Benchmark Suite
Our current Android test lineup is comprised of six key sections: CPU, GPU, GPGPU, Web, Display, and Battery.
| CPU | AnTuTu X, Basemark OS II Full, Geekbench 3 Pro, MobileXPRT 2013 |
|---|---|
| GPU | 3DMark, Basemark X 1.1 Full, GFXBench 3.0 Corporate |
| GPGPU | CompuBenchRS |
| Web | Browsermark 2.0, JSBench, Peacekeeper 2.0, WebXPRT 2013 |
| Display | Brightness (Min/Max), Black Level, Contrast Ratio, Gamma, Color Temperature, Color Gamut Volume (sRGB/AdobeRGB) |
| Battery | Basemark OS II Full, BatteryXPRT 2014, GFXBench 3.0 Corporate |
Test Methodology
All handsets are benchmarked on a fully-updated copy of the device’s stock software. The table below lists other common device settings that we standardize to before testing.
| Bluetooth | Off |
|---|---|
| Brightness | 200 nits |
| Cellular | SIM Removed |
| Display Mode | Device Default (non-adaptive) |
| Location Services | Off |
| Power | Battery |
| Sleep | Never (or longest possible interval) |
| Volume | Muted |
| Wi-Fi | On |
Comparison System Specs
The table below contains all the pertinent technical specifications for today’s comparison units:
| Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pricing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SoC | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 (APQ8064T) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 (MSM8974AA) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 (MSM8974AA) | Nvidia Tegra 4 (T114) | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa (5410) | Apple A7 |
| CPU Core | Qualcomm Krait 300 (4 Core) @ 1.7 GHz | Qualcomm Krait 400 @ 2.26 GHz | Qualcomm Krait 400 (4 Core) @ 2.26 GHz | ARM Cortex-A15 (4 Core) @ 1.8 GHz | ARM Cortex-A15 (4 Core) @ 1.6 GHz + ARM Cortex-A7 (4 Core) @ 1.2 GHz | Apple Cyclone (2 Core) @ 1.3 GHz |
| GPU Core | Qualcomm Adreno 320 (24 ALU) @ 400 MHz | Qualcomm Adreno 330 (32 ALU) @ 450 MHz | Qualcomm Adreno 330 (4 Core) @ 450 MHz | Nvidia GeForce ULP (72 Core) @ 672 MHz | Imagination PowerVR SGX544MP3 (3 Core) @ 532 MHz | Imagination PowerVR G6430 (4 Cluster) @ 200 MHz |
| Memory | 2 GB LPDDR3 | 3 GB LPDDR3 | 2 GB LPDDR3 | 2 GB LPDDR3 | 2 GB LPDDR3 | 1 GB LPDDR3 |
| Display | 5.9-inch IPS @ 1920x1080 (377 PPI) | 5.7-inch SAMOLED @ 1920x1080 (386 PPI) | 4.95-inch IPS @ 1920x1080 (445 PPI) | 5-inch IPS @ 1920x1080 (441 PPI) | 5.1-inch IPS @ 1800x1080 (412 PPI) | 4-inch IPS @ 1136x640 (326 PPI) |
| Battery | 3610 mAh (Non-removable) | 3200 mAh (Removable) | 2300 mAh (Non-removable) | 3050 mAh (Non-removable) | 2400 mAh (Non-removable) | 1560 mAh (Non-removable) |
| Storage | 16/32 GB | 32/64 GB | 16/32 GB | 16/64 GB | 16/32/64/128 GB | 16/32/64 GB |
| Optics | 13 MP 1/3.06-inch, 1.12um, f/2.0 wide, AF, HDR, Dual-LED Flash | 13 MP 1/3.06-inch, 1.12um, f/2.2 wide, AF, HDR, LED Flash | 8 MP, AF, HDR, LED Flash | 13 MP, AF, HDR, Dual-LED Flash | 8 MP, 1.4um, AF, LED Flash | 8 MP, 1/3-inch, 1.5um, AF, HDR, Dual-LED Flash |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 802.11b/g/n, Bluetooth 4.0, NFC, microUSB 2.0 | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Bluetooth 4.0, NFC, microUSB 3.0 (MHL 2.0) | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n/ac, Bluetooth 4.0, NFC, microUSB 2.0 | Wi-Fi 802.11b/g/n, Bluetooth 4.0, microUSB 2.0 | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n, microUSB 2.0 (MHL) | Wi-Fi 802.11a/b/g/n, Bluetooth 4.0, Lightning |
| Size | 170.7 x 82.6 x 9 mm, 213 g | 151.2 x 79.2 x 8.3 mm, 168 g | 137.84 x 69.17 x 8.59 mm, 130 g | 144 x 73.6 x 8.1 mm, 145 g | 139 x 71.9 x 9.1 mm, 143 g | 123.8 x 58.6 x 7.6 mm, 112 g |
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is joining us today to represent the N1's main competitor in the phablet market. And as usual, the iPhone 5s, Nexus 5, Meizu MX3, and Xiaomi Mi3 are in attendance to represent the latest SoCs from Apple, Qualcomm, Samsung, and Nvidia (respectively).
Previous
Next
Summary
- Oppo Dreams Big: The N1 Phablet
- Look And Feel: Primarily Plastic, Positively Premium
- Regarding The Phablet Experience
- Camera: Hardware And Software
- Camera: Photo And Video Quality
- Notable Hardware Features
- ColorOS Software Tour
- CyanogenMod Software Tour
- How We Tested Oppo's N1 Phablet
- Results: CPU Core Benchmarks
- Results: Web Benchmarks
- Results: GPU Core Benchmarks
- Results: GFXBench 3.0
- Results: GPGPU Benchmarks
- Brightness, Black Level, Contrast Ratio, And Gamma
- Results: Battery Life And Performance
- A Phablet For A Niche Market
Ask a Category Expert
Probably due to to imperfections in the transistors that control the OLED pixels, there is a very faint but perceptible in deep darkness leakage of energy toward the pixels.
Yes, doesn't compare to the obvious light bleed of any TFT display, but the OLED "off" pixels are not truly off, they have a 0.00something-small level of light which could theoretically be measured by some very sensitive equipment.
The eyes are certainly capable of seeing it...
With the mostly passable image quality, that would not help the N1 much though.
First time I read the term I had the image of holding my 10" Asus pad up to my face and talking into it. I suppose it's better than a shoe; cleaner, too.
True but people couldn't watch porn on their phones back then so it made sense to make them as small as possible. Not so now ... ^^
No removable battery is a shitty solution. Its the issue all phones face after 2 years, their batteries no longer hold a charge.
No removable battery is a shitty solution. Its the issue all phones face after 2 years, their batteries no longer hold a charge.
lol that's a scam the companies do to force you to buy a new one
Guess it is a little better than the shoe...
1080-1200p is a pretty reasonable balance between cost and benefits under 10" and micro-USB is not going anywhere any time soon simply because the micro-USB3 connector is huge and it will take a while for USB3.1 ports to become widespread... and then you have the problem of many countries such as the EU choosing micro-USB as the universal charger spec, guaranteeing that micro-USB will stick around well beyond the new USB3.1 connectors.
Amen to that, bro. Phones are made to be mobile PCs, and phablets are just not mobile phones...