2:00 AM - 04/03/2009 by
Patrick Schmid and Achim Roos
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (39) |
- Share

| Processor Clock Speed / Voltages | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | 14x | 15x | 16x | 17x | 18x | 19x |
| CPU Voltage | Auto | Auto | Auto | Auto | 1.4 V | 1.5 V |
Test Setup
| System Hardware | |
|---|---|
| Hardware | Details |
| CPU AMD | AMD Phenom II X4 940 (45 nm, 3.0 GHz, 4x 512 KB L2 and 6 MB L3 Cache, TDP 125 W, Rev. C2) |
| Motherboard (Socket AM2+) | Jetway HA07-Ultra (Rev. 1.0) Chipset: AMD 790GX, SB750 BIOS: 06 (01/12/2009) |
| RAM DDR2 | 2x 2 GB DDR2-1142 (Corsair CM2X2048-9136C5D) operating @ DDR2-1055 (CL5-5-5-15) |
| Graphics Card | Zotac Geforce GTX260² |
| Hard Drive | Western Digital VelociRaptor, 300 GB (WD3000HLFS) 10,000 RPM, SATA/300, 16 MB Cache |
| Blu-Ray Drive | LG GGW-H20L, SATA/150 |
| Power Supply | Fortron Everest 1010, 1010 W |
| System Software and Drivers | |
|---|---|
| Operating System | Windows Vista Enterprise Version 6.0 SP1 (Build 6000) |
| DRIVERS AND SETTING | |
| Nvidia GeForce Drivers | 182.08 |
| AMD Chipsset Drivers | Radeon 9.3 |
| 3D Games: Benchmarks And Settings | |
|---|---|
| Benchmarks | Details |
| Crysis | Version: 1.2.1, Video Mode: 1680x1050, Overall Quality: low, Demo: CPU-Benchmark2 + Tom's Hardware Tool |
| Unreal Tournament 3 | Version: 1.2, Video Mode: 1680x1050, Sound and DirectX10, Video Quality: Texture Details: 1 Level Details: 1 Demo: vCTF-CONTAINMENT_fly Time: 12/60 |
| World In Conflict | Version: 1.0.0.9 Video Mode: 1680x1050 and 800x600 Video Quality: low details Demo: Game-Benchmark |
| Audio Benchmarks and Settings | |
|---|---|
| Benchmarks | Details |
| iTunes | Version: 7.7.1.11, Audio CD (Terminator II SE), 53 min, Default format AAC |
| Lame MP3 | Version 3.98, Audio CD "Terminator II SE", 53 min, wave to mp3, 160 Kbps |
| Video Benchmarks and Settings | |
|---|---|
| Benchmarks | Details |
| Pinnacle Studio 12 | Version: 12.0.0.6163, Encoding and Transition Rendering, DV camcorder movie Video: 720 x 576 Pixel, PAL, 25 fps, 6000 Kbits/sec Audio: MPEG Layer 2, 224 Kbits/sec 16 Bit, Stereo 44.1 KHz File Type: MPEG-2 (DVD Compatible) |
| TMPEG 4.5 | Version: 4.5.1.254 Vieo: Terminator 2 SE DVD (720x576, 16:9) 5 Minutes Audio: Dolby Digital, 48000 Hz, 6-Kanal, English Advanced Acoustic Engine MP3 Encoder (160 kbps, 44.1 KHz) |
| DivX 6.8.3 | Version: 6.8.3 == Main Menu == default == Codec Menu == Encoding mode: Insane Quality Enhanced multithreading Enabled using SSE4 Quarter-pixel search == Video Menu == Quantization: MPEG-2 |
| Xvid 1.1.3 | Version: 1.1.3 Other Options / Encoder Menu -Display encoding status = off |
| Mainconcept Reference 1.5.1 Reference H.264 Plugin Pro 1.5.1 | Version: 1.5.1 MPEG2 to MPEG2 (H.264) MainConcept H.264/AVC Codec 28 sec HDTV 1920x1080 (MPEG2) Audio: MPEG2 (44.1 kHz, 2 Channel, 16 Bit, 224 kbps) Codec: H.264 Mode: PAL (25 FPS) Profile: Tom's Hardware Settings for Qct-Core |
| Adobe Premiere Pro CS3 HDTV Mainconcept H.264 Plugin 3.2 Windows Media Encoder 9.1 AP HDTV Windows Audio Encoder 10 Pro | Version: 3.0 NTSC MPEG2-HDTV 1920x1080 (24 sec) Import: Mainconcept NTSC HDTV 1080i Export: Adobe Media Encoder == Video == Windows Media Video 9 Advanced Profile Encoding Passes: one Bitrate Mode: Constant Frame: 1920x1080 Frame Rate: 29.97 Maximum Bitrate [kbps]: 2000 Image Quality: 50.00 == Audio == Windows Media Audio 10 Professional Encoding Passes: one Bitrate Mode: Constant Audio Format: 160 kbps, 44.1 kHz, 2 channel 16 bit (A/V) CBR |
| Application Benchmarks and Settings | |
|---|---|
| Benchmarks | Details |
| Grisoft AVG Anti-Virus 8 | Version: 8.0.134 Virus base: 270.4.5/1533 Benchmark Scan: some compressed ZIP and RAR archives |
| WinRar 3.8 | Version 3.80 BETA 4 WinZIP Commandline Version 2.3 Compression = Best Dictionary = 4096 KB Benchmark: THG-Workload |
| WinZip 11 | Version 11.2 (8094) Compression = Best Benchmark: THG-Workload |
| Maxon Cinema 4D Release 10 | Version: 10.008 Rendering from a scene (Water drop at a Rose) Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - 8Bit (50 frames) |
| Adobe Photoshop CS 3 | Version: 10.0x20070321, Filtering a 69 MB TIF-Photo, Benchmark: Tomshardware-Benchmark V1.0.0.4, Programmed by Tomshardware using Delphi 2007, Filters: Crosshatch Glass Sumi-e Accented Edges Angled Strokes Sprayed Strokes |
| Deep Fritz 11 | Version: 11 Fritz Chess Benchmark Version 4.2 |
| Synthetic Benchmarks and Settings | |
|---|---|
| Benchmarks | Details |
| 3DMark Vantage | Version: 1.02, Options: Performance, Graphics Test 1, Graphics Test 2, CPU Test 1, CPU Test 2 |
| PCMark Vantage | Version: 1.00, PCMark Benchmark, Memories Benchmark, Windows Media Player 10.00.00.3646 |
Zotac GeForce GTX 260² 55 nm
Western Digital VelociRaptor 300 GB
Topics being discussed on the forums
- What is the best phenom II to overclock on a budget. [Overclocking]
- K9A2 Platinum phenom II Overclocking? [Overclocking]
- Phenom II X4 955 or core I5 2.6GGHZ [CPU & Components]
- 2000MHz RAM Compatibility with Phenom II 955 BE [Motherboards & Memory]
- Phenom II 720 [Overclocking]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
- 1 / 2
- Next
-
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Can I reuse the CPU?
- Looking to upgrade, thinking about Intel i7
- E7400 or Phenom 8450/8850, which to choose?
- Best cooler for phenom II x4 940?????
- Stricly Gaming computer
- Jumpstarting my AMD 5000 BE, but I need my hand held
- Low profile cooler?
- 2 xfx 9800gt sli overclocking
- Check this out guys my amd phenom 710 overclock 3.6ghz with pics
- Safe Overclock for Stock Phenom II X3 720?
- New AM3 Motherboards Asus/Gigabyte
- What are good timings with DDR3 memory?
- OCZ PC2 Memory runs half speed on M2N-MX SE Plus
- 8GB pc 8500 running at 677- How can i raise it to 1066?
Best offers
|
Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor... | $349.99 Dell Home More info |
|
Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor... | $199.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Quad... | $185.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i7 Extreme Edition I7-975 Quad... | $974.97 TigerDirect More info |
|
Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Quad... | $169.99 TigerDirect More info |
Popular Searches
- velociraptor 300
- toms hardware velociraptor
- sata 300 compatible
- velociraptor 300 review
- velociraptor western digital toms hardware
- toms hardware cpu table
- set default codecs
- tom s hardware western digital velociraptor
- h.264 codec for vista
- dolby digital for windows media player 10
- test geforce gtx260
- toms hardware graphic test
- fritz benchmark version 4.2
- velociraptor 300 gb review
- amd v intel fritz chess benchmark
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
Interactive Boogy
Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
|
action :
Yoyo the Star
Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
|
Ads










Great article! As always, Tom's showing another point of view for handling your hardware. And, yeah, Fusion works Bigtime! Better performance guaranteed.
Good article, I have always been curious about how effective certain clock increases would actually be; especially for locked AMD cpus as you have to retard the ram frequency to get the core clock up higher which may result in a bottleneck.
Useful article.
About the higher-than-spec voltage applied - however, it is not recommand to set higher that safety limit (recommanded by AMD) voltage AND CnQ enabled together - the CPU could become much less overclockable after a short period, due to damage by switching voltage up and down from unsafe voltage.
Useful article for amd users. We are waiting like this article for core i7 cpus too.
Well I'm already running my Phenom II 940 at 3.6, but I'm doing this with a mix of lower multiplier than 18 and slightly higher HTT clock, I'm running at 17.5x206=3605, ofcourse @ 1.4v.. I think it's a good idea to try the same overclocking speed but with the higher HTT clock, as this will increase the performance a little ( RAM will be overclocked too ).. it will be harder I know but it may worth the try...
ehh "But how far should you go? Efficiency has become almost equally important to performance," efficiency is more like the opposite of performance with overclockers really!
It's pointles to even consider efficiency as an overclocker! It's a bit like trying to tune a H2 for economy instead of torque or high rev horsepower .... you shouldn't have picked a H2 in the first place if efficiency is a concern.
Power saving features for when systems aren't doing anything are welcome, but anything else is imo irrelevant.
Indeed a Nice article after a Much time on Tomshardware, Straight and Up to the point in describing about the benefits of Overclocking..
Indeed a nice article. What i don't really "get" is why a Jetway mainboard was used? I can't even find a retailer in europe that has it on sale...
Hey Chris, thanks for getting the site's metadata updated. The charts became visible while I was reading this article.
Neiroatopelcc has a point, but Fusion should address that. Striving for performance does not mean striving for waste, it means ignoring it. Well, I don't think anyone would argue that ignorance is a good thing. People will be able to OC to the teeth when they need it, but still be efficient when they don't.
Great Overclocking article, but how about an underclocking article for the HTPC crowd? I'm kinda curious how much power different Phenom IIs use between 800 mhz & 2 ghz.
i still cant understand why does the i7 965 is 4x expensive than 940 ?
i still cant understand why does the i7 965 is 4x expensive than 940 ?
Because bragging rights are important to people with small genitalia, and they don't mind paying for that privilege.
Because bragging rights are important to people with small genitalia, and they don't mind paying for that privilege.
Not everyone likes to oc? although i don't get why you would go 965 over 920 unless that kind of money meant little difference to you.
what is fun about all this coments is that despite all things you say
im from argentina and this OC does not exist here jajaja
and in addition we have the devaluation of our money and it cost to us almost 4 times what costs you anything
example here a core 2 duo e8400 costs 800 pesos ... that is 220 dolars + -
and i presume that even that in where you live isnt the real cost... instead much lower
great page toms hardware by the way... the only thing is that everything is so expensive that i can only see the things but dont have it jajaja
yeah, ariel is right.. im from Argentina too.. as a computer technician i've seen a lot of monsters (super mega cooled I7's super mega overclocked Phenom's) but is not normal. i was thinkin on buying a system like this one (i cant afford a 1100 Watts PSU so i will go for something like 600 to 750W) and with that money me and my girlfriend live 3 months(including taxes). jejeje (no display included in the prize 'coz i already have a monitor).. I can't find anything that sounds similar to "Jetway" here.. so maybe i'll go for a MSI mother.. But i still have doubts as for the cooling.. What cooling solution was used in this article? stock cooler? the on ei see in the picture looks like a zalman or something like that.. can anyone answer that for me?..
Thanks in advance
Tom
I agree, this seems to be an usefull article. But as was said in the above, could it be possible to see an article where that "sweet point" 3.6 Ghz would be achieved using different HTT clock? Is it really worth of it? How it affects the power consumption? Maybe a very little, but it would be nice to see!
You all ready have proven that 3.6 GHz is the sweet point with normal HTT clocks, can the situation be different with different HTT settings? Or is it too much relative to the individual CPU you hapens to have?
All is all this was interesting article to read! Keep it up!
Very nice article
I was considering buying something a little more fancy than my OCZ Vanquisher so that i could go above 1.4v, but apparently there's no point, so thank you for saving me ~$100CDN.
There are still some unresolved questions here. Why a Jetway mobo with a 790GX chipset? Something with a 790FX would have made more sense. Why would you leave CNQ on during overclocking? The first thing every OC guide will tell you is to TURN CNQ OFF. Also, how much does power consumption/temperature increase as NB frequency goes up? i.e. if you increase the reference clock, rather than the multi, the NB freq. goes up. How does that impact stability/power consumption/temperature?
Still some mysteries here, but a nice article nonetheless.
To Chris or someone,
I dont know if the other users are experiencing this but every few pages I click through on this site, especially during the articles, I get a message from my antivirus alerting me of a virus from a file when im loading a new page. I click "Deny" each time and all seems well.
Virus: HEUR:Trojan.Script.Iframer
File: http://ad.trafficmp.com/a/js?plid=10637
Im using Firefox, Windows 7 build 7000, and Kaspersky for AV
Coop--let me report this and see what happens. The malware issue we saw before was solved. I sincerely hope this isn't something new. Thanks for the heads-up!
This article is exactly how i overclock. Default voltage max stable, and then i back it off a little bit, or ill do a tiny increase in voltage but no more.
Anything more then that are for 2 reason:
1) Bragging rights
2) People who don't care about the cost of their computer parts.
If you have money to buy the latest and greatest every time it comes out and are changing hardware every 6 months, by all means push the chip to the limit and throw the voltage up, who cares if it frys.
But its kinda funny when you see someone on a budget pushing their hardware with massive voltage increases ets, its just dumb if you cant afford to fry it.