Speed And Voltage Table, Test Setup And Components

Previous Next
2:00 AM - 04/03/2009 by Patrick Schmid and Achim Roos

Processor Clock Speed / Voltages
CPU Clock
2.8 GHz
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Multiplier
14x
15x
16x
17x
18x
19x
CPU Voltage
Auto
Auto
Auto
Auto
1.4 V
1.5 V


Test Setup

System Hardware
Hardware
Details
CPU AMD
AMD Phenom II X4 940 (45 nm, 3.0 GHz, 4x 512 KB L2 and 6 MB L3 Cache, TDP 125 W, Rev. C2)
Motherboard
(Socket AM2+)
Jetway HA07-Ultra (Rev. 1.0)
Chipset: AMD 790GX, SB750
BIOS: 06 (01/12/2009)
RAM DDR2
2x 2 GB DDR2-1142 (Corsair CM2X2048-9136C5D) operating @ DDR2-1055 (CL5-5-5-15)
Graphics Card

Zotac Geforce GTX260²
Chip: Geforce GTX260² (Core 576 MHz, Shader 1242 MHz)
RAM: 896 MB 448 Bit (1998 MHz)

Hard Drive
Western Digital VelociRaptor, 300 GB (WD3000HLFS) 10,000 RPM, SATA/300, 16 MB Cache
Blu-Ray Drive
LG GGW-H20L, SATA/150
Power Supply
Fortron Everest 1010, 1010 W
System Software and Drivers
Operating System
Windows Vista Enterprise Version 6.0 SP1 (Build 6000)
DRIVERS AND SETTING
Nvidia GeForce Drivers182.08
AMD Chipsset DriversRadeon 9.3
3D Games: Benchmarks And Settings
Benchmarks
Details
Crysis
Version: 1.2.1, Video Mode: 1680x1050, Overall Quality: low, Demo: CPU-Benchmark2 + Tom's Hardware Tool
Unreal Tournament 3
Version: 1.2, Video Mode: 1680x1050, Sound and DirectX10, Video Quality:
Texture Details: 1
Level Details: 1
Demo: vCTF-CONTAINMENT_fly
Time: 12/60
World In Conflict
Version: 1.0.0.9
Video Mode: 1680x1050 and 800x600
Video Quality: low details
Demo: Game-Benchmark
Audio Benchmarks and Settings
Benchmarks
Details
iTunes
Version: 7.7.1.11, Audio CD (Terminator II SE), 53 min, Default format AAC
Lame MP3
Version 3.98, Audio CD "Terminator II SE", 53 min, wave to mp3, 160 Kbps
Video Benchmarks and Settings
Benchmarks
Details
Pinnacle Studio 12
Version: 12.0.0.6163, Encoding and Transition Rendering, DV camcorder movie
Video:
720 x 576 Pixel, PAL, 25 fps, 6000 Kbits/sec
Audio:
MPEG Layer 2, 224 Kbits/sec 16 Bit, Stereo 44.1 KHz
File Type: MPEG-2 (DVD Compatible)
TMPEG 4.5
Version: 4.5.1.254
Vieo: Terminator 2 SE DVD (720x576, 16:9) 5 Minutes
Audio: Dolby Digital, 48000 Hz, 6-Kanal, English
Advanced Acoustic Engine MP3 Encoder (160 kbps, 44.1 KHz)
DivX 6.8.3
Version: 6.8.3
== Main Menu ==
default
== Codec Menu ==
Encoding mode: Insane Quality
Enhanced multithreading
Enabled using SSE4
Quarter-pixel search
== Video Menu ==
Quantization: MPEG-2
Xvid 1.1.3
Version: 1.1.3
Other Options / Encoder Menu -Display encoding status = off
Mainconcept Reference 1.5.1
Reference H.264 Plugin Pro 1.5.1
Version: 1.5.1
MPEG2 to MPEG2 (H.264)
MainConcept H.264/AVC Codec
28 sec HDTV 1920x1080 (MPEG2)
Audio:
MPEG2 (44.1 kHz, 2 Channel, 16 Bit, 224 kbps)
Codec: H.264
Mode: PAL (25 FPS)
Profile: Tom's Hardware Settings for Qct-Core
Adobe Premiere Pro CS3 HDTV
Mainconcept H.264 Plugin 3.2
Windows Media Encoder 9.1 AP HDTV
Windows Audio Encoder 10 Pro
Version: 3.0
NTSC MPEG2-HDTV 1920x1080 (24 sec)
Import: Mainconcept NTSC HDTV 1080i
Export: Adobe Media Encoder
== Video ==
Windows Media Video 9 Advanced Profile
Encoding Passes: one
Bitrate Mode: Constant
Frame: 1920x1080
Frame Rate: 29.97
Maximum Bitrate [kbps]: 2000
Image Quality: 50.00
== Audio ==
Windows Media Audio 10 Professional
Encoding Passes: one
Bitrate Mode: Constant
Audio Format:
160 kbps, 44.1 kHz, 2 channel 16 bit (A/V) CBR
Application Benchmarks and Settings
Benchmarks
Details
Grisoft AVG Anti-Virus 8Version: 8.0.134
Virus base: 270.4.5/1533
Benchmark
Scan: some compressed ZIP and RAR archives
WinRar 3.8
Version 3.80 BETA 4
WinZIP Commandline Version 2.3
Compression = Best
Dictionary = 4096 KB
Benchmark: THG-Workload
WinZip 11
Version 11.2 (8094)
Compression = Best
Benchmark: THG-Workload
Maxon Cinema 4D Release 10Version: 10.008
Rendering from a scene
(Water drop at a Rose)
Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - 8Bit (50 frames)
Adobe Photoshop CS 3Version: 10.0x20070321, Filtering a 69 MB TIF-Photo, Benchmark: Tomshardware-Benchmark V1.0.0.4, Programmed by Tomshardware using Delphi 2007, Filters:
Crosshatch
Glass
Sumi-e
Accented Edges
Angled Strokes
Sprayed Strokes
Deep Fritz 11Version: 11
Fritz Chess Benchmark Version 4.2
Synthetic Benchmarks and Settings
Benchmarks
Details
3DMark Vantage
Version: 1.02, Options: Performance, Graphics Test 1, Graphics Test 2, CPU Test 1, CPU Test 2
PCMark Vantage
Version: 1.00, PCMark Benchmark, Memories Benchmark, Windows Media Player 10.00.00.3646


Zotac GeForce GTX 260² 55 nm

Western Digital VelociRaptor 300 GB


Talkback
MAD4AMD 04/03/2009 8:32 AM
Hide
-0+

Great article! As always, Tom's showing another point of view for handling your hardware. And, yeah, Fusion works Bigtime! Better performance guaranteed.

ravenware 04/03/2009 9:29 AM
Hide
-3+

Good article, I have always been curious about how effective certain clock increases would actually be; especially for locked AMD cpus as you have to retard the ram frequency to get the core clock up higher which may result in a bottleneck.

wilsonkf 04/03/2009 10:03 AM
Hide
-3+

Useful article.

About the higher-than-spec voltage applied - however, it is not recommand to set higher that safety limit (recommanded by AMD) voltage AND CnQ enabled together - the CPU could become much less overclockable after a short period, due to damage by switching voltage up and down from unsafe voltage.

Anonymous 04/03/2009 10:20 AM
Hide
-2+

Useful article for amd users. We are waiting like this article for core i7 cpus too.

Athlon_eX 04/03/2009 11:01 AM
Hide
-0+

Well I'm already running my Phenom II 940 at 3.6, but I'm doing this with a mix of lower multiplier than 18 and slightly higher HTT clock, I'm running at 17.5x206=3605, ofcourse @ 1.4v.. I think it's a good idea to try the same overclocking speed but with the higher HTT clock, as this will increase the performance a little ( RAM will be overclocked too ).. it will be harder I know but it may worth the try...

neiroatopelcc 04/03/2009 11:23 AM
Hide
--2+

ehh "But how far should you go? Efficiency has become almost equally important to performance," efficiency is more like the opposite of performance with overclockers really!
It's pointles to even consider efficiency as an overclocker! It's a bit like trying to tune a H2 for economy instead of torque or high rev horsepower .... you shouldn't have picked a H2 in the first place if efficiency is a concern.
Power saving features for when systems aren't doing anything are welcome, but anything else is imo irrelevant.

Lozil 04/03/2009 11:55 AM
Hide
-1+

Indeed a Nice article after a Much time on Tomshardware, Straight and Up to the point in describing about the benefits of Overclocking..

Slobogob 04/03/2009 12:27 PM
Hide
-0+

Indeed a nice article. What i don't really "get" is why a Jetway mainboard was used? I can't even find a retailer in europe that has it on sale...

jtt283 04/03/2009 1:50 PM
Hide
-1+

Hey Chris, thanks for getting the site's metadata updated. The charts became visible while I was reading this article.
Neiroatopelcc has a point, but Fusion should address that. Striving for performance does not mean striving for waste, it means ignoring it. Well, I don't think anyone would argue that ignorance is a good thing. People will be able to OC to the teeth when they need it, but still be efficient when they don't.

shabodah 04/03/2009 3:02 PM
Hide
-0+

Great Overclocking article, but how about an underclocking article for the HTPC crowd? I'm kinda curious how much power different Phenom IIs use between 800 mhz & 2 ghz.

salsoolo 04/03/2009 4:15 PM
Hide
-1+

i still cant understand why does the i7 965 is 4x expensive than 940 ?

haricotvert 04/03/2009 5:06 PM
Hide
-4+

Salsoolo :
i still cant understand why does the i7 965 is 4x expensive than 940 ?



Because bragging rights are important to people with small genitalia, and they don't mind paying for that privilege.

IzzyCraft 04/03/2009 5:21 PM
Hide
-0+

haricotvert :
Because bragging rights are important to people with small genitalia, and they don't mind paying for that privilege.


Not everyone likes to oc? although i don't get why you would go 965 over 920 unless that kind of money meant little difference to you.

Anonymous 04/03/2009 5:46 PM
Hide
-0+

what is fun about all this coments is that despite all things you say
im from argentina and this OC does not exist here jajaja
and in addition we have the devaluation of our money and it cost to us almost 4 times what costs you anything
example here a core 2 duo e8400 costs 800 pesos ... that is 220 dolars + -
and i presume that even that in where you live isnt the real cost... instead much lower

great page toms hardware by the way... the only thing is that everything is so expensive that i can only see the things but dont have it jajaja

tomich 04/03/2009 8:42 PM
Hide
-0+

yeah, ariel is right.. im from Argentina too.. as a computer technician i've seen a lot of monsters (super mega cooled I7's super mega overclocked Phenom's) but is not normal. i was thinkin on buying a system like this one (i cant afford a 1100 Watts PSU so i will go for something like 600 to 750W) and with that money me and my girlfriend live 3 months(including taxes). jejeje (no display included in the prize 'coz i already have a monitor).. I can't find anything that sounds similar to "Jetway" here.. so maybe i'll go for a MSI mother.. But i still have doubts as for the cooling.. What cooling solution was used in this article? stock cooler? the on ei see in the picture looks like a zalman or something like that.. can anyone answer that for me?..
Thanks in advance
Tom

hannibal 04/03/2009 9:14 PM
Hide
-0+

I agree, this seems to be an usefull article. But as was said in the above, could it be possible to see an article where that "sweet point" 3.6 Ghz would be achieved using different HTT clock? Is it really worth of it? How it affects the power consumption? Maybe a very little, but it would be nice to see!
You all ready have proven that 3.6 GHz is the sweet point with normal HTT clocks, can the situation be different with different HTT settings? Or is it too much relative to the individual CPU you hapens to have?

All is all this was interesting article to read! Keep it up!

dimaf1985 04/03/2009 10:50 PM
Hide
-1+

Very nice article
I was considering buying something a little more fancy than my OCZ Vanquisher so that i could go above 1.4v, but apparently there's no point, so thank you for saving me ~$100CDN.

There are still some unresolved questions here. Why a Jetway mobo with a 790GX chipset? Something with a 790FX would have made more sense. Why would you leave CNQ on during overclocking? The first thing every OC guide will tell you is to TURN CNQ OFF. Also, how much does power consumption/temperature increase as NB frequency goes up? i.e. if you increase the reference clock, rather than the multi, the NB freq. goes up. How does that impact stability/power consumption/temperature?

Still some mysteries here, but a nice article nonetheless.

CoopCHennick 04/04/2009 12:00 PM
Hide
-0+

To Chris or someone,
I dont know if the other users are experiencing this but every few pages I click through on this site, especially during the articles, I get a message from my antivirus alerting me of a virus from a file when im loading a new page. I click "Deny" each time and all seems well.

Virus: HEUR:Trojan.Script.Iframer
File: http://ad.trafficmp.com/a/js?plid=10637

Im using Firefox, Windows 7 build 7000, and Kaspersky for AV

cangelini 04/04/2009 12:38 PM
Hide
-0+

Coop--let me report this and see what happens. The malware issue we saw before was solved. I sincerely hope this isn't something new. Thanks for the heads-up!

Anonymous 04/04/2009 1:20 AM
Hide
-2+

This article is exactly how i overclock. Default voltage max stable, and then i back it off a little bit, or ill do a tiny increase in voltage but no more.

Anything more then that are for 2 reason:

1) Bragging rights
2) People who don't care about the cost of their computer parts.

If you have money to buy the latest and greatest every time it comes out and are changing hardware every 6 months, by all means push the chip to the limit and throw the voltage up, who cares if it frys.

But its kinda funny when you see someone on a budget pushing their hardware with massive voltage increases ets, its just dumb if you cant afford to fry it.


Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links

All about CPU
 Latest CPU articles
All CPU articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

crazy : Interactive Boogy Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
action : Yoyo the Star Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
Ads

Sponsored links