Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Example 1: The Office PC

Picking The Right Power Supply: What You Should Know
By

Test Case 1: Office PC

Here’s a look at our standard office PC.

Office PC
CPU
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400

Motherboard
Abit I-N73H
RAM
2 x 2 GB DDR2 Kingston Value RAM
Graphics
On-board
Hard Drive
1 x 500 GB Western Digital Caviar Blue
Optical Drive
DVD burner
External Devices
Mouse, Keyboard
Power Draw, Idle
53 W
Power Draw, Normal Load
90 W
Power Draw, Full Load
122 W
Power Meter
Energy Logger 4000 (Conrad Electronic)

• Long-term measurements
• Monitoring
• Consumption measured up to 1.2 kW


Our goal is to find a suitable power supply for this job. We’ll have to ask our readers for forgiveness here, as this article originated with our German team from Stuttgart. While some of the power supplies used by our colleagues may not be available in the US, they still serve to illustrate the point quite well.

Also, we were hoping to use Huntkey’s Jumper 300 W 80 PLUS Gold as our standard. Sadly, the review sample we were promised got stuck somewhere between China and German customs and didn’t make it to the lab in time for this piece. That’s why the Super Flower 450 W Golden Green is taking its place today, despite being a bit on the beefy side for the job. So without further ado, here are our candidates:

ManufacturerModel
Certification
Price
Hardwaremania24
Standard ATX 420 W
none
$14 (€9.90)
LC-POWERLC6350 Super Silent 350 W
none
$28 (€19.90)
Be QuietPure PowerL7 300 W80 PLUS
$45 (€32.00)
RasurboReal & Power RAP 350 W 80 PLUS
$49 (€35.00)
Super Flower
Golden Green 450 W
80 PLUS Gold
$83 (€59.00)


Big Charts For Our Smallest System

Now for the big reveal. How do our various contenders stack up? Well, have a look for yourself. There are certainly some pronounced differences:

Nineteen watts separate the best and the worst power supply at idle, with Be Quiet and Rasurbo taking the top spots. The Gold-certified Super Flower model comes in third, with the two cheapest PSUs bringing up the rear.

That ranking doesn’t change much when we look at a normal usage scenario, where the difference between the first and last place shrinks to 11 W. However, Rasurbo and Be Quiet trade places, while the rest of the field stays unchanged.

Under load, the delta between our top performer and the worst offender increases to 14 W, with the Super Flower unit taking the lead ahead of Rasurbo and Be Quiet. Meanwhile, it seems that the efficiency curve of the super-cheap Hardwaremania24 PSU starts to fall off again, exposing this model as a rebadged 250 W model. If you want to try for 300 W with a PSU like that, keep a fire extinguisher handy.

Conclusion

In all three scenarios, the 80 PLUS-certified models take the top three spots. Interestingly, the Gold-certified Super Flower only comes out on top under full load. In this case, it doesn’t seem as though its higher price is really worth it. To be fair, it is penalized to some extent by being the highest-capacity model in this group. Super Flower does have one advantage, though, since its model is semi-passive. Under these loads, the fans don't spin up at all, making the Golden Green 450 W an interesting choice for a silent build.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 101 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 16 Hide
    iam2thecrowe , September 7, 2011 6:02 AM
    SteelCity1981Like the old saying goes... "You get what you pay for."

    unfortunately that is not always the case, you could buy a resonably expensive Thermaltake TR2 RX series and end up with a piece of crap.
  • 12 Hide
    fakie , September 7, 2011 5:29 AM
    DragonMegaHyperCombatUltra PSU

    i want
  • 10 Hide
    MrHull , September 7, 2011 10:42 AM
    Great article, even an idiot like me could understand it.
    Would like to see more articles written like this.
    Well written, and well done !!!
Other Comments
  • 8 Hide
    SteelCity1981 , September 7, 2011 4:43 AM
    Like the old saying goes... "You get what you pay for."
  • 10 Hide
    aliened , September 7, 2011 4:59 AM
    ^^^^ That's right. I just spent $180 bucks on a Corsair AX850 but I don't care 'cuz I know that I'm getting a great PSU with which I will rarely encounter any problems, my other hardware is safer and I have plenty of room to upgrade my system on a future. IMHO trying to save as much as possible on a cheap PSU is like playing Russian roulette.
  • 1 Hide
    g-unit1111 , September 7, 2011 5:12 AM
    After having two bad experiences with Ultra PSUs, I will never, ever use a no name, low budget PSU.
  • 2 Hide
    bennaye , September 7, 2011 5:18 AM
    The subheading "When Buying Cheap Can Be ReallyExpensive" has a typo, ie. missing a space in between the "Really" and "Expensive". Its on the 6th page , titled "Don't get burned; Safely before Stinginess". And imo, the "Safely" should be a "Safety".
  • 12 Hide
    fakie , September 7, 2011 5:29 AM
    DragonMegaHyperCombatUltra PSU

    i want
  • 7 Hide
    Zero_ , September 7, 2011 5:46 AM
    Quote:
    # Buying too big just to be on the safe side is counter-productive and only makes sense if you actually need the reserves.

    No one really listens to this.
  • 16 Hide
    iam2thecrowe , September 7, 2011 6:02 AM
    SteelCity1981Like the old saying goes... "You get what you pay for."

    unfortunately that is not always the case, you could buy a resonably expensive Thermaltake TR2 RX series and end up with a piece of crap.
  • 3 Hide
    ryandsouza , September 7, 2011 6:20 AM
    Learnt the hard way... Was using the PSU bundled with my case. It was the typical cheap, no-brand PSU. The PC was constantly crashing/ freezing and I never suspected the PSU. Ended up damaging 2 HDDs... Had to RMA both.

    Now I got a CM PSU and no problems since! :D 
  • 3 Hide
    hmp_goose , September 7, 2011 6:22 AM
    Old Skool PCP&C FTW!
  • 10 Hide
    amdfangirl , September 7, 2011 6:33 AM
    I have a fire extinguisher next to my computer.

    Helps keep the Phenom under control.
  • 8 Hide
    alhanelem , September 7, 2011 6:57 AM
    crap just realized my PSU has a passive PFC, gonna replace it ASAP
  • 3 Hide
    radium69 , September 7, 2011 7:00 AM
    No Super Flower Platinum 550W? I have one and they are damn efficient I can tell! ;) 
  • 8 Hide
    alidan , September 7, 2011 8:27 AM
    i thought i should give a bit of context here.

    most good psus are able to out live a pc build under 24/7 use, some able to last 10 years.

    where i live power costs 11 cents per kwatt. it should be 9 like my state average, but whatever, i wont go into that further here.

    now with 11 watts difference, over the coarse of 1 year under 24/7 use, that comes out to about 10$ and out national average is also 11.2 cents, so rounding down to 11 is appropriate.

    now here are some numbers, based on estamates.

    11 watts - 10$ a year
    22 watts - 20$ a year
    33 watts - 30$ a year

    and lets go with a pc thats built right lasts 4 years, and is used for 5 (waiting on parts to be released and such)
    base/4year/5year
    10/40/50
    20/80/100
    30/120/150

    basically you have to look at the long run, and anticipate a mid cycle upgrade, such as new gpu, with 50-100 more watts headroom.

    lets also assume that you turn the pc off at night, some people do, but leave it on all other times. even at half the cost, on the gameing, and mid range, its more cost effective to buy the better psu, the highend though, used a 750 watt Corsair, there should be a 550 or 600~ watt one that would be cheaper and better fit in line with the other psus tested.

    more to the point. we needs a toms chart for psus, right now we have a efficiantcy chart, but what we need is a build chart.

    one that takes the psus, and puts them in a standard pc enviorment, like the ones here, and measures the watts used.

    than gives us a baseline like this one is 100% than how much more the ones above use in %, than in numbers next to it, and than figuring the annual power cost for the extra watts they use, and find out which ones really the best for your builds, assuming a 4 year build cycle with a 5 year use, like i did above.

    i honestly think that could result in an interesting benchmark.
  • -1 Hide
    SteelCity1981 , September 7, 2011 9:35 AM
    iam2thecroweunfortunately that is not always the case, you could buy a resonably expensive Thermaltake TR2 RX series and end up with a piece of crap.


    Yes but in most cases if you buy something cheap the vast majority of the time it's going to be cheaply made so therefor it will break a lot faster then something you buy at a preimuim that's has quality. Your odds of getting a lemon Bently is a lot lower then buying a Dodge that's a lemon. of coure you pay a hell of a lot more for the Bently then your typical dodge but that's because you are paying for the high preimum of quality and craftsmenship that goes into it vs something that is made mostly by a machine.
  • 10 Hide
    MrHull , September 7, 2011 10:42 AM
    Great article, even an idiot like me could understand it.
    Would like to see more articles written like this.
    Well written, and well done !!!
  • 1 Hide
    DSpider , September 7, 2011 11:38 AM
    Rocking a no-name PSU here. I do realise that a slightly more expensive PSU makes more sense if it lasts 5+ years (or at least has the potential to, because you never know...) instead of some cheap crap that won't even last 2 years. But the circuitry design and components today aren't the same as 8 years ago. For instance all motherboards sold today have solid capacitors, even the cheap ones. Meaning they will last much more than their 8 year old equivalents.

    Beware of retailers that don't pass on full specs. Always check the manufacturer website for specs. Some retailers seem to forget to add complete descriptions for PSUs (and products in general too) which they have to order, but seem to add more info to the ones they have on stock. Probably to make them look better so they get rid of it faster. Living in Romania I already have "blacklisted" quite a few retailers from which I'll never EVER buy, based on this solely alone. It was actually very subtle, and it wasn't that they simply "forgot" either. As soon as I noticed this discrepancy I started to question their entire business model. Didn't even bother to tell them (didn't want to) because I'd rather have some other smart person catch on to their scheme instead of guiltying them into correcting it.
  • 8 Hide
    julius 85 , September 7, 2011 12:30 PM
    ryandsouzaLearnt the hard way... Was using the PSU bundled with my case. It was the typical cheap, no-brand PSU. The PC was constantly crashing/ freezing and I never suspected the PSU. Ended up damaging 2 HDDs... Had to RMA both.Now I got a CM PSU and no problems since!

    CM PSUs aren't that amazing either
  • 5 Hide
    cTs Corvette , September 7, 2011 12:39 PM
    Ever wonder who really makes that PSU? Here's a very simple tool that will let you find out:

    http://database.ul.com/cgi-bin/XYV/template/LISEXT/1FRAME/index.htm

    Look for the symbol on the PSU label that looks like a backward "R" next to a "U". Under that symbol, you will find the letter "E" followed by a 6-digit number. Put that in the UL Online Certification Directory on the line that says "UL File Number" and it will tell you who that file number belongs to. For example, you would find that some Silverstone PSU's are made by Silverstone, some are made by "Enhance Electronics Co. LTD." and some are made by FSP.
  • 0 Hide
    CaedenV , September 7, 2011 12:41 PM
    First 2 builds were power supplies that were bundled with the case (350W and 450W). After killing several mobo's and hard drives I finally forked over the money for a nice Thermaltake 480W power supply, back when Thermaltake was awesome :-). The difference was night and day between the day to day opperation of my computer. I had no idea that it would cause everything to run so much smoother.
    Fast forward another year sitting in a 100yr old dorm room with a power grid that was not meant to run the amount of draw that we were all pulling, and we were all loosing parts left and right. This was long before active power correction was normal, or even affordable. But I lost my video editing rig right in the middle of finals week, and it was entirely due to the power available (though not the power supply that lasted me several more years without problems when I moved out of the dorms).
    On my last build I bought a very nice 500W power supply that has all of the modern niceties of voltage regulation and power protection (as well as the power connectors that the old supply did not have), but now that I am looking at doing a new build next year I am not sure if it will be big enough. I think it will be fine at first, but I am going to do SLI down the line, and according to the math here I am going to need a peak of ~900W available, meaning I need a ~1000+W PSU... and that is going to hurt the wallet
  • 1 Hide
    julius 85 , September 7, 2011 12:50 PM
    Peak ~900W? You're going to use like 4 GTX570s?
Display more comments