Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Power Supply Recommendations

Power Supply Reference: Consumption, Savings, And More
By

When you are shopping for a new power supply, take several factors into account. First, consider the power supply’s shape, or form factor. Power supply form factors can differ in their physical sizes, shapes, screw-hole positions, connector types, and fan locations. When ordering a replacement supply, you need to know which form factor your system requires.

Some systems use proprietary power supply designs, which makes replacement more difficult. If a system uses one of the industry-standard form factor power supplies, replacement units with a variety of output levels and performance are available from hundreds of vendors. An unfortunate user of a system with a nonstandard form factor supply does not have this kind of choice and must get a replacement from the original manufacturer of the system—and usually must pay a much higher price for the unit. PC buyers often overlook this and discover too late the consequences of having nonstandard components in a system.

Name-brand systems on both the low and high end of the price scale are notorious for using proprietary form factor power supplies. For example, Dell has used proprietary supplies in many of its systems. Be sure you consider this if you intend to own or use these types of systems out of warranty or plan significant upgrades during the life of the system. Where possible, I always insist on systems that use industry-standard power supplies, such as the ATX12V form factor supply found in most systems today.

With backward compatibility ensuring that the new 24-pin ATX power connector will plug into older 20-pin motherboard sockets, when purchasing a new power supply, I now recommend only those units that include 24-pin main power connectors, which are usually sold as ATX12V 2.x, EPS12V, or “PCI Express” models. For the most flexible and future-proof supply, also ensure that the power supply includes two or more PCI Express graphics connectors as well as multiple integrated SATA drive power connectors. Choosing a power supply with these features provides flexibility that allows it to work not only in newer systems, but also in virtually all older ATX systems—and with no adapters required.

As a guide, here are some of the features I recommend looking for in a PSU:

  • Adequate power connectors (24-pin main, 4/8-pin +12 V CPU, 6/8-pin PCIe Graphics, SATA, and so on) for the intended system
  • Adequate power output (watts) for the intended system
  • 80 PLUS certification
  • Active Power Factor Correction (required with 80 PLUS)
  • SLI and/or Crossfire certification
  • Single +12 V rail design


There are other variables to consider, depending on your specific needs or desires. One feature that many people like is modular cables, which minimize the clutter in a system. Another feature to consider is noise, which is mostly related to cooling. The type and arrangement of cooling fans has a great effect on how quiet (or noisy) the unit will be. There are even some fanless units that are completely silent, but these usually come at a premium price and with a lower overall power output capability.

When building systems with case windows, some people also like to look for PSUs with appearance-related features like colored cases.

Modular Cables

One feature often discussed in relation to PSUs is the use of modular cables. This means cables with connectors at both ends that are detachable from the power supply. Modular cables allow you to attach only the cables you need—in some cases greatly reducing the congestion inside the system.

The main argument against modular cables is that additional resistance is introduced via another set of connector contacts. This is true, but how much resistance exactly, and is it enough that it really matters? Fortunately, this can easily be calculated.

The connectors used in modern power supplies are mostly Molex Mini-Fit Jr. types, which have a contact resistance of 10 milli-ohms (0.01 ohms). Most power supply cables use 18 AWG (American Wire Gauge) copper wire, which has a resistance of about 0.0064 ohms per foot. This means that adding an extra connector at the PSU end is equal to about 1.5 feet of wire in additional resistance.

To put it another way, in a maximum load situation, each terminal normally carries a maximum of about four amps, at which point the additional resistance equals about 0.16 watts of power loss. In an eight-pin power connector, this only adds up to around a watt, a loss I consider negligible.

Finally, when you consider that a typical PSU cable already consists of 1.5 feet of wire with a connector on the end, adding another connector to make the cable modular only adds about one-third more overall resistance to what is already there, which was negligible to begin with.

If modular cables aren’t much of a problem technically, why don’t more PSU manufacturers include them? Well, besides the (negligible in my opinion) extra resistance, they do add to the cost of making a power supply, and that is reflected in a higher final price. They can also create clearance issues with other components in the system, depending on exactly where the connectors attach to the PSU. In addition, modular cables can easily become lost or misplaced. Think of opening a system to add another internal drive or upgraded video card several years after it was initially built, finding that the PSU uses modular cables, and discovering the extra cables needed are nowhere to be found. One solution to this problem is to place any unused cables inside the case when building a system. For example, you could place them in a small plastic bag and tape them inside, so that if or when you need them in the future, they are easy to find. Besides these issues, perhaps the biggest drawback to modular cables is that modular PSU cables using standard connectors are patented (www.google.com/
patents/about?id=w0ehAAAAEBAJ), and the patent is owned by Systemax (aka TigerDirect and Ultra Products). There is another patent on modular PSUs that use nonstandard connectors at the PSU end (www.google.com/patents/about?id=iOGqAAAAEBAJ). If there was no legal “baggage” against using them, I suspect we would see more modular cable equipped PSUs on the market today.

Display all 35 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 1 Hide
    de5_Roy , January 11, 2012 4:07 AM
    very informative!
  • 0 Hide
    palladin9479 , January 11, 2012 4:47 AM
    Holy cow. Thanks for that Asus PSU link. I now know what's causing my system instability.

    AMD Phenom II x4 980BE OC'd
    4 x 4GB DDR3-1600 memory
    2x NVidia GTX-580 SLI'd
    4x SATA HDD's
    1x SATA DVDRW
    7x FANs (Water cooled system)

    Comes to 1150W recommended. I have a Corsair HX-1000 1000W PSU.
  • 0 Hide
    sincreator , January 11, 2012 4:57 AM
    Still running a Thermaltake 750w toughpower here. Been 5/6 years now. Man this PSU has seen some upgrades. lol. I'll probally buy another toughpower/Corsair sometime in the near future.(If this one ever dies. lol)
  • -4 Hide
    Dacatak , January 11, 2012 5:41 AM
    Still using the same Enermax Liberty 500W from 2006 for my new Sandy Bridge upgrade with GTX 560Ti.
    The only reason you'd need more than 500W is if you need to power more than one GPU.

    Of course, as stated in the article, not all 500W PSUs are equal. The Enermax Liberty was among the best 500W PSUs in its day, and its quality is still exceptional even by today's standards.
    It has dual 12V rails with 22A on each with a combined output of 32A total. Most of the dual-rail 500W PSUs sold nowadays max out at 18A per rail.

    The Enermax was definitely ahead of its time, and in general, PSUs sold directly by their manufacturer (OEMs such as Enermax, FSP, Kingwin, Seasonic) tend to be of superior quality than those sold by third-party rebranders (Antec, OCZ, Thermaltake, Corsair, etc.).
  • 7 Hide
    cumi2k4 , January 11, 2012 8:22 AM
    Was wondering about power cycling and thermal shock... The article said that thermal shock from powering on & off can cause deterioration in a system. You suggest S3 (Suspend to Ram), but does this also cause thermal shock to the system when resuming from sleep mode?
  • 2 Hide
    lordvj , January 11, 2012 11:59 AM
    ^ this. was wondering the same thing
  • 2 Hide
    jaquith , January 11, 2012 2:37 PM
    Great article and thanks, it'll 'hopefully' make my job easier in the Forum and stop the silly arguments I have recommending PSU's. I really wish folks would stop skimping on their PSU's on nice systems.

    Another important point that folks have a tendency to forget is 'electrolytic capacitor aging' which over time takes their once 650W and after a year or so reduces it to 520W~500W aka Capacitor Aging.

    Great PSU Sizer -> http://www.thermaltake.outervision.com/
    Peak:
    100% CPU Utilization (TDP)
    100% System Load
    30%~35% for Capacitor Aging
  • 0 Hide
    zak_mckraken , January 11, 2012 2:40 PM
    @cumi2k4 and lordvj : We can only assume it does cause a thermal shock, since only the RAM retains power in S3 mode. The other unpowered components thus cool down during stand by mode, like a regular shutdown.

    Very informative article by the way!
  • 1 Hide
    TeraMedia , January 11, 2012 2:40 PM
    @palladin9479:

    Yeah, me too! I had significantly underbudgeted power for fans (9), ODD/HDDs (8) and USB devices (3), and was going nuts trying to figure out why the system was unstable at times. I thought I had a bad MoBo, or HDDs, or GPU, or ??!?!@#$? Now I know.
  • 1 Hide
    xenol , January 11, 2012 3:04 PM
    I'm kind of suspect about the ASUS power supply link. It tells me for my old system, I should get a 600W power supply but I ran a 500W on it for years without problem.
  • 0 Hide
    Onus , January 11, 2012 3:35 PM
    The statement about third party rebranders depends on who the OEM is. If Seasonic or Delta makes it (e.g. most Antec units), it is going to be a good PSU. Many Corsair and XFX are made by Seasonic too. Channel Well, Sirtec, and some others have some units that aren't so great.

    I found the article of some interest (and will revisit the sleep settings on my own system), but some of it was also years out of date. That's probably hard to avoid on a writing project of this magnitude.
  • 5 Hide
    chaz_music , January 11, 2012 3:38 PM
    Good collection of interesting PSU topics. I especially liked the ACPI information. I have several comments and suggestions to change in the article though. I work in the PSU industry and can shed some light on a few issues.

    On efficiency, most people leave out the fact that we tend to use air conditioning here in the USA a good part of the year. Here in the mid Atlantic, we tend to use A/C for about ~ 7 months annually. This adds a thermal penalty to any heat that you dump into the office/home air during those months. With most A/C systems, the cost to remove 1W of heat is an additional 0.5W of A/C power (50% overhead). Taking the above numbers and some rounding, I use an overhead rating of 30% total for any heat dumped into my home / office. So take your power loss numbers and multiply by 1.30 to get the total cost impact to your wallet. This also should be done for using CFL and LED lighting. They are not allowed to use A/C cost in their advertising, so the public does not get to see the true possible savings.

    There are several types of UPS systems that you should write about. The one you outlined is called a double conversion unit, which is always processing the power to give a clean regulated sine wave output. These are the least efficient and most expensive though. Double conversion is always taking the AC input, making DC, and using a PWM inverter to make regulated AC again for the output. Double conversion efficiencies are typically around 88-90% efficient, so this can impact you total system efficiency and operational costs. A cheaper UPS is the standby type, which allows the raw utility power to go straight to the load with some light duty surge clamping in between. When the input power voltage goes out of bounds, there is a switch over that is usually around 4-8msec which is faster than the PSU hold up time of 20msec. Since normal operation is straight pass through, the usual efficiency is close to 100% (minus the UPS internal power needs and charging). Note though that some UPS systems are crap and can use upwards to 100W just being plugged in.

    I did not follow your discussion on the alarm buzzer indicating overcharge, which should never happen in any UPS. Most modern UPS system implement a battery test to make sure that the battery capacity and internal resistance is able to hold up the load. If the battery fails, they set off the buzzer. In almost all UPS systems, a buzzer alarm is critical - something is wrong. Some UPS systems also monitor the ground feed continuity and will alarm if the input feed ground starts to float making the UPS and the load unsafe to touch.

    The UPS output waveforms are not all sine wave. Often the double conversion types are sine wave, adding to their cost. The standby UPS systems are usually step wave which is also called quasi-sine which is marketing term for step wave (to confuse the buyer). Most PC loads and monitors work fine with step wave (and are even more efficient on step wave!), although some PFC PSUs have problems. Magnetic loads can have real heartburn with step wave (motors, transformers) due to high losses and non-sinusoid voltage waveform effects.

    Ferroresonant transformers are good voltage regulators, but the way they work is very lossy. A good ferro will only run around 90% efficiency. If your load is attached to a ferro, you are adding another power loss in your system. In my opinion, you are better off spend a few more dollars and getting a UPS (which there are ferro types still out there also).

    There is no mention of oversizing your PSU also. Many HTPC and SOHO/home server needs are on 24/7 so power usage and efficiency are paramount to the cost of use / ownership. If you install an oversized PSU, you are taking a efficiency hit (for most brands) that increases your energy usage. The 80 Plus standards do not test below 20% load, so the efficiency of most PSU designs drop off quickly below 20% load. I have seen several that are below 50% with 10% loading. A good analogy on oversizing that I have used before is thinking about car engines. You cannot get a V8 car engine to run as efficiently as a 4 cylinder due to the physics (more friction/mass, etc.). That same effect occurs in a PSU. Larger magnetics, power devices, and other overhead lowers the efficiency at low power. proper sizing can save a good bit of money. Just don't get it too small, especially thinking about system start up (HDD spin up, fans, CPU local PSUs ramping up, etc.).

    You comment on thermal shock is great, but there are many other factors to consider in reliability. Spinning down any HDD and fan loads reduces bearing wear for those mechanical parts. But keeping the main motherboard PCB powered and some operation continuing also helps with reliability. The minor amount of heat that is generated helps keep the PCB dry (PCB material is hydroscopic!), which one major part of the high voltage area in a PSU failing after a long storage (like right after purchase) causing a DOA. And as others pointed out in the comments, allowing the system to go into a sleep state will also cause a cool down thermal shock. The biggest problem with thermal shock is that it break solder joints and helps break bond wires/connections in ICs. It also speeds up electrolytic cap leaking and shortens the life. Does anyone remember the motherboard cap failure from a few years ago?

    The absolute largest cause of computer failures is caused by ESD damage. The data from companies that keep statistics on this unanimously show this as a fact, but the PC enthusiast industry does not work to educate the end users of this well at all. In the electronics industry as a whole, ESD accounts for nearly 55-60% of all failures! This includes component suppliers, etc. So if you want a great topic for a future article, tackle ESD. It is real and it is very costly when ignored. Ever had a PC part that was DOA, i.e., that just "did not work at all" when powered up the first time and would not work at all? Good chance it was ESD.

    Thanks for the article.
  • 3 Hide
    george21546 , January 11, 2012 3:52 PM
    Buy a power meter kill-o-watt comes to mind. Cost 15-20 and will tell you amps, watts, power factor and cycles per second. Best of all it will measure watts over time so you can check how much your system is using in each of it's states. I like to oversize power supplies by 25% unless upgrades are planned.
  • 0 Hide
    chris maple , January 11, 2012 6:48 PM
    The low ends of the ranges shown are too high. Discrete video cards are available that use less than 10 watts, same for hard drives. Motherboards rarely exceed 25 watts.
    My system has an Intel Core I7-870, discrete video card, 2x2G RAM, 2 1Tbyte hard drives, an SSD and a DVD burner. It usually runs at 70 watts and has never exceeded 200 watts driven hard.
  • 0 Hide
    ethaniel , January 11, 2012 8:49 PM
    I thought it was only -5% tolerance for the -/+12v rail. Good data.
  • 0 Hide
    BlackHawk91 , January 11, 2012 10:22 PM
    Would enabling the S3 sleep mode interfere with OC settings and/or performance?
  • 0 Hide
    hardcore_gamer , January 12, 2012 12:12 PM
    palladin9479Holy cow. Thanks for that Asus PSU link. I now know what's causing my system instability.AMD Phenom II x4 980BE OC'd4 x 4GB DDR3-1600 memory2x NVidia GTX-580 SLI'd4x SATA ......


    You have a serious bottleneck there bro ;) . Time to upgrade the CPU.
  • 0 Hide
    g-unit1111 , January 12, 2012 10:50 PM
    palladin9479Holy cow. Thanks for that Asus PSU link. I now know what's causing my system instability.AMD Phenom II x4 980BE OC'd4 x 4GB DDR3-1600 memory2x NVidia GTX-580 SLI'd4x SATA HDD's1x SATA DVDRW7x FANs (Water cooled system)Comes to 1150W recommended. I have a Corsair HX-1000 1000W PSU.


    Yeah... that floored me as well, mine is 900 minimum.

    1 x AMD Phenom II X6 1055T OC'd
    2 x Geforce GTX 550TI
    4 x 4GB DDR3
    1 x SSD
    2 x HD
    2 x DVD-RW
    5 x CPU fans (double heat sink)

    I know now what's causing most of my heat issues is that I'm running an underpowered PSU (Corsair 750). I will definitely make this my next upgrade.

    And that thing about putting systems to sleep, I'll do that more often.
  • 0 Hide
    palladin9479 , January 12, 2012 11:57 PM
    Remember that ASUS link is calculating the approximate maximum power draw possible on your system. Basically with everything going full blast which doesn't happen too often.

    PSU's in general start to get stressed once their over 80% of their rated output. Prolonged stress can cause components to wear out much earlier then before. This is why a PSU may be fine for awhile but then start to have random issues six months or more after installation. I just didn't think I was burning that much juice, but now it seems I am.
  • 0 Hide
    A Bad Day , January 13, 2012 2:51 AM
    Just a question, is it worth watercooling a PSU? I know it would boost efficiency and allow it to put out higher watt than specified, but is it worth it?
Display more comments