ATI Radeon HD 5870: DirectX 11, Eyefinity, And Serious Speed

Benchmark Results: H.A.W.X.

This was one of ATI’s banner DirectX 10.1 titles, and we’ve thus tested our ATI contenders with DirectX 10.1 enabled. But a single Radeon HD 5870 doesn’t quite exhibit the same exuberance we’ve seen in games like Far Cry 2 here. Instead, a single card barely outperforms Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 285 and is, in fact, beaten pretty badly by the Radeon HD 4870 X2 and GeForce GTX 295.

Although SLI does great things for the performance of two GeForce GTX 285s, CrossFire helps the 5870s even more, nearly doubling frame rates at each tested resolution. At the end of the day, a single Radeon HD 5870 doesn’t look very impressive here, but a pair of the cards serves up uncontested performance all the way through 2560x1600.

Improvements to anti-aliasing shine through with 8x turned on, and although a single Radeon HD 5870 doesn’t impress at 1680x1050 or 1920x1200, the jump to 2560x1600 sees every other card fall to below-playable levels, while the 5870 maintains more than 40 frames per second—not entirely bad in a flight simulator like this one.

Of course, the real magic happens when you add a second 5870 and see frame rates jump to 75.

Note the GeForce GTX 295’s missing score at 2560x1600—another instance where 896MB of GDDR3 memory per on-board GPU just isn’t enough to play such a demanding setting. It takes a graphics card with at least 1GB to make such a high resolution and anti-aliasing setting available, which is something the GeForce GTX 295 just can’t muster.

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
214 comments
    Your comment
    Top Comments
  • hispeed120
    I'm. So. Excited.
    26
  • cangelini
    viper666why didn't they thest it against a GTX 295 rather than 280??? its far superior...


    Ran it against a GTX 295 and a 285 and 285s in SLI :)
    23
  • megamanx00
    O M F G!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Just wish the darn thing wasn't so big, but man, what a card! Now I'm thinking about a bigger case :D
    22
  • Other Comments
  • hispeed120
    I'm. So. Excited.
    26
  • Anonymous
    Can't wait
    9
  • crosko42
    So it looks like 1 is enough for me.. Dont plan on getting a 30 inch monitor any time soon.
    21
  • jezza333
    Looks like the NDA lifted at 11:00PM, as there's a load of reviews now just out. Once again it shows that AMD can produce a seriously killer card...

    Crysis 2 on an x2 of this is exactly what I'm waiting for.
    20
  • woostar88
    This is incredible at the price point.
    8
  • LORD_ORION
    Err... I thought I was going to see more for the price. Regardless, I think ATI missed the mark here. I am interested in playing games on my HDTV since me and my monitor don't care about these higher resolutions. Fail cakes... Nivida is undoubtedly going to rape ATI in performance with the 300 series. This is good news for mainstream prices however.... you can ptobably upgrade to a current DX10 board soon for a very good price, and then buy a 5850 for $100 in a year from now. Result? Don't but a 5000 series card yet until the price comes down? Heh, I bet the cards will be $100 less in December if the 300 series launches.

    This is not to say I am an Nvidia fan, just undoubtedly you would do well for yourself to hold off for a bit if you want to buy a 5000 series... as the price will come down for a good price/performance ratio soon enough.
    -41
  • tipmen
    wait, wait, before I look can it play cry... HOLY SHIT?!
    20
  • viper666
    why didn't they thest it against a GTX 295 rather than 280??? its far superior...
    -35
  • cangelini
    viper666why didn't they thest it against a GTX 295 rather than 280??? its far superior...


    Ran it against a GTX 295 and a 285 and 285s in SLI :)
    23
  • Annisman
    I refuse to buy until the 2GB versions come out, not to mention newegg letting you buy more than 1 at a time, paper launch ftl.
    2
  • jasperjones
    Thanks for the timely review. I have to say though, some of the technical details are beyond me. It'd be useful if you explained terms such as "VLIW architecture" or "tessellation engine"
    15
  • viper666
    oh my bad... didn't see the rest of the pages :)
    -14
  • megamanx00
    O M F G!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Just wish the darn thing wasn't so big, but man, what a card! Now I'm thinking about a bigger case :D
    22
  • Annisman
    Oops, who am I kidding ? I just ordered 2 5870's. One Sapphire, and one HIS, seeing as how they limit you to one per customer.
    17
  • falchard
    I think most of this review has to do with how many games are optimized for nVidia. The Crytek Engine 2.0 and Source Engine are well known for heavily favoring nVidia architecture yet compose the bulk of the benchmarks. I think the fact ATI can do best in these engines when they have a detect ATI instant nerf its performance speaks measures for the actual card.
    18
  • charlesxuma
    I WANT MY MOOOMMYYYYYY !!!!!!!
    -10
  • tipmen
    Another thing is that the 5800x2 isn't out yet, now think of two of those bad boys in Crossfire.
    14
  • blackbyron
    Not bad for Crysis benchmark. I really want 5870 for my christmas present, but damn I also need to buy a new PSU.
    6
  • blackbyron
    In addition, I am impressed that the 5870 has a better power consumption and better gaming performance compare to DX10 cards. If the card is affordable I'd definite buy one.
    12
  • cangelini
    jasperjonesThanks for the timely review. I have to say though, some of the technical details are beyond me. It'd be useful if you explained terms such as "VLIW architecture" or "tessellation engine"


    Jasper,
    TBH, the architectural details are secondary to how the card performs. However, if you'd like a better idea of what tessellation can do for you, check out the picture of the Alien on page six!
    3