The Graphics Cards Articles
- Attack Out Of The Blind Spot: Matrox Parhelia-512
- VPU Technology Preview: The Wildcat VP Series From 3Dlabs
- At Last: A Hardware Decoder For MPEG-4
- Aaaaand Action! Video Editing with DVStorm SE From Canopus
- Making Themselves Heard: 11 GeForce4 Ti4400 and Ti4600 Cards
- Matrox Parhelia-512 - The Challenger
- Next Gen 3D Is On! 3Dlabs' P10 VPU
- VGA Charts I
- Digital Video Editing: The Canopus DVRaptor-RT
- Big Little Sister - The GeForce4 Ti4200
Forum
- for techie pros out there
- Are CPUs now "fast enough" for the vast majority of PC users?
- Building 15 Comps, Would love suggestions
- Just got The Phenom 9850Be today!!!
- AMD, Black Knight or White Knight, time is short
- Cheap AM2 Overclocking motherboard?
- To all TinkErz - First Buy; Build a Gaming Rig on a Budget
- I need a MOBO that will allow Dual SLI, a PhysX card, an X-F
- Whats a good overclock?
- Worthwhile upgrade?
1:08 PM - July 18, 2002 by
Lars Weinand
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: mainstream, radeon
Topics: AMD/ATI, NVIDIA
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: mainstream, radeon
Topics: AMD/ATI, NVIDIA
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
3D Mark 2001 SE (330)



The R9000 also appears to suffer from the poor multitexturing performance (relative to the R8500) in 3D Mark 2001 as well, as a result of its stripped down pixel engine. Yet the R9000 PRO has no problems keeping a grip on its mainstream competitors, NVIDIA and SiS.
- Previous page Quake 3
- Next page Comanche 4