The Internal Storage Articles
- TravelStar 7K200 and 5K250 Beat the Band
- HyperDrive 4 Redefines Solid State Storage
- The Terabyte Battle
- Parallel Processing, Part 2: RAM and HDD
- WD Caviar GP: The "Green" 1 TB Drive
- SAS Hard Drives: 15,000 vs. 10,000 RPM
- Solid State Disk Drives Are Here
- Enthusiast 2.5" HDDs: Speed or Capacity?
- Storage Accessories for Geeks and Pros
- Should You Care About Hybrid Hard Drives?
Forum
- $4000 Budget Gaming Rig - Need Help
- if you were a winner, too...
- Could I get my proposed setup checked please?
- What if money didn't matter?--advice on a future-proof build
- My Bro Computer VS Mine (gaming Rigs)
- Mtron PRO 7500 vs Memoright GT
- Defrag SSD ?
- Detection delay Mtron SSD with ICH9R in AHCI/RAID
- cheap 2.5" SSD in a gaming tower?
- Mtron SSD 32 GB: Sweeping Performance with a Catch
Application Benchmarks
7:15 AM - November 21, 2007 by
Patrick Schmid
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: mtron, ssd, 32, gb
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: mtron, ssd, 32, gb
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
Application Benchmarks



Power Consumption

The power consumption results aren't impressive. In fact, the Mtron Flash SSD requires at least twice the power than the Samsung or SanDisk drives. Be prepared for a marginal reduction in battery runtime if you install the Mtron drive into your notebook. For high-performance desktops and servers, however, this power requirement is still amazingly low. Compared to the 15-20 W of a 3.5" SAS hard drive at 15,000 RPM; the little drives by Mtron deliver much more I/O performance per Watt.
- Previous page I/O Performance
- Next page Conclusion