Shop for Computer Cooling Fans
HDT-S1283 CPU Cooler HDT-S1283 CPU Cooler

Compare the top 5 lowest prices by hovering your mouse over the product names on the left

$36.99
Freezer 7 Pro CPU Heatsink $36.99
CNPS9700 LED CPU Cooler CNPS9700 LED CPU Cooler $69.99
CL-P0401 V1 CPU Cooler CL-P0401 V1 CPU Cooler $69.99
Zalman CNPS9500 AM2 CPU Cooler $55.99

See More Products...

DirectX Applications

12:00 PM - January 27, 1997 by Thomas Pabst
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: pentium, mmx, live, expectations

Syndication: Add to your Google homepage Add to My Yahoo!

DirectX Applications

The first disappointment about the new Pentium MMX is its DirectX, especially its Direct3D performance. It is hardly any better than the performance of a Pentium Classic. This wasn't expected by me, since MMX was meant to enhance DirectX directly. The Benchmarks were all run with the latest DirectX 3 drivers installed. Obviously the best improvement is seen in RGB mode. RAMP mode hardly shows any difference.

My Monster Truck Madness Benchmark didn't show any improve over the Pentium Classic at all. This is to be considered as fairly sad, because lots of gamers were hoping to save the purchase of a 3D enhanced Video Card, like e.g. the Diamond Monster3D, due to the MMX enhancements of the P55C. Obviously so far we can forget about this. Either Microsoft has to improve their DirectX, especially Direct3D drivers, or the games have to use MMX instructions directly.

Currently Windows 95 gamers certainly hardly benefit from MMX at all and they can stick to the cheaper Pentium Classic for now.

I found an explanation for this problem, which doesn't make MMX look too good for 3D freaks at all. It's the missing 32bit SIMD multiply option of MMX.

Quake 1.06 Timedemo2 (@640x480) [fps] 16.8 16.1 15.4
Chris Dial's 3D Bench (SVGA) [fps] 38.2 38 37.3
PCPlayer DOS Game Benchmark [fps] 25.1 24.1 22.3

Talkback
Be the first to comment on this review!

Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.