Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Benchmark Results: Medium Quality Preset

Medal Of Honor Warfighter Performance, Benchmarked
By

The Medium detail preset introduces 4x anisotropic filtering and medium levels of the Antialiasing Post setting (FXAA), although MSAA is disabled. We also see reflections turned on and motion blur set to High.

At 1280x1024, the GeForce GT 630 GDDR5 isn't able to serve up consistent-enough performance in excess of 30 FPS, but the Radeon HD 6670 DDR3 manages to stay above that minimum most of the time. The other cards we include in this graph have little trouble pulling off such an entry-level resolution.

Stepping up to 1680x1050 knocks the Radeon HD 6670 DDR3 out of contention. The rest of the mid-range boards maintain their playable frame rates at this resolution and the Medium detail preset.

At 1920x1080, the GeForce GTX 650 and Radeon HD 7750 maintain playable frame rates that remain above 30 FPS at all times. The Radeon HD 7770 and GeForce GTX 650 Ti barely drop below 60 FPS.

Clearly, any $100+ graphics card will have little trouble with Medal of Honor Warfighter at 1920x1080, so long as they aren't overwhelmed with detail settings beyond the Medium preset. But how does higher-end hardware do under the duress of Ultra detail settings?

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 54 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 22 Hide
    greghome , November 2, 2012 6:14 AM
    No 7850 2GB to see if it's a memory bottleneck ? :/ 

    and you're missing the 7870 and 7950 in them. just sayin'
  • 17 Hide
    JJ1217 , November 2, 2012 6:23 AM
    You put a 7850 1 GB, so now no one is going to buy a 7850 to play this game, as they'll get the wrong results due to memory bandwidth constraints. People who know about video ram will have no issue with this, but what about those looking for a good cheap video card to run games well? You pretty much just destroyed any chance of someone getting a 7850 for this game, due to the terrible gathering of results.

    Expected more from T.H to be honest.
  • 12 Hide
    ojas , November 2, 2012 9:46 AM
    mohit9206its great to see that entry level cards like 650, 7750 and 7770 are all a viable option even at 1080p at high setting !!! am so proud of my 7750 .. hehe..btw i dont agree with toms on the fact that a game becomes "UNPLAYABLE" if its minimum fps drops below 30.thats just a load of bulls**t.

    Try playing the game (or any game) on a constant 60 and you'll see.

    Of course the level of comfort (as far as fps is concerned) varies from person to person, I personally don't enjoy it when the frame rates drop below 40, and sub 30 is intolerable.

    I guess what Don meant by unplayable was intolerable. And i guess most here, including me, would agree.
Other Comments
  • 4 Hide
    mayankleoboy1 , November 2, 2012 4:46 AM
    Nice review! :) 
    In CPU benchmark, it would have been better to see the continuous FPS graph , rather than just the single values of 'Average' and 'minimum' .

    Also, CPU frequency scaling is needed
  • 10 Hide
    esrever , November 2, 2012 5:39 AM
    Interesting that the 1gb on the 7850 starts showing signs of weakness at higher settings even at 1080p. The minimals went lower than the 7770 :o 

    I think nvidia's gpu boost is causing the nvidia cards to have higher average and lower minimals since it can render higher fps when less things are going on but they can only have so much performance when the rendering gets tough. I think GPU boost is a pointless feature because of that since why would anyone want high maximal fps and low minimal fps?
  • 22 Hide
    greghome , November 2, 2012 6:14 AM
    No 7850 2GB to see if it's a memory bottleneck ? :/ 

    and you're missing the 7870 and 7950 in them. just sayin'
  • 17 Hide
    JJ1217 , November 2, 2012 6:23 AM
    You put a 7850 1 GB, so now no one is going to buy a 7850 to play this game, as they'll get the wrong results due to memory bandwidth constraints. People who know about video ram will have no issue with this, but what about those looking for a good cheap video card to run games well? You pretty much just destroyed any chance of someone getting a 7850 for this game, due to the terrible gathering of results.

    Expected more from T.H to be honest.
  • 8 Hide
    JJ1217 , November 2, 2012 6:25 AM
    Woops didn't mean memory bandwidth, meant amount of memory ^.^
  • 6 Hide
    EzioAs , November 2, 2012 6:28 AM
    Quote:
    No 7850 2GB to see if it's a memory bottleneck ? :/ 

    and you're missing the 7870 and 7950 in them. just sayin'


    I'm curious as well, though in my opinion it's most probably a memory bottleneck at 1080p wilth ultra settings. BF3 already uses more than 1GB with max image settings with 4xAA as well so if Warfighter uses an updated Frosbite2 engine, it's highly plausible.

    On the other hand, I'm not fully satisfied that they didn't test the game with the 7870. And how about 560ti and 6870(the 2 very popular card from last-gen), I think at least a couple mid-range card from last gen should be tested
  • 4 Hide
    greghome , November 2, 2012 6:30 AM
    EzioAshow about 560ti and 6870(the 2 very popular card from last-gen), I think at least a couple mid-range card from last gen should be tested


    i miss my 6950 on benchmarks.......
    Story of my hardware life.

    First Year, Wow Top of the line
    2nd Year, Still in benchmarks
    3rd Year, Still performing good enough
    4th Year......I need an uphrade
  • 7 Hide
    the3dsgeek , November 2, 2012 6:54 AM
    Can you please do a performance benchmark comparison of NFS most wanted? its running like shit on my GTX670
  • 4 Hide
    ojas , November 2, 2012 7:40 AM
    Liked the way you ran benchmarks, covered all major resolutions with all major detail levels across a wide spectrum of cards.

    Anyway, didn't really read your game review, but Rock, Paper, Shotgun was extremely critical of the game, and i understand their sentiment, because BF3 is similar in some respects.
    http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2012/10/29/wot-i-think-medal-of-honor-warfighter/

    P.S. Why you no benchmark Sleeping Dogs? It brings my GTX 560 down to 40 fps minimums at 1024x768 at the highest settings...It may be a CPU bottleneck though, have to look into that fully.
  • 7 Hide
    ojas , November 2, 2012 7:52 AM
    the3dsgeekCan you please do a performance benchmark comparison of NFS most wanted? its running like shit on my GTX670

    Lol that's because it's a sucky console port.
  • -6 Hide
    mohit9206 , November 2, 2012 8:56 AM
    its great to see that entry level cards like 650, 7750 and 7770 are all a viable option even at 1080p at high setting !!! am so proud of my 7750 .. hehe..
    btw i dont agree with toms on the fact that a game becomes "UNPLAYABLE" if its minimum fps drops below 30.
    thats just a load of bulls**t.
  • 2 Hide
    captainblacko , November 2, 2012 9:03 AM
    Im shocked at the Pentium G860's FPS. that's pretty impressive for a £52 CPU!
  • 7 Hide
    Iastfan112 , November 2, 2012 9:08 AM
    I always give a big sigh when I see them acknowledge that the multiplayer is likely a CPU bottleneck....yet we're not going to make any sort of attempt to illustrate where it exists. It'd be lovely to know, for instance, does the 4170's four "cores" help it compared to the i3?

    I understand there would be a significantly greater margin of error compared to the repeatable SP benches but the information would still be pertinent and useful.
  • 12 Hide
    ojas , November 2, 2012 9:46 AM
    mohit9206its great to see that entry level cards like 650, 7750 and 7770 are all a viable option even at 1080p at high setting !!! am so proud of my 7750 .. hehe..btw i dont agree with toms on the fact that a game becomes "UNPLAYABLE" if its minimum fps drops below 30.thats just a load of bulls**t.

    Try playing the game (or any game) on a constant 60 and you'll see.

    Of course the level of comfort (as far as fps is concerned) varies from person to person, I personally don't enjoy it when the frame rates drop below 40, and sub 30 is intolerable.

    I guess what Don meant by unplayable was intolerable. And i guess most here, including me, would agree.
  • 6 Hide
    mayankleoboy1 , November 2, 2012 10:15 AM
    ojasTry plating the game (or any game) on a constant 60 and you'll see.Of course the level of comfort (as far as fps is concerned) varies from person to person, I personally don't enjoy it when the frame rates drop below 40, and sub 30 is intolerable.I guess what Don meant by unplayable was intolerable. And i guess most here, including me, would agree.


    Playing on intel IGP + P4 for many years made me accustomed to 30FPS. :p 
  • 4 Hide
    Onus , November 2, 2012 10:41 AM
    Interesting. I too have to wonder about the 1GB HD7850. The results don't appear to extrapolate cleanly to my 2GB HD7870.
    I've noticed you've used the DDR3 version of the HD6670 in recent tests, and would really like to see the GDDR5 version instead. For those who can't quite afford a HD7750, it seems to me that even the most entry level card for games should be one with GDDR5. Particularly in this case, it looks like this change might cross the line back into "playable" on some settings.
    It is also rather remarkable that an old Athlon II X2 240 can play this game as well as it does. Even though objective measurement might not be possible, I think some subjective observations on its ability to handle Multi-player would be useful.
  • 3 Hide
    ojas , November 2, 2012 11:04 AM
    jtt283Interesting. I too have to wonder about the 1GB HD7850. The results don't appear to extrapolate cleanly to my 2GB HD7870.I've noticed you've used the DDR3 version of the HD6670 in recent tests, and would really like to see the GDDR5 version instead. For those who can't quite afford a HD7750, it seems to me that even the most entry level card for games should be one with GDDR5. Particularly in this case, it looks like this change might cross the line back into "playable" on some settings.It is also rather remarkable that an old Athlon II X2 240 can play this game as well as it does. Even though objective measurement might not be possible, I think some subjective observations on its ability to handle Multi-player would be useful.

    I think their GPU chart puts the 6670 GDDR5 two tiers above the GDDR3...at par with a 9800GT.

    Also Tom's: Dishonored and Hitman: Absolution. One i know is resource intensive, the other one simple looks great, so i'm interested. :p 
  • 5 Hide
    Katsu_rap , November 2, 2012 11:25 AM
    Can't believe my 560ti isn't in the benches. It's not too long ago that I bought it and I believe many people who bought it a couple months ago aren't planning for another video card upgrade just yet.

    I'm not really complaining but you know, where's the value of mid-range cards if the next gen cards and new games comes out and they aren't even tested?
Display more comments