|
HDT-S1283 CPU Cooler |
Compare the top 5 lowest prices by hovering your mouse over the product names on the left |
$36.99 |
|
Freezer 7 Pro CPU Heatsink | $36.99 | |
|
CNPS9700 LED CPU Cooler | $69.99 | |
|
CL-P0401 V1 CPU Cooler | $69.99 | |
|
Zalman CNPS9500 AM2 CPU Cooler | $55.99 |
- The AMD and Intel Energy Crisis
- Athlon 64 FX-57: Great Performance, High Price
- Dual Core Stress Test: AMD vs. Intel
- Dothan Over Netburst: Is The Pentium 4 A Dead End?
- AMD's Dual Core Athlon 64 X2 Strikes Hard
- The Pentium D: Intel's Dual Core Silver Bullet Previewed
- Prescott Reworked: The P4 600 Series and Extreme Edition 3.73 GHz
- Fast Computer On The Cheap? The Sempron 3100+ On Overdrive
- The Mother of All CPU Charts Part 2
- The Mother of All CPU Charts Part 1
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: live, stress, test, rundown
Topics: INTEL
Syndication:
Rundown Of The Live Stress Test: AMD Vs. Intel
For 18 days, THG readers were able to follow the duel between AMD and Intel as another live stress test examined the latest system platforms from the two chipmakers. Pitted against each were the fastest available processors from both manufacturers.
The AMD system featured the Dresden-manufactured 90 nm Athlon 64 X2 4800+, which consists of two FX-53 cores each running at 2.4 GHz with 1 MB L2 cache. The processor understands new command extensions; in addition to SSE and SSE2, it now supports SSE3 as well. This should make its effects felt in applications using video encoding.
Its opponent was the Intel Pentium 840 EE, which sports two type 540 Pentium 4 cores. They are both clocked at 3.2 GHz and fitted with a 1 MB L2 cache. Based purely on clock speed, the double-core processor from Intel suggests more performance. But even Intel no longer speaks of clock speed, preferring to use code numbers.
- Next page Overall Performance
