The Rampage II Gene leads 3DMark, but its advantage here is tiny.


The most impressive lead for Asus’ Rampage II Gene might be in PCMark, but it’s also DFI’s biggest downfall.


Slight advantage in clock control are often revealed in Sandra’s CPU tests, but the difference seen above is marginal.

The full-sized ATX motherboard leads Sandra’s Memory Bandwidth benchmark, but again by a trivial amount.
Previous
Next
Ask a Category Expert
Although this review let me have a little more respect for the board I'm still asus and gigabyte all the way.
Good point, and I agree, that the hardest thing for the market is for those who have idealisms that the atx board with the most slots are best, have to admit that this not the case, that they don’t need and wont likely use them. It’s about time technology moved on and we start shrinking the components. We've come a long way from house sized computers but seems to have got stuck with fridge-sized atx, time to change that and join the 21st century!
Really, the reason the Rampage II Gene wasn't considered for the $2500 PC is that it didn't show up under a Newegg category search (LGA-1366, Micro ATX) and Newegg didn't fix that until this week. It's a good board, and if you need a weird cooler style, supports the more popular LGA-775 coolers.
but im missing the MSI X58M (160€ best prive vs 198€ asus and 190 dfi) here, theres a great review at anandtech. the board really rocks and has only a few weak points (fan control and s3 wake up problem if overclocked). i think ppl would be glad if the msi could be added to this comparison.
best regards,
roman
P eople go for a full atx build simply because they can (
Personally, I'd probably give up a tiny bit of performance for the more noteworthy reduction in power used by DFI; I like the cooler flexibility of the Asus though. It would be a tough call.
The article was put together a month ago, written two weeks ago, and waited in queue while other articles that had time restrictions went up first. That unfortunately left MSI out of contention, since its Micro ATX motherboard was more recently released.
I don't know why anyone thinks Asus's Rampage II Gene is better than DFI Lanparty Jr.
A mATX shouldn't drain as much power as full ATX. Asus's draining more power on idle is a huge negative. I've also always assumed that mATX will not match full ATX in performance. DFI's 14.44% more overall efficiency with 2.26% less performance vs. Asus's 2% more overall efficiency with 0.46% better performance, DFI wins this hands down.
Sure, if you're out there to get a full ATX board, you might as well get the mATX Asus Rampage II Gene. But if you're out to get a mATX board, which is what this comparison is for, DFI Lanparty Jr is way better.
DFI is the clear winner in this category.
I'd like to see micro-ATX get more popular, and there's really no reason why it should not be. There's no reason at all for lower performance. None.
so true, but i havent seen any bad usb performances on x58 boards yet.
http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3568
http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3568
Read the 10th post in this thread.