Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Breaking Boundaries

Overclocking: Asus Rampage IV Extreme Versus EVGA X79 FTW
By
BIOS Frequency and Voltage settings (for overclocking)
 Asus Rampage IV ExtremeEVGA X79 FTW 151-SE-E777-KR
Base Clock80-300 MHz (0.1 MHz)85-287.5 MHz (1 MHz)
CPU Multiplier12x to 57x (1x)0x to 60x (1x)
DRAM Data Rates800-2666 (266.6 MHz)1067-2400 (266.6 MHz)
CPU Vcore0.80-2.10 V (5 mV)0.90-1.99 V (1 mV)
CPU VCCSA0.80-1.70 V (5 mV)0.90-1.99 V (1 mV)
VTT Voltage1.05-1.70 V (6.25 mV)0.90-1.55 V (1 mV)
X79 PCH Voltage0.80-1.60 V (6.25 mV)0.71-2.59 V (40 mV)
DRAM Voltage1.20-2.1 V (5 mV)0.90-1.99 V (1 mV)
CAS Latency3-15 Cycles3-15 Cycles
tRCD4-15 Cycles3-15 Cycles
tRP4-15 Cycles3-15 Cycles
tRAS4-40 Cycles9-63 Cycles


While we attempted to use identical base clocks for our overclocking benchmarks, those weren’t necessarily the absolute overclocking limits of this processor. We found that by adding just a few hundred kilohertz to the base clock, the Rampage IV Extreme was capable of pushing an extra 67 MHz behind its highest 100 MHz BCLK result.

EVGA gained nothing, tolerating not even the tiniest increase beyond the 4.67 GHz previously found in our 133.3 MHz base clock attempts. The same stability limit could be reached at 101.5 MHz base clock by using a 46x multiplier.

Our processor doesn’t work well at the chipset's 1.66x strap, with Asus’ 153 MHz max representing an underclock of some components. Anything less than 153 MHz was too much of an underclock for those components (likely the PCIe and/or SATA controllers), and the X79 FTW couldn’t successfully fit the processor within the narrow frequency range that allowed this strap.

Experienced hands are required to reach DDR3-2133 on the X79 FTW, since its default timings weren’t stable using XMP values. We couldn’t use its 21.33x multiplier anyway, and this overclock required both manual timing configuration and a 133 MHz base clock.

React To This Article