All about Storage Solutions
 Latest Storage Solutions articles
All Storage Solutions articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : More Mindless Violence Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
action : Yoyo the Star Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
Ads

Sponsored links

Co-World Sharedisk Pro 400

Previous Next
2:00 AM - 04/10/2009 by Marcel Binder

Special Features

The ShareDisk Pro 400 not only distinguishes itself from the other NAS systems reviewed here by virtue of its numerous ports and connectors, but also through its use of Network Directed Attached Storage (NDAS) technology. That means it uses the so-called lean packet exchange (LPX) protocol to communicate with computer clients, rather than the more typical TCP/IP used for data transport in conventional NAS devices.

Thus, network device identification for this device comes from a device ID (usually printed on the back of such devices) rather than the more typical and arbitrarily assigned IP address. LPX confers the advantage of higher network data transfer rates than TCP/IP can deliver, thanks to its decreased overhead.

Another significant difference between NDAS and more conventional NAS devices is that the ShareDisk Pro 400 acts just like a normal internal hard disk (albeit across the network, if not directly attached to a single PC using eSATA or USB). This lets users format the ShareDisk 400 with whatever file system they might like, rather than the EXT3 file system normally used on most network-attached storage. Also, the ShareDisk Pro 400 can support file access using aliases or other special file handles, which NAS does not permit.

NDAS: Faster, But Also Potentially More Problematic

Use of the LPX protocol does entail some concessions, too. For one thing, any host computer that wishes to access the NDAS device must install an LPX protocol driver. This can sometimes lead to problems. Thus, for example, we could only achieve a working NDAS connection on one of our test machines that came equipped with both Realtek and Marvell network interfaces when we turned off the Realtek circuitry. As long as we left both interfaces up and running, our test machine would blue screen whenever it tried to load the "ndis.sys" driver. Except for this glitch, we had no problems with the Co-World ShareDisk Pro 400.

Construction and Form Factor

Currently available only in Europe, the Co-World ShareDisk Pro 400 goes for the equivalent of $1,250. For the money, it is a solid NDAS subsystem that includes four hot-swappable SATA drive bays, and features high-quality, well-designed construction throughout. The rear of this device features one USB 2.0, one eSATA, and an RJ-45 for GbE, an on-off switch, a voltage selector, and a standard three-prong power port. Thanks to the various connections and options it supports, users can take advantage of flexible settings and configurations and set installation regions separately on a per-device basis. 

Co-World also disclosed some future plans to us--namely that the ShareDisk Pro 400 is undergoing a makeover, so that a separate voltage selector won't be necessary, as its internal components will be able to sense and configure their own input requirements directly with the built-in power supply. Also, Co-World plans to add an RS-232 connector to the device to better enable external monitoring of this storage system.

Features and Functions

The front panel of the device includes an LCD display that provides status information about its current status, RAID configuration, temperature, and fan speed. Four buttons beneath that display control selection and configuration of a RAID setup for the ShareDisk Pro 400. Menu navigation is simple and straightforward and configuration setup uncomplicated. RAID 0, 10, 5, and 5+Spare modes are supported.

Power Consumption

A ShareDisk Pro 400 consumes about 43 W under normal usage when equipped with four hard disks. During a RAID rebuild, power consumption climbs to around 53 W.

Talkback
chaugh 04/10/2009 1:59 PM
Hide
--2+

TYPO!!!

and you see that heritage in the TS-590 Pro.

What's a TS-590?

cknobman 04/10/2009 2:45 PM
Hide
-2+

If you want something simple to share data at home I cant figure out why anyone would buy a cheap NAS that gives less than 15 mbps or something outrageous costing over $700. Why not build your own using low power cpu that would perform much better than the cheap NAS devices and still come in hundreds of dollars less than the overpriced NAS devices?

dje007 04/10/2009 2:55 PM
Hide
-0+

I have a Qnap TS-639 and love it

yourhighness 04/10/2009 5:39 PM
Hide
-0+

cknobman :
If you want something simple to share data at home I cant figure out why anyone would buy a cheap NAS that gives less than 15 mbps or something outrageous costing over $700. Why not build your own using low power cpu that would perform much better than the cheap NAS devices and still come in hundreds of dollars less than the overpriced NAS devices?



THIS

yourhighness 04/10/2009 5:43 PM
Hide
-0+

More on this Topic....?

Hitting the link for the last page just gives me a blank pop-up box....

Using Chrome.

yourhighness 04/10/2009 5:44 PM
Hide
-0+

yourhighness :
More on this Topic....?Hitting the link for the last page just gives me a blank pop-up box....Using Chrome.


Grabbing the link from the drop down works fine, but from the conclusion page going to the next page is broken.

thej 04/10/2009 5:51 PM
Hide
-0+

yourhighness :
More on this Topic....?Hitting the link for the last page just gives me a blank pop-up box....Using Chrome.



That's all it is. More ads so they can pay the bills.

thej 04/10/2009 5:52 PM
Hide
-0+

Nevermind, read the question wrong. Need edit button.

Anonymous 04/10/2009 6:59 PM
Hide
--1+

If you want to build your own rock-solid RAID NAS, and do so with cheap old hardware, check out my guide on building a Linux RAID-5 NAS. I wrote this guide so even someone who has never worked with Linux before can get it up and running, and maintain it, very easily! Hope this helps someone out there!
Go to my site at: http://cobraftp.serveftp.com and click on Linux.. then at the top is the PDF, which is labeled "Linux RAID-5 How-to Guide"

Anonymous 04/10/2009 9:02 PM
Hide
-0+

how did you exclude the new Readynas NVX? seems kinda silly without that leader in both functionality and performance involved

midnightgun 04/11/2009 7:09 AM
Hide
-0+

I own a Synology CS-407e. Simple and just works. Leave it on all the time and just don't worry about it. Love it.

snarfies 04/13/2009 4:35 PM
Hide
-0+

I've said it before and I'll say it again - I don't know what this site's obsession is with NAS devices, but the NS3200N is the first NAS ever reviewed here that isn't an overpriced and underperforming piece of garbage! Shame I didn't know about it sooner - I just dropped $300 on a Mini-ITX Atom 330 MB and case to make my own NAS, and I haven't even bought the two drives for my RAID1 yet. I hope I'll get better results...

wyomingKnott 04/13/2009 4:42 PM
Hide
-1+

Your opion is sought: Why not buy an HP MediaSmart system? It costs less than the Qnap device and seems to be similarly capable?

voodooaddict 04/13/2009 10:00 PM
Hide
-0+

WyomingKnott :
Your opion is sought: Why not buy an HP MediaSmart system? It costs less than the Qnap device and seems to be similarly capable?



I'm wondering the same thing. Why wasn't one of the MS Home Server units included. None of these units are putting out blazing transfer rates.

The only thing I can figure is that these NAS units could be used for business as well as home use. Where the MS Home server is really just for home use.

I don't know about anyone else here, but I wouldn't use any of these devices for critical live biz data. Setup as near-line backup devices, sure. But not live data.

Anonymous 04/14/2009 3:08 AM
Hide
-0+

Actually.. this review is a bit short.. not a comparison for all nas boxes.. just a chumped up silly list of nas boxes that he writer found at the time. rather pathetic actually.
just to spin a spanner.. try freenas.. www.freenas.com

Anonymous 04/16/2009 7:54 PM
Hide
-0+

Drobo anyone?

gm0n3y 04/24/2009 12:37 PM
Hide
-0+

Anonymous :
Drobo anyone?



I was thinking the same thing.

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links

Related articles

  • Network Storage: Three NAS Units Rounded Up

    Network storage is great for centralizing data on a home or small business network. The real question is: do you build your own NAS or buy one that's already primed for action? We round up three ready-made units to see if any of them suit our fancy.

  • Promise NS4300N: NAS For Small Offices

    Promise is known for its RAID controllers, but how the company will fare long-term on the NAS market remains to be seen. We took a closer look at the first of its network storage offerings, the NS4300N

  • Future Promise for Graphics: PCI Express

    PCI Express is coming. We try to give you a forecast of how it will affect graphic cards and systems. We also try to find out if we really need the increased bandwidth of 4 GB per second that PCI Express x16 offers at this time.