AMD Radeon HD 7770 And 7750 Review: Familiar Speed, Less Power

Flexible Form Factors And Tessellation Performance

By virtue of its dual-slot cooler, 8.5” PCB, and auxiliary power requirement, the Radeon HD 7770 qualifies as a gaming card, despite its mid-range target audience. Most ATX-based HTPC enclosures will accommodate it, but it’s certainly on the larger side for that application.

The Radeon HD 7750, however, is far more flexible. As you’ll see in the benchmarks, it’s generally not as fast as a Radeon HD 5770. But I don’t do a ton of gaming on my HTPC. Rather, I want that machine to be fast enough, quiet, and cool to the point where I don’t need my cabinet’s door open for air circulation. On paper, the 7750 should be a shoo-in.

I pulled the Radeon HD 5770 out of my existing HTPC, where it has lived for more than two years, and replaced it with the new single-slot board. Pressed for time, I didn’t take before and after power, thermal, or acoustic measurements. But from a seat on the couch, the noise during movie playback was similar, while cabinet heat was down very significantly.

As with the Radeon HD 7950, I tested to be sure the card’s protected audio path is recognized, and PowerDVD gave no protest to bitstreaming Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio to my receiver.

I did run into a bit of strange behavior while testing hardware-accelerated decode support. Using PowerDVD 10 and 12, toggling the feature on and off had no impact on performance, good, bad, or otherwise. With my Phenom II X4 905e-based PC running at 2.5 GHz, CPU utilization floated between 15 and 20 percent. Enabling Cool’n’Quiet kept the machine at 800 MHz, which pushed utilization up above 30%. Our minds were put at ease when we installed Arcsoft's Total Media Theater and easily switched between hardware acceleration on and off, returning utilization numbers around 8% with UVD 3 enabled and averaging 37% using software decoding.

Also, still noticeably missing is AMD’s fixed-function, hardware-accelerated encode support, enabled through the Video Codec Engine. This feature was announced alongside the Radeon HD 7970. It’s present in the Radeon HD 7950, and it carries over to Cape Verde, too. According to AMD, there are already software vendors with VCE support in their transcode-oriented applications. But it says functionality isn’t ready for production, and is turned off at the driver level. Presumably, a future update will flip a switch and expose the feature.

Until then, shader-based encoding acceleration should be working fine. Unfortunately, we still haven’t seen that in practice on a 7000-series card, either. Worse, it now seems broken on the Radeon HD 6000-series cards, too. The above shot shows the check-box greyed out.

Tessellation: Who Needs A PolyMorph Engine, Anyway?

Nvidia’s Fermi architecture put a big emphasis on geometry performance. Each of the design’s Shader Multiprocessors got its own PolyMorph Engine, in fact, to help parallelize the handling of vertices. At the time, AMD’s own geometry throughput lagged behind, and Nvidia pointed to applications like HAWX 2 as evidence of its competitor’s shortcoming in the coming wave of tessellation-enabled DirectX 11 titles.

Well, we know how that turned out. Successively, in the Barts-based Radeon HD 6800- and Cayman-based Radeon HD 6900-series line-ups, AMD made improvements to its geometry engine (and then engines, plural) to the point where it retained the same relative performance with heavy tessellation enabled in tests like HAWX 2 and Unigine’s engine benchmark. Then, we saw the Radeon HD 7900-series deliver percentages that exceeded what Nvidia could achieve. Even though the GeForce cards cranked out higher frame rates, turning on tessellation was “cheaper” on a Radeon HD 7970 or 7950.

The same story holds true here. In absolute terms, the Radeon cards end up at the bottom of the stack—and it’s entirely possible that Nvidia’s cozy relationship with Ubisoft during development plays a role in affecting the raw performance numbers. But as a percentage of frame rate with tessellation turned off, enabling the DirectX 11-oriented feature has less of an impact on the Radeon HD 7770 and 7750.

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
158 comments
    Your comment
    Top Comments
  • hardcore_gamer
    I hope the price of 7770 comes down to $130. That is where this card belongs.
    42
  • Derbixrace
    the 7750 will be a GREAT card compared to the 6670 for those who have a shitty 300w PSU and wants a nice GPU.
    29
  • mattmock
    stm1185These prices are terrible, even compared to the current competition and not the inevitable huge price drop to compete with Nvidia's next gen. 7770 giving less then GTX460 performance at $160, when in what 2-3 months Nvidia will probably be giving that performance level for under $99. 7770 is crap.

    Amd may be taking advantage of their unopposed release of the 7000 series to sell their cards at high margins. They may just be waiting for the new Nvidia cards to come out before they drop prices.
    23
  • Other Comments
  • Derbixrace
    the 7750 will be a GREAT card compared to the 6670 for those who have a shitty 300w PSU and wants a nice GPU.
    29
  • hardcore_gamer
    I hope the price of 7770 comes down to $130. That is where this card belongs.
    42
  • phamhlam
    If the 7770 is the same price as the 6850. I think we have the best value card right here. The 6850 was a great budget card but this card will change that.
    -17
  • dragonsqrrl
    "Although other cards beat it in encryption and decryption performance, the Radeon HD 7750 easily secures a second-place finish in the SHA256 hashing test."

    I think you mean AES256.
    -9
  • jprahman
    The fight shaping up between all these new AMD cards and Kepler is looking to be a good one. Time to just sit back with some popcorn and enjoy the show... while planning a new build for when the price war breaks out.
    19
  • esrever
    Seems ok, New stuff ussually cost more. The 6770 being more expensive than the 5770, the 6870 being more expensive than the 5850 ect.

    I'd expect prices to go down once supply goes up and demand goes down.
    3
  • confish21
    What a sad release. I'm not even excited for Pitcairn now! I foresee the $170 6870 to hold its own.
    0
  • Anonymous
    This is ridiculous. Man this sucks, i've been waiting for the 7770 since early last year, and this crap is what they release?

    What_were_they_thinking?
    1
  • wicketr
    Well....here's hoping for a good 7850/7870 release on March 6th. Not much here worth spending money on IMO.
    12
  • buzznut
    This is unfortunate, considering the naming scheme. The 4770, 5770, and 6770 were/are all good budget cards that performed above where they were priced. Bang for buck has always been the draw here, but that 7770 is overpriced. Hopefully AMD will see this fumble; I agree at $120-130 this card makes a lot more sense.

    I'd actually like to see the HD 7750 at a lower price too, as we know these prices will drop over time but I still think this is slightly high for launch.
    20
  • fistoffoo
    I am literally having a Nerdgasim LOL.
    -11
  • mattmock
    In the monthly best Graphics cards you mention that AMD is dominating. I wonder why though. Are Nvidia's cards capable of maintaining a price premium because consumers are willing to pay a little more to use Nvidia drivers and extras like PhysX and 3d vision? Or possibly are their cards more expensive to manufacture and so Nvidia must raise prices to maintain margins and simply suffer reduced sales at those prices. Anyone know?
    -8
  • gti88
    With price tags lake these, 7770 and 7750 could have big radiators for passive cooling.
    -7
  • stm1185
    These prices are terrible, even compared to the current competition and not the inevitable huge price drop to compete with Nvidia's next gen. 7770 giving less then GTX460 performance at $160, when in what 2-3 months Nvidia will probably be giving that performance level for under $99.

    7770 is crap.
    -10
  • mattmock
    stm1185These prices are terrible, even compared to the current competition and not the inevitable huge price drop to compete with Nvidia's next gen. 7770 giving less then GTX460 performance at $160, when in what 2-3 months Nvidia will probably be giving that performance level for under $99. 7770 is crap.

    Amd may be taking advantage of their unopposed release of the 7000 series to sell their cards at high margins. They may just be waiting for the new Nvidia cards to come out before they drop prices.
    23
  • ztr
    Damn it! >_<

    Couldnt the 7750 release before I bought my 5670? >_>
    -5
  • scallywanker
    I was hoping the 7770 would provide a little more umph. I'm running a 460GTX-SLI setup, and hoped that ATI... er AMD's mid-range bracket in Crossfire would provide a significant boost, worthy of an upgrade. With the 460 more than hanging in there at stock speeds, I can't see a dual-card upgrade in the future, unless Kepler just absolutely blows this up at these price points. Even the 7950 and 7970 are a hard sell with limited availability and price-gouging.

    AMD is like the Chicago Cubs. Even non-fans want them to succeed, but they can never seem to get their act together.
    10
  • a4mula
    MattMockAmd may be taking advantage of their unopposed release of the 7000 series to sell their cards at high margins. They may just be waiting for the new Nvidia cards to come out before they drop prices.


    I agree somewhat, but I don't think it's the enthusiast crowd they're targeting here. It's the OEM crapfest that pushes the latest trash onto unknowing consumers while slapping a gaming pc title on their box.

    AMD had an edge with the Cayman because its performance was unopposed in the single gpu realm. With these cards that's nowhere close to the truth. In the past you could at least expect to get new DX support newer shading support or anything that would give the current model a unique edge over it's predecessor. I'm just not seeing that with this release. Then to top it off AMD is continuing the trend they started with the 7970 of an over-inflated launch price. While that might have flown with the cards that were untouchable, it's not going to fly here when you can spend the same money for more peformance, period.

    I feel bad for pre-built pc buyers that are unaware of things like this, such a ripoff.
    9
  • scallywanker
    scallywankerAMD's mid-range bracket


    Confused by the launch order and prices, I mistook this for their mid-range, and not their budget range. It's better, but not by much.
    5
  • Anonymous
    AMD GCN HD7700 Performance good,quite energy saving
    -4