Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Six New CPUs From AMD

Six New Phenom II And Athlon II CPUs From AMD
By

This is the third time this year that AMD has provided a 100 MHz speed bump across the Athlon II line, while lowering prices on existing SKUs and selling the new processors at the same price as the previous flagship models. A 100 MHz speed bump is hard to get excited about, but a 300 MHz boost across the whole Athlon II portfolio over a year--with decreased pricing--is a respectable increase overall.

This time things are a little different, as the Phenom II lineup is also involved. The new dual- and quad-core models get the same 100 MHz bump we’ve seen before. But there’s also a new hexa-core model that sports a 200 MHz increase over the existing Phenom II X6 1055T.

All of these processors are built on the same 45 nm process and architecture that AMD has relied on since the Phenom II and Athlon II CPUs were introduced, so we don’t expect any miracles. We’ll probably see the same overclocking headroom to which we're accustomed from AMD’s existing models. Instead, we’ll have to wait for the new Fusion-based CPUs, slated for 32 nm manufacturing, to get a processor from the company to change that expectation. Of course, sometimes, a new processor revision increases overclocking headroom a little. We test this in the benchmarks below.

Phenom II X6 1075T


Phenom II X6 1055T
Phenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1090T BE
Codename: ThubanThubanThuban
Process: 45 nm 45 nm 45 nm
CPU Cores: 6
6
6
Clock Speed (Max Turbo): 2.8 GHz (3.3 GHz)
3.0 GHz (3.5 GHz)3.2 GHz (3.6 GHz)
Socket: AM2+/AM3AM2+/AM3AM2+/AM3
L1 Cache: 6 x 128 KB
6 x 128 KB6 x 128 KB
L2 Cache: 6 x 512 KB
6 x 512 KB6 x 512 KB
L3 Cache: 6 MB
6 MB6 MB
HyperTransport: 4000 MT/s4000 MT/s4000 MT/s
Thermal Envelope:
125 W
125 W125 W

The new hexa-core Phenom II X6 1075T fills the gap between the ~$200 Phenom II X6 1055T and the ~$310 Phenom II X6 1090T. The new Phenom II X6 1075T costs $245 and is also priced between Intel’s Core i5-760 and the Core i7 models.

This chip sports a 3.0 GHz base clock speed and can operate as fast as 3.5 GHz in Turbo CORE mode. It's interesting that the Phenom II X6 1090T Black Edition processor offers a 200 MHz gain over the new Phenom II X6 1075T's base clock, but only a 100 MHz higher maximum turbo clock. This is likely due to the limitations of squeezing the processor within the same 125 W power envelope.

Phenom II X4 970 Black Edition


Phenom II X4 970Phenom II X4 965
Codename: DenebDeneb
Process: 45 nm 45 nm
CPU Cores: 4
4
Clock Speed: 3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket: AM2+/AM3AM2+/AM3
L1 Cache: 4 x 128 KB
4 x 128 KB
L2 Cache: 4 x 512 KB
4 x 512 KB
L3 Cache: 6 MB
6 MB
HyperTransport: 4000 MT/s4000 MT/s
Thermal Envelope:
125 W
125 W

It’s been a little over a year since the introduction of AMD’s Phenom II X4 965, a CPU that relinquished its flagship billing with the introduction of the Phenom II X6.

We’re a little disappointed that we’ve waited this long for a mere 100 MHz increase to the Phenom II X4 line. But at $185, the new Phenom II X4 970 remains slightly cheaper than its Intel rival, the Core i5-750. Of course, as a Black Edition processor, the CPU multiplier remains unlocked for overclocking enthusiasts.

Phenom II X2 560 Black Edition


Phenom II X2 560Phenom II X2 555
Codename: CalistoCalisto
Process: 45 nm 45 nm
CPU Cores: 2 2
Clock Speed: 3.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket: AM2+/AM3AM2+/AM3
L1 Cache: 2 x 128 KB
2 x 128 KB
L2 Cache: 2 x 512 KB
2 x 512 KB
L3 Cache: 6 MB
6 MB
HyperTransport: 4000 MT/s4000 MT/s
Thermal Envelope:
80 W
80 W

The new Phenom II X2 560 replaces the Phenom II X2 555 in much the same fashion that the Phenom II X2 555 replaced the Phenom II X2 550 in January of this year. Despite the slight 100 MHz increase to 3.3 GHz, the price point remains the same, at $105. The new model also sports an unlocked multiplier ratio. And like any dual-core Phenom II processor, there is a chance that the dormant CPU cores might be successfully enabled through the unlocking features included with some motherboards.

Athlon II X4 645


Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640
Codename: PropusPropus
Process: 45 nm 45 nm
CPU Cores: 4
4
Clock Speed: 3.1 GHz
3.0 GHz
Socket: AM2+/AM3AM2+/AM3
L1 Cache:   4 x 128 KB
4 x 128 KB
L2 Cache:   4 x 512 KB
4 x 512 KB
HyperTransport: 4000 MT/s
4000 MT/s
Thermal Envelope:
95 W
95 W

The new Athlon II X4 645 pushes budget quad-core performance 100 MHz over the 3.0 GHz level. At $122, it offers what seems like a solid combination of multi-threaded performance and a high clock speed.

Athlon II X3 450


Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445
Codename: RanaRana
Process: 45 nm 45 nm
CPU Cores: 3
3
Clock Speed: 3.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket: AM2+/AM3AM2+/AM3
L1 Cache:   3 x 128 KB
3 x 128 KB
L2 Cache:   3 x 512 KB
3 x 512 KB
HyperTransport: 4000 MT/s
4000 MT/s
Thermal Envelope:
95 W
95 W

At 3.2 GHz, the Athlon II X3 450 is no slouch. The triple-core threat has become our favorite sub-$100 gaming processor, and we’re fans of the new model’s $87 MSRP. With three processing cores, this CPU naturally handles multi-tasking much better than its dual-core competitors.

Athlon II X2 265


Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 260
Codename: RegorRegor
Process: 45 nm 45 nm
CPU Cores: 2 2
Clock Speed: 3.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket: AM2+/AM3AM2+/AM3
L1 Cache: 2 x 128 KB
2 x 128 KB
L2 Cache: 2 x 1 MB
2 x 1 MB
HyperTransport: 4000 MT/s
4000 MT/s
Thermal Envelope:
65 W
65 W

The Athlon II X2 260 is a dual-core CPU with a clock rate of 3.3 GHz, and is probably more powerful than what most productivity-based office users require. At $76, budget-constrained gamers and enthusiasts should instead spend the extra $10 on AMD's Athlon II X3 450. But the new dual-core option promises reasonable performance for basic budget PC users.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 75 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 18 Hide
    eklipz330 , September 21, 2010 4:27 AM
    aznshinobiDo I hear comeback from AMD? Hopefully the Bulldozer shows results with the AM3+/AM3r2 in benchs.

    this is hardly a comeback, they simply filled in segments on the price range with not-so-new products. a little bump in speed, probably better binned, and a few more bucks. seems like the logical thing to do at this point, until bulldozer anyhow
  • 10 Hide
    cleeve , September 21, 2010 5:26 AM
    MoreCores...1075T can not, and it's more expensive than i7 920.


    At $145, he 1075T is $40 cheaper than any Core i7 I can find online.
Other Comments
  • 1 Hide
    aznshinobi , September 21, 2010 4:20 AM
    Do I hear comeback from AMD? Hopefully the Bulldozer shows results with the AM3+/AM3r2 in benchs.
  • 7 Hide
    gkay09 , September 21, 2010 4:23 AM
    Good article and the 1075T is a good addition to the 6-Core line...
    And most of all, thanks for confirming that all the current socket will be replaced next year including AMD.
  • 1 Hide
    scifi9000 , September 21, 2010 4:25 AM
    I'd love to see these new chips pitted against the T1000 processor.
  • 18 Hide
    eklipz330 , September 21, 2010 4:27 AM
    aznshinobiDo I hear comeback from AMD? Hopefully the Bulldozer shows results with the AM3+/AM3r2 in benchs.

    this is hardly a comeback, they simply filled in segments on the price range with not-so-new products. a little bump in speed, probably better binned, and a few more bucks. seems like the logical thing to do at this point, until bulldozer anyhow
  • -6 Hide
    duk3 , September 21, 2010 4:28 AM
    I'd rather it was a 970T at 3.6 ghz with turbo up to 4.1ghz.
    Then again, who wouldn't?
  • 4 Hide
    Gin Fushicho , September 21, 2010 5:06 AM
    I'm still waiting for Bulldozer, I hope that Bulldozer makes AMD king again. If so I'll buy another AMD system. I've been waiting since the early Dualcore Windsor cores.
  • 4 Hide
    spentshells , September 21, 2010 5:12 AM
    nothing new here good on AMD if they keep the prices the same
    the 645 and 450 are really crazy good deals
  • 10 Hide
    cleeve , September 21, 2010 5:26 AM
    MoreCores...1075T can not, and it's more expensive than i7 920.


    At $145, he 1075T is $40 cheaper than any Core i7 I can find online.
  • 3 Hide
    TheStealthyOne , September 21, 2010 5:30 AM
    Yay! :) 
  • -1 Hide
    idoln95 , September 21, 2010 5:34 AM
    are these temps with stock cooler? they seem to be a big off...


    oh sorry, missed the minus ambient part...

    wow, thats kinda hot.... (30C ambient in here :(  )
  • 0 Hide
    RazberyBandit , September 21, 2010 5:34 AM
    CleeveAt $145, he 1075T is $40 cheaper than any Core i7 I can find online.

    I think you meant $245, Don.

    I find it great to see the Phenom II 970 still capable of Cool'n'Quiet idle mode while overclocked. C'n'Q doesn't work on my 720BE at any speed over 3.2GHz. Is that something common to the C3-Stepping models?
  • 9 Hide
    AMW1011 , September 21, 2010 5:38 AM
    Holy shit, 3.5 Ghz stock. I know it really doesn't mean much, but I still like the sound of that.
  • 9 Hide
    scrumworks , September 21, 2010 6:07 AM
    Sandra is very bad synthetic benchmark. It clearly favors Intel architecture and the differences are not that dramatic in real world applications. With enough bribes you seemingly can get nice optimizations.
  • 3 Hide
    dirtmountain , September 21, 2010 7:04 AM
    A very well written article. It covered all the bases and was very informative. Damn good work, it's why people check in at Tom's Hardware.
  • 2 Hide
    jgv115 , September 21, 2010 7:30 AM
    I'm happy that my Core i5 750 stands up to 2 updates (speed bumps) of the Phenom II 955 (the 965 and 970). It even beats the 1075T!

    I think the 750 is still the better CPU in it's price range.
  • 0 Hide
    liquidsnake718 , September 21, 2010 7:41 AM
    Yeah there should hve been at least a core i3 fo good measure against the AMD 2's...
  • 3 Hide
    ThePeacemaker10 , September 21, 2010 8:33 AM
    How are the StarCraft 2 benchmarks possible? I NEVER drop below 55 fps and I'm using an Athlon II X3 445 with an HD 5750 and 4 GB of RAM. I don't get it.
  • 1 Hide
    ThePeacemaker10 , September 21, 2010 8:42 AM
    ThePeacemaker10How are the StarCraft 2 benchmarks possible? I NEVER drop below 55 fps and I'm using an Athlon II X3 445 with an HD 5750 and 4 GB of RAM. I don't get it.


    I should also mention I'm running on High with 1680x1050 resolution.
Display more comments