Java And Silverlight Performance Benchmarks
| Java |
GUIMark Java

Firefox and Chrome take the lead for Java performance in Windows 7, both earning close to 40 FPS. Opera earns a solid third-place finish at nearly 34 frames per second. Safari and IE9 bring up the rear at just over 32 FPS. All five Windows browsers score a perfectly playable 30+ FPS.
On the other hand, the four Mac OS X browsers only score in the 20 FPS range. Opera is the first-place finisher with a score that barely exceeds 20 FPS. Safari earns exactly 20 FPS to place second. Google Chrome comes in third at just under 19 FPS, and Firefox finishes last, right under 18 FPS.
| Silverlight |
Encog Silverlight

The Encog Silverlight Benchmark scores are close. But this time it's Opera that takes the lead in Windows. Firefox comes in second place, IE9 places third, Chrome earns fourth, and Safari winds up in fifth.
The placing changes significantly in Mac OS X, with Safari coming in first, followed by Opera, then Chrome, and then Firefox. The OS X scores are only about half of what we've seen in Windows. Remember, shorter bars are better here.
- 1 / 8
- Next
-
Latest Software News
Latest Software reviews
-
Latest Opera News
- Help Us With the Web Browser Grand Prix Scoring System
- GPU-Accelerated Opera 12 Alpha Available for Download
- Opera 12 Getting Hardware Acceleration
- People Mistake Opera Browser for Oprah Winfrey
- W3C: A Case of Careless Management
-
Latest Opera reviews
- Web Browser Grand Prix: Chrome 18, Firefox 11, Windows XP
- Web Browser Grand Prix 9: Chrome 17, Firefox 10, And Ubuntu
- Web Browser Grand Prix VIII: Chrome 16, Firefox 9, And Mac OS X
- Web Browser Grand Prix 7: Firefox 7, Chrome 14, Opera 11.51
- Web Browser Grand Prix VI: Firefox 6, Chrome 13, Mac OS X Lion
-
Latest Google News
- Google to Buy Arduino, Raspberry Pi Kits for UK Schools
- Google CEO Larry Page Wears Project Glass to London Event
- Google Officially Owns Motorola Mobility, Names New CEO
- Google Chrome Pushes Past Microsoft's Internet Explorer
- Samsung Unveils GSIII Complete with Own Version of Siri
-
Latest Google reviews
- Tom's Hardware Interviews Four Android And iOS Game...
- Asus Transformer Prime TF201: A Tablet With A Higher Calling
- Web Browser Grand Prix: Chrome 18, Firefox 11, Windows XP
- Web Browser Grand Prix 9: Chrome 17, Firefox 10, And Ubuntu
- Web Browser Grand Prix VIII: Chrome 16, Firefox 9, And Mac OS X

Been using Firefox for years - it works best for me.
This makes it worth putting up with the constant updates on Aurora.
The best part is I'm quite sure that this is using an out of the box build. Using a PGO compiled nighlty build, with about:config properly configured, and addons like Adblock/NoScript blocking things from ever loading Firefox is significantly faster than these benchmarks state.
I have use firefox and chrome interchangeably for a few years now. I enjoy chromes streamlined design but have recently discovered the noscript addon for Firefox and have since favored Firefox. I have also found Firefox to be more compatable with school webpages and application pages. Still either firefox or chrome is better than IE.
Good point Stoof. I have IE9 and the newest FF, and with the FF add ons, it blows IE out of the water. The majority of IE pages like yahoo video links, boxingscene etc take 6 or more seconds to load, whereas FF is only a fraction of the time.
I think add ons are much easier to find with FF, and there seems to be a wider variety. Then again I do realize this article wasn't about browsers with add ons.
The only one thing I hate about firefox is that it takes a lot of time to launch.
The best part is I'm quite sure that this is using an out of the box build. Using a PGO compiled nighlty build, with about:config properly configured, and addons like Adblock/NoScript blocking things from ever loading Firefox is significantly faster than these benchmarks state.
Yes, we're using everything stock. There is no one-size-fits-all combination of plug-ins to standardize on, and every browser might not have the exact same plugins available. So that throws out a fair comparison between browsers - wouldn't work for the WBGP. Perhaps an article concentrating specifically on Firefox (or another Web browser) with and without various plug-ins would clear that up?
Please use Firefox's latest logo, the one with the shiny orb in Mozilla's press kit! The one they're using now is the old one. http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/brand/identity/
Chrome is the easiest to use if you've got lots of tabs open. Scrolling through them with mouse is a breeze and tab management is just excellent.
. I enjoy chromes streamlined design but have recently discovered the noscript addon for Firefox and have since favored Firefox.
Why do people seem to forget Chrome has this built in. All you have to do is go into the options menu and disable JavaScript.
Firefox!!! oh yeah. i use ff and the new one kinda feels snappier. the addons are awesome.
i know i know, chrome is faster, has market share, ie 9/10 are coming up, blah blah. but ff can still fight. google's benevolent (read: to antitrust-pacifier) fund injection should help ff. besides, chrome is a sneakware bundled with numerous softwares. ff has scriptblockers that block statcounter.
Nobody else seems to have noticed that this article tries to rate browsers by speed differences that are far less than the blink of an eye. A browser is a tool - just use the ones you want and stop bothering people about their own choices. (I keep two or three loaded on my machine in case one of them has an issue with a particular webpage)
Please use Firefox's latest logo, the one with the shiny orb in Mozilla's press kit! The one they're using now is the old one. http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/brand/identity/
Thanks for the feedback, and good catch. I must have goofed and started making the graphics with an older file when I already had the newer one. Doh! It's all fixed now, and it should update momentarily.
Google Chrome basically sucked after they removed the Side Tabs option.
Have you ever noticed that Firefox hangs up whenever you switch tabs while attaching a file? Or is it only for me?
Dear Adam, you might want to remove the html5.com test as it represents nothing but a checklist. In no way does it test the correct implementation or functioning of html5 features.
I haven't read the name Soyo in a review since a decade ago...
Chrome is the easiest to use if you've got lots of tabs open. Scrolling through them with mouse is a breeze and tab management is just excellent.
Firefox can do the same with tab mix plus. I couldn't live without scrolling though my tabs.
Firefox wins, yet Chrome is #1 in usage.
Just like VHS vs Beta, NTSC vs PAL or Gasoline vs Electric... just because the public likes something does not mean it is the best solution.
Great review Adam...as usual! Awesome work. A good read with my morning coffee!