Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 And 980 Review: Maximum Maxwell

Power Consumption In Detail

Idle Power Consumption

[EDIT] Our original Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 reference sample suffered from a BIOS issue that caused a higher-than-expected power draw. We flashed the card with the reference BIOS and have updated the charts below with the new results. [/EDIT]

There’s a huge difference between the two Gigabyte graphics cards. Nvidia’s reference board is almost exactly in the middle between them. The GTX 980 WindForce OC gives us our baseline by idling just under 10 W, while the derivative 970 consumes almost 20 W. This (relatively) massive difference was measured on the same platform using the same measurement methodology. Nvidia’s reference graphics card comes in at 16 W, right between the Gigabyte boards.

Our best guess is that Gigabyte has a “golden sample” at work here. But it goes to show what could be possible from Maxwell if production is refined further. We weren’t able to get our hands on a reference Nvidia GeForce GTX 970, so we had to use a downclocked version of a board partner’s card instead.

Power Consumption at Idle
Gigabyte GTX 980
Windforce OC
GeForce GTX 980
Reference
Gigabyte GTX 970
Windforce OC
PCIe Total3.99 W
3.78 W
4.56 W
Motherboard 3.3 V0.18 W
1.93 W1.32 W
Motherboard 12 V5.05 W
10.05 W
13.50 W
Total 9.22 W
15.76 W 19.34 W

Gaming Power Consumption

These findings further illustrate what we said on the previous page about Maxwell and its ability to regulate GPU voltage faster and more precisely. The gaming-based power consumption numbers show just how much efficiency can be increased if the graphics card matches how much power is drawn to the actual load needed. The version of the GeForce GTX 980 that comes overclocked straight from the factory manages to use significantly less power than the reference version, while offering six percent more performance at the same time.

Power Consumption while Gaming
Gigabyte GTX 980
Windforce OC
GeForce GTX 980
Reference
Gigabyte GTX 970
Windforce OC
PCIe Total137.38 W
143.85 W
132.70 W
Motherboard 3.3 V1.07 W 2.81 W2.27 W
Motherboard 12 V34.98 W39.04 W
42.84 W
VGA Card Total173.43 W 185.70 W
177.81 W

Let’s take a look at the measurements in detail. The large load fluctuations are plain to see.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Reference Card Measurement Results and Graphs

Gigabyte GTX 980 WindForce OC Measurement Results and Graphs

Gigabyte GTX 970 WindForce OC Measurement Results and Graphs

Stress Test Power Consumption

If the load is held constant, then the lower power consumption measurements vanish immediately. There’s nothing for GPU Boost to adjust, since the highest possible voltage is needed continuously. Nvidia's stated TDP becomes a distant dream. In fact, if you compare the GeForce GTX 980’s power consumption to an overclocked GeForce GTX Titan Black, there really aren’t any differences between them. This is further evidence supporting our assertion that the new graphics card’s increased efficiency is largely attributable to better load adjustment and matching.

Power Consumption Under Max. Load
Gigabyte GTX 980
Windforce OC
GeForce GTX 980
Reference
Gigabyte GTX 970
Windforce OC
PCIe Total237.63 W
122.70 W
192.46 W
Motherboard 3.3 V0.98 W1,83 W 2.15 W
Motherboard 12 V41.07 W 52.83 W
48.36 W
VGA Card Total279.68 W 177.36 W242.97 W

The values above have potential consequences for the everyday operation of these graphics cards, as they represent what can be expected when running performance-hungry compute-oriented applications optimized for CUDA and OpenCL.

That's not the only offering that makes a good impression, though. Nvidia's reference GeForce GTX 980 does well too, as long as you don’t focus on the idle power measurement. This isn't the same result as custom models with higher power targets (up to 300 Watts for the GTX 980), though, when compute-based stress tests are run. A taxing load just doesn't give Maxwell room for its optimizations to shine.

Note that the GeForce GTX 980's stress test power consumption is actually a few watts lower than the gaming result. This is likely due to throttling that kicks in when we hit the thermal ceiling.

Finally, let’s take a look at the detailed measurements. The much smaller load adjustments are illustrated graphically below. Pay particular attention to the reference card’s small drops when it hits the thermal limit.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Reference Card Measurement Results and Graphs

Gigabyte GTX 980 WindForce OC Measurement Results and Graphs

Gigabyte GTX 970 WindForce OC Measurement Results and Graphs

Maxwell’s performance can almost be compared to that of a compression tool. Already compressed data (our compute-heavy numbers) can’t be compressed any further, whereas text (games) can be compressed massively.

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
365 comments
    Your comment
    Top Comments
  • vertexx
    970 is the real story until the 980ti comes out - what a value proposition with the 970!

    Good stuff here - but you guys were a bit slow on this one. Tom's Hardware is the first site I visit every morning. But with the delay of this article, I've been all over the net this morning on other sites that got their stuff out sooner.
    17
  • cleeve
    Anonymous said:
    Why didn't you include an overclocking comparison? Why didn't you include the 780, but included the 770? Doesn't make much sense...


    Same answer to both... no time.

    We literally got the 970 for testing yesterday. The 980, we got the day before. We barely got the article out by this morning.

    For those of you who want more info, we'll be spending more time with the GeForce GTX 980 and 970 in the weeks to come, don't you worry. ;)
    10
  • Other Comments
  • Vivecss
    Wow.......
    2
  • lancear15
    I was waiting for Tom's review to make my final decision, the 980 is definitely going into my current 5960x build! I cant wait.
    2
  • HKILLER
    so how long before you do a round up?i mean this time i've seen some pretty crazy looking cards (Zotac's Extreme AMP! edition looks crazy and the Inno3D too)and EVGA has shown off ACX 2.0 which they claim to be the most efficient GPU air cooler in the world...so many to choose from also EVGA FTW has been nicely overclocked i've seen it performing almost on par with 980
    4
  • realibrad
    byt he way... Last page 2nd sentence after the graph of Avg game performance.

    I was hoping for more performance but the efficiency is quite nice. They just put pressure on the top end and gave us a price reduction, instead of overall performance gains.
    1
  • balister
    Very nice, but I still want to see what the power consumption along with what might be possible with the drop to 20nm (since this is still 28nm).

    Likely, we're going to see a Maxwell Titan equivalent come in the next year or so as these are a x04 much like Kepler with the 670/80s were and we're still going to be waiting to see what the x10 will be with the Maxwell architecture.
    4
  • MANOFKRYPTONAK
    Why didn't you include an overclocking comparison? Why didn't you include the 780, but included the 770? Doesn't make much sense...
    0
  • vertexx
    970 is the real story until the 980ti comes out - what a value proposition with the 970!

    Good stuff here - but you guys were a bit slow on this one. Tom's Hardware is the first site I visit every morning. But with the delay of this article, I've been all over the net this morning on other sites that got their stuff out sooner.
    17
  • daveys93
    Will there be a follow-up article about overclocking these cards? Other sites are showing results that both of the new cards are capable of 1500+ MHz on air (aftermarket coolers and even a few with stock coolers), which is a massive overclock. Looks like NVIDIA left the door open for some decent voltage increases, but many results have been in the 1450-1500 MHz range at stock voltage. I am a big fan of the thoroughness of Tom's articles so I am very interested in seeing overclocking results and analysis from this site.
    5
  • nikolajj
    I need this...
    2
  • tobalaz
    I want a 970, wow!
    That's some flat out insane price / performance ratio right there!
    3
  • cleeve
    Anonymous said:
    Why didn't you include an overclocking comparison? Why didn't you include the 780, but included the 770? Doesn't make much sense...


    Same answer to both... no time.

    We literally got the 970 for testing yesterday. The 980, we got the day before. We barely got the article out by this morning.

    For those of you who want more info, we'll be spending more time with the GeForce GTX 980 and 970 in the weeks to come, don't you worry. ;)
    10
  • BigMack70
    Since we know this is only the mid-size Maxwell chip (just like GK104 vs GK110), shouldn't this article title be "Medium Maxwell"?

    I'm waiting for the real Maximum Maxwell myself. Unimpressed with these xxx04 launches from Nvidia.
    -4
  • EnkiduW
    Wonder what dual 970's would look like, the price is not that bad...
    2
  • MANOFKRYPTONAK
    Why didn't you include an overclocking comparison? Why didn't you include the 780, but included the 770? Doesn't make much sense...
    1
  • vertexx
    Anonymous said:
    Wonder what dual 970's would look like, the price is not that bad...


    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_970_SLI/

    Depending on resolution, dual 970's are roughly equal to the 295x2 at only 2/3's the price.
    4
  • Novuake
    Performance aside, which OBVIOUSLY is stellar for current price/performance consideration.

    The features that Nvidia has been rolling out constantly has been quite impressive, while many of them do not appeal to me at all, the sheer amount and in most cases quality of them is insane.

    Well done Nvidia. Let's see what AMD responds with, my next main gaming machine purchase as of now are 2 x Nvidia GTX970.

    EDIT : Im sure that its a good upgrade to my 2 x HD7950s :D
    4
  • Novuake
    Anonymous said:
    Anonymous said:
    Why didn't you include an overclocking comparison? Why didn't you include the 780, but included the 770? Doesn't make much sense...


    Same answer to both... no time.

    We literally got the 970 for testing yesterday. The 980, we got the day before. We barely got the article out by this morning.

    For those of you who want more info, we'll be spending more time with the GeForce GTX 980 and 970 in the weeks to come, don't you worry. ;)


    Thank you! That answered a question I had in a previous GTX980/970 tease on the live news feed.

    Do you guys have this problem often with Nvidia? You always seem to have fewer Nvidia board partner variaty and slower review releases on Nvidia GPUs.
    More so than other websites.
    1
  • vertexx
    Anonymous said:
    Anonymous said:
    Anonymous said:
    Why didn't you include an overclocking comparison? Why didn't you include the 780, but included the 770? Doesn't make much sense...


    Same answer to both... no time.

    We literally got the 970 for testing yesterday. The 980, we got the day before. We barely got the article out by this morning.

    For those of you who want more info, we'll be spending more time with the GeForce GTX 980 and 970 in the weeks to come, don't you worry. ;)


    Thank you! That answered a question I had in a previous GTX980/970 tease on the live news feed.

    Do you guys have this problem often with Nvidia? You always seem to have fewer Nvidia board partner variaty and slower review releases on Nvidia GPUs.
    More so than other websites.


    My bets are that no NVidia GPUs on the best GPU's for the $$ for the past several months earned Tom's a slight delay in the delivery of these GPUs. :ouch:
    2
  • Novuake
    Anonymous said:

    My bets are that no NVidia GPUs on the best GPU's for the $$ for the past several months earned Tom's a slight delay in the delivery of these GPUs. :ouch:


    Nah, doubt Nvidia is that petty.

    More publicity is exactly that, more publicity.

    Tom's has been around a long time and is trusted by A LOT of people.
    Doubt Nvidia would compromise the user base.
    7
  • Nossy
    Nvidia and Intel are so way ahead of AMD...
    -2