Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Results: Crysis 3 At 1920x1080 And 2560x1440

Radeon R9 290X Review: AMD's Back In Ultra-High-End Gaming
By , Igor Wallossek

As with BioShock, I wanted to maintain the same test setting in Crysis 3 across our three resolutions for comparison purposes. Interestingly enough, the numbers we see from Radeon R9 280X match up with what we saw in AMD Radeon R9 280X, R9 270X, And R7 260X: Old GPUs, New Names, even using a newer driver. However, more powerful graphics hardware appears to push us into a platform bottleneck at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440. The easiest way around this would be using a more taxing detail preset (though as you’ll see in the Ultra HD tests, High is really the ceiling for single-GPU gaming at 3840x2160).

At 1920x1080, all of the cards fall into a narrow range. Pushing to 2560x1440 spread it out a bit. But it won’t be until we reach 3840x2160 that we see the bars better-differentiated.


What about all of those spikes and dips? Crysis 3 is the one game in our suite that requires manual input to run through a preset path. Enemies take different paths and terrain gets affected by explosions. We typically run this test multiple times when it looks like something might affect the outcome noticeably, but the more severe discrepancies at 1920x1080 seem to confirm that the platform is playing more of a role in the frame rates than our powerful graphics cards.

Less consistent frame delivery affects the dual-card solutions most. AMD’s Radeon HD 7990 sees the highest average variance, though Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 690 gets hit by more severe worst-case results.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 500 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 99 Hide
    BigMack70 , October 23, 2013 10:04 PM
    Thank goodness AMD had some sense with the pricing. Finally, at long last, Nvidia can stop raping consumers' wallets due to lack of competition.

    This is win-win-win for everyone (except maybe Nvidia).

    Hope we never have to deal with a $1000 single GPU fiasco again. Good riddance.
  • 79 Hide
    beta212 , October 23, 2013 9:09 PM
    That's incredible. Especially at high res, I wonder how they do it. But the low price alone is enough to blow the competition away. Seriously think about it, it's around half the price for higher performance!
    - AMD: We're not aiming for the ultra high end.
    I think Nvidia just got trolled.
  • 60 Hide
    anxiousinfusion , October 23, 2013 9:37 PM
    Wait the 290 X... X? is going to be $550?! Forgive me, padre for I have sinned.
Other Comments
  • 79 Hide
    beta212 , October 23, 2013 9:09 PM
    That's incredible. Especially at high res, I wonder how they do it. But the low price alone is enough to blow the competition away. Seriously think about it, it's around half the price for higher performance!
    - AMD: We're not aiming for the ultra high end.
    I think Nvidia just got trolled.
  • 29 Hide
    slomo4sho , October 23, 2013 9:12 PM
    Great price point. This card has already broken world records just a few hours after release!


  • 25 Hide
    aznguy0028 , October 23, 2013 9:19 PM
    I was thinking about hopping on the 7970ghz when it's on sale, but after seeing this, it's time to break apart the piggy bank for the 290x, what value!
  • 33 Hide
    Benthon , October 23, 2013 9:21 PM
    Like the conclusion said, you just can't argue about aesthetics and thermals at this price point/performance. Well done AMD, lets see team green's response! Go consumer!
  • 21 Hide
    tuklap , October 23, 2013 9:25 PM
    This is awesome for us ^_^
  • 23 Hide
    Shankovich , October 23, 2013 9:27 PM
    Wow, and it's pegged at 73% too. Even if nVidia's "780ti" beats the 290X, it probably won't beat a 290X running at full power. And if mantle does make some big performance boosts, nVidia is going to be in a really tight spot. Looking forward to what they'll do. In the mean time, loving this competition! We all win in the end.
  • 13 Hide
    julianbautista87 , October 23, 2013 9:31 PM
    daaaaayyyyyuuuummmm
  • 60 Hide
    anxiousinfusion , October 23, 2013 9:37 PM
    Wait the 290 X... X? is going to be $550?! Forgive me, padre for I have sinned.
  • 21 Hide
    Darkerson , October 23, 2013 9:40 PM
    Good job, AMD!
  • 21 Hide
    jkhoward , October 23, 2013 9:40 PM
    I just purchased this card from Newegg.
  • 15 Hide
    CaptainTom , October 23, 2013 9:41 PM
    Wow AMD. GG! You exceeded every possible expectation! Have fun with your GTX 780 Ti Fanboys!!!!!
  • 19 Hide
    ilysaml , October 23, 2013 9:42 PM
    Time to Upgrade my HD 6950 to 290X, and my 1080P to 2500x Monitor.
  • 37 Hide
    lt_dan_zsu , October 23, 2013 9:44 PM
    I've never been more blown away by a hardware review. Never have I seen a gpu beat another gpu at just over half the cost.
  • 11 Hide
    DarkForce_256 , October 23, 2013 9:45 PM
    So what's the deal with the 290?
  • 9 Hide
    shin0bi272 , October 23, 2013 9:51 PM
    it always tickles the hell out of me when an amd card ties or about ties an nvidia card in one game then in an nvidia physx game the amd kicks the crap out of the nvidia card... Of course if you know why that happens in metro you know its more of a fault of the coders not physx but its still funny.
  • 10 Hide
    jimmysmitty , October 23, 2013 9:58 PM
    $550 is not bad for the fact that it beats the 780 easily and even pressures the Titan.

    Most of the higher resolution gaming wins come from the larger memory bandwidth and of course more vs the 780.

    That's a good sign. Maybe NVidia will drop prices and push this to $400-$450 and I will pick one up when there is a Vapor-X version of course,
  • 2 Hide
    markbro89 , October 23, 2013 9:59 PM
    Where to buy?! Newegg still says coming soon D:
  • -7 Hide
    DarkForce_256 , October 23, 2013 10:03 PM
    So what's the deal with the 290?
  • 99 Hide
    BigMack70 , October 23, 2013 10:04 PM
    Thank goodness AMD had some sense with the pricing. Finally, at long last, Nvidia can stop raping consumers' wallets due to lack of competition.

    This is win-win-win for everyone (except maybe Nvidia).

    Hope we never have to deal with a $1000 single GPU fiasco again. Good riddance.
Display more comments