Samsung review samples crashed at 9:07 pm CET, while the retail bought memory stayed on course until 4:03 pm the next day!
- Previous page Even More Stress Test Details
- Next page The Memory Gigahertz Race: A-Data vs....