Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Flash Performance Benchmarks

Web Browser Grand Prix VIII: Chrome 16, Firefox 9, And Mac OS X
By

GUIMark 2 Flash

All of the Windows 7 browsers appear to have steady scores with no browser showing an abnormal weakness in any of the three HTML5 implementations.

Firefox and Chrome for OS X both seem to have an advantage in vector charting, while Firefox also shows a strength in text columns.

Once again, Opera, Safari, and IE9 all place close together at the top of the pile in this Windows 7-based test.

Opera places first with 41.5 FPS, followed by Safari with 40.5 FPS, and IE9 with 39.5 FPS. Firefox comes in fourth place at 35 FPS, while Chrome takes last place with 32 FPS.

Mozilla grabs the lead in OS X with 33 FPS, followed by Chrome with 32 FPS. Safari takes third at 30.5 FPS and Opera brings up the rear at 29.5 FPS. All of the browsers do worse in OS X than in Windows.

Flash Benchmark 2008

Safari takes the lead in Windows 7 by a decent margin over second-place finisher IE9. Opera pulls into third, followed by Firefox in fourth and Chrome in fifth.

The OS X placing changes significantly, as the last-place finisher in Windows 7, Firefox, takes the Apple gold. Safari takes a hit on its native platform to come in a very close second, though, trailed by Chrome (which also enjoys a benefit over the Windows version). Opera comes in last place, not far behind Chrome, but very far behind its Windows 7 score.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 152 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 21 Hide
    twztechman , January 6, 2012 3:58 AM
    Been using Firefox for years - it works best for me.
  • 10 Hide
    Anonymous , January 6, 2012 5:42 AM
    Nobody else seems to have noticed that this article tries to rate browsers by speed differences that are far less than the blink of an eye. A browser is a tool - just use the ones you want and stop bothering people about their own choices. (I keep two or three loaded on my machine in case one of them has an issue with a particular webpage)
Other Comments
  • 21 Hide
    twztechman , January 6, 2012 3:58 AM
    Been using Firefox for years - it works best for me.
  • -1 Hide
    shiftmx112 , January 6, 2012 4:24 AM
    This makes it worth putting up with the constant updates on Aurora. :) 
  • 9 Hide
    Anonymous , January 6, 2012 4:30 AM
    The best part is I'm quite sure that this is using an out of the box build. Using a PGO compiled nighlty build, with about:config properly configured, and addons like Adblock/NoScript blocking things from ever loading Firefox is significantly faster than these benchmarks state.
  • 2 Hide
    frost_fenix , January 6, 2012 4:40 AM
    I have use firefox and chrome interchangeably for a few years now. I enjoy chromes streamlined design but have recently discovered the noscript addon for Firefox and have since favored Firefox. I have also found Firefox to be more compatable with school webpages and application pages. Still either firefox or chrome is better than IE.
  • 4 Hide
    pharoahhalfdead , January 6, 2012 4:44 AM
    Good point Stoof. I have IE9 and the newest FF, and with the FF add ons, it blows IE out of the water. The majority of IE pages like yahoo video links, boxingscene etc take 6 or more seconds to load, whereas FF is only a fraction of the time.

    I think add ons are much easier to find with FF, and there seems to be a wider variety. Then again I do realize this article wasn't about browsers with add ons.
  • 4 Hide
    hardcore_gamer , January 6, 2012 4:50 AM
    The only one thing I hate about firefox is that it takes a lot of time to launch.
  • 6 Hide
    adamovera , January 6, 2012 5:02 AM
    stoofThe best part is I'm quite sure that this is using an out of the box build. Using a PGO compiled nighlty build, with about:config properly configured, and addons like Adblock/NoScript blocking things from ever loading Firefox is significantly faster than these benchmarks state.

    Yes, we're using everything stock. There is no one-size-fits-all combination of plug-ins to standardize on, and every browser might not have the exact same plugins available. So that throws out a fair comparison between browsers - wouldn't work for the WBGP. Perhaps an article concentrating specifically on Firefox (or another Web browser) with and without various plug-ins would clear that up?
  • 6 Hide
    Anonymous , January 6, 2012 5:09 AM
    Please use Firefox's latest logo, the one with the shiny orb in Mozilla's press kit! The one they're using now is the old one. http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/brand/identity/
  • -2 Hide
    nevertell , January 6, 2012 5:21 AM
    Chrome is the easiest to use if you've got lots of tabs open. Scrolling through them with mouse is a breeze and tab management is just excellent.
  • -9 Hide
    soccerdocks , January 6, 2012 5:28 AM
    frost_fenix. I enjoy chromes streamlined design but have recently discovered the noscript addon for Firefox and have since favored Firefox.


    Why do people seem to forget Chrome has this built in. All you have to do is go into the options menu and disable JavaScript.
  • 0 Hide
    de5_Roy , January 6, 2012 5:32 AM
    Firefox!!! oh yeah. i use ff and the new one kinda feels snappier. the addons are awesome.
    i know i know, chrome is faster, has market share, ie 9/10 are coming up, blah blah. but ff can still fight. google's benevolent (read: to antitrust-pacifier) fund injection should help ff. besides, chrome is a sneakware bundled with numerous softwares. ff has scriptblockers that block statcounter. :D 
  • 10 Hide
    Anonymous , January 6, 2012 5:42 AM
    Nobody else seems to have noticed that this article tries to rate browsers by speed differences that are far less than the blink of an eye. A browser is a tool - just use the ones you want and stop bothering people about their own choices. (I keep two or three loaded on my machine in case one of them has an issue with a particular webpage)
  • 2 Hide
    adamovera , January 6, 2012 6:04 AM
    Mozilla-fanPlease use Firefox's latest logo, the one with the shiny orb in Mozilla's press kit! The one they're using now is the old one. http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/brand/identity/

    Thanks for the feedback, and good catch. I must have goofed and started making the graphics with an older file when I already had the newer one. Doh! It's all fixed now, and it should update momentarily.
  • -4 Hide
    arcus_doom , January 6, 2012 6:23 AM
    Google Chrome basically sucked after they removed the Side Tabs option.
  • 2 Hide
    arunloveshacking , January 6, 2012 6:24 AM
    Have you ever noticed that Firefox hangs up whenever you switch tabs while attaching a file? Or is it only for me?
  • 6 Hide
    Anonymous , January 6, 2012 6:30 AM
    Dear Adam, you might want to remove the html5.com test as it represents nothing but a checklist. In no way does it test the correct implementation or functioning of html5 features.
  • 2 Hide
    bodyknight , January 6, 2012 7:16 AM
    I haven't read the name Soyo in a review since a decade ago...
  • 1 Hide
    MCstrick , January 6, 2012 7:52 AM
    nevertellChrome is the easiest to use if you've got lots of tabs open. Scrolling through them with mouse is a breeze and tab management is just excellent.


    Firefox can do the same with tab mix plus. I couldn't live without scrolling though my tabs.
  • 2 Hide
    freggo , January 6, 2012 8:33 AM
    Firefox wins, yet Chrome is #1 in usage.
    Just like VHS vs Beta, NTSC vs PAL or Gasoline vs Electric... just because the public likes something does not mean it is the best solution.
  • 1 Hide
    mayne92 , January 6, 2012 10:00 AM
    Great review Adam...as usual! Awesome work. A good read with my morning coffee! :) 
Display more comments