Page 1:Third-Party Cooling And An Attractive Price?
Page 2:Take A Tour Of The PCS+ R9 290X
Page 3:Box Contents, Dimensions, And Weight
Page 4:Gaming Performance
Page 5:Power Draw: Test System And Methods
Page 6:Power Draw: Gaming, Web Browsing, And Idle
Page 7:Clock Rates, Temperature, And Sound Level
Page 8:Solid Performance And Pricing Come Together
Test System and Benchmarks
We ran four carefully selected benchmarks at the highest quality settings, then normalized and added the individual results, which yields a performance index for each card.
|System||Intel Core i7-4930K (Ivy Bridge-E), Overclocked to 4 GHz|
Asus Rampage IV Black Edition, X79 Express
32 GB Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR3-2133
Enermax TLC 240 Closed-Loop Liquid Cooler
1 x 512 GB Samsung 840 Pro
|Power Supply:||Corsair AX860i|
|Operating System:||Windows 8.1|
|Drivers:||AMD Catalyst 14.2 Beta|
Nvidia GeForce 334.89
|Benchmarks:||Metro Last Light|
Battlefield 4 (Single-Player)
Crysis 3 DX11
In order to achieve realistic and comparable results, we heat up the cards prior to benchmarking, subjecting them to a 3D load that takes their GPU temperatures up to a steady state. This creates a level playing field for factory-overclocked cards.
PowerColor's card delivers impressive results, placing third behind the higher-clocked MSI R9 290X Lightning and HIS R9 290X IceQ X². Differences between the cards are small though, and almost certainly not worth a $100 difference to enthusiasts better-served putting that money into a larger SSD or faster processor.