- Phenom vs. Athlon Core Scaling Compared
- Update: New Notebook CPU Charts
- Intel Power Consumption Then and Now
- AMD Phenom vs. Athlon Core Shootout
- Can Water push Yorkfield to 5 GHz?
- AMD: Survival and the Future
- Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770: UPDATE
- Phenom 9700, AMD's 1st Quad-Core CPU
- Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770: Paper Tiger?
- Overclocking: Dual- vs. Quad-Core CPUs
- AMD has once again taken the technological lead ???
- CPU Buyers' Guide (updated 10 May 2008)
- Why AMD Tri-Core is Already a Failure
- AMD does it again, R700 Delayed till 2009, Phenom 2Q 2008
- Whats the difference with ram and processors?
- E6600: Is my vcore safe for 24/7 usage? Advice Needed.
- Is liquid cooling really worth the money?
- System Cooling/Heating
- Whats a super locked XP Athlon chip ?
- advice on new cpu+ram please
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: processor, efficiency, compared
Topics: AMD/ATI
Syndication:
Performance Per Watt Normalized

Here is the normalized result, showing the improvement in performance per watt in percent.
Performance Vs. Power Consumption Diagram
I particularly like these power/performance diagrams, as they show the power requirements during the entire SYSmark 2007 Preview run at any given point of the benchmark, as well as the time it took to complete the benchmark. You can see clearly that the Phenom system does indeed require the most power while it is working (including the peaks), but it also completes the benchmark suite in one hour and 23 minutes. The dual core processors required one hour and 35 minutes, while the single core Sempron took one hour and 45 minutes to complete the workload. A processor running under full load for approximately 20 minutes will of course stress your electricity meter.
- Previous page Total Power Required For SYSmark 2007...
- Next page Conclusion
