- Weird and Wonderful PCs: Your Stories Part 2
- Weird and Wonderful PCs and PC Mods, Your Stories
- The $300 PC
- Weird and Wonderful PCs and Mods
- How To Build A PC, Part 3: Putting It All Together
- How To Build A PC, Part 2: Choosing the Right Vendor
- The MythTV Convergence: Unofficial Plug-ins
- How To Build A PC, Part 1: Component Selection Overview
- Building a Low-Power Home Theater PC System
- MythTV Plug-ins
Benchmark Results
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: overindulge, qx6800
Syndication:
Benchmark Results
Most of the benchmark scores are for bragging rights of the companies involved, and for those who want to see how their systems compare against them. For the most part you should expect the Mach V to win the tests, as it has a faster processor and faster graphics cards. Both systems ran flawlessly throughout the tests, delivering performance levels most people can only dream about.
PCMark05

Of course the overall score is a summation of the parts in Futuremark testing software; the same is true for PCMark05. Faster core clock speeds will aid the speed at which file decryption, text editing, file compression and other CPU intensive tasks are completed. When there is interaction between the CPU and the rest of the system, the speed of the bus between the CPU and Northbridge will come into play. In both arenas, the Falcon system has higher clock speeds, so it will score better.
3DMark05



The same holds true for 3DMark as it did in PCMark05: faster scores higher. Ironically, the score is maxed out on the overclocked Falcon quad core processor at 1024x768 and 1280x1024. Seems we need a faster processor!
- Previous page System Settings
- Next page Doom 3