|
Core 2 Quad Q6600 Processor |
Compare the top 5 lowest prices by hovering your mouse over the product names on the left |
|
|
Core 2 Q9550 Quad Core Processor | ||
|
Core 2 Duo E8400 Dual Core Processor | ||
|
Core 2 Duo E8500 Dual Core Processor | ||
|
Phenom 9850 Quad Core Processor |
- AMD's 4x4 Platform & Athlon 64 FX-70 - Brute Force Quad Cores
- Kentsfield Released: Core 2 Quad Core Ready to Ravage the High-End
- Intel Xeon and AMD Opteron Battle Head to Head
- Cheap Thrills: Core 2 Duo E6400 Overclocked to 3.33 GHz
- IDF Fall 2006: From Core 2 Quadro to 80 Cores
- Green Machine: AMD Dual-Core Platform at 54W
- Intel's Core 2 Quadro Kentsfield: Four Cores on a Rampage
- AMD's Dual Core Laptops Have Arrived: Introducing the Turion 64 X2
- Tom's Summer CPU Charts Assault
- THG Tuning Test: Core 2 Extreme vs. Athlon 64 FX-62
Conclusion
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: quad, core, xeon, clovertown, rolls, into, dp, servers
Syndication:
Conclusion
Some people may say the benefits of Intel's quad-core Clovertown aren't as clear as expected, as there are several benchmarks where it cannot outperform the dual-core Xeon 5200 Woodcrest. However, the results do not necessarily mean others might find our benchmarks impressive enough to justify purchasing a quad-core server or workstation today.
Intel did a great job of exploiting existing technology to offer a more powerful product. The energy requirements of the new quad cores certainly are somewhat higher under load, but the additional power drawn in idle mode is small and thus very much acceptable. Customers of the Xeon 5300 series will receive two physical dual-core chips in a single-processor package, 2x 4 MB L2 cache and the clearly best Xeon server/workstation processor product available today.
So, if you had to buy dual-processor servers/workstations now, should you get quad-core machines? Our answer to this question is yes if you will experience a benefit for your business by shortening processing times for your demanding workloads. You will need the latest software to fully exploit thread optimizations, and you'll have to be ready to spend the extra money for quad-core power supplies. You also can't be stingy when it comes to selecting components.
For everyone else we strongly recommend staying the course with dual-core machines for the time being for the following reasons:
- While workstation workloads vary a lot, typical server systems run at a maximum average system load of 20-30% most of the day. Quad-core processors would not have any measurable impact at this point.
- Almost all currently available Xeon systems that are based on the 5000 chipset are easily upgradeable with a quad core processor. You could consider a processor upgrade later, and you might even get faster processor versions for less money.
- AMD is working on its own quad-core offering, which is expected to hit the market in spring next year. With dedicated L2 caches per core and a unified L3 cache, it might easily become the more powerful product.
Related Articles:
Kentsfield Released: Core 2 Quad Core Ready to Ravage the High-End
IDF Spring 2006: Will Intel's Core Architecture Close the Technology Gap?
Join our discussion on this topic
- Previous page Synthetic, Continued
