Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

The Benchmark System

Asus' ROG Ares II: Four Dual-GPU Graphics Cards, Compared
By

We’re testing with our 2012 VGA benchmark system. The driver we're using was the "miracle" update that catapulted AMD's performance out in front of what Nvidia could do with its GK104. As a result, we can draw comparisons between the dual-Tahiti boards and Nvidia's GeForce GTX 690 without worrying about software-based misrepresentations. Overall, the data should look pretty similar using today's beta drivers, at least in the games we're benchmarking.

Benchmark System
CPU
Intel Core i7-2600K (Sandy Bridge), 32 nm, 4C/8T, 8 MB Shared L3 Cache, Hyper-Threading Enabled, Overclocked to 4.5 GHz
Motherboard
Gigabyte Z68X-UD7-B3, Intel Z68 Express, BIOS F10
Memory
4 x 4 GB Kingston HyperX DDR3-1600
CPU Cooler
Cooler Master TPC 800 with Noiseblocker eLoop B12-PS (PWM)
System Drive
Kingston V200+ 480 GB
Power Supply
Corsair AX1200i Digital ATX Power Supply, 1200 W, 80 PLUS Platinum
Operating System Windows 7 x64 Ultimate
Drivers
Catalyst 12.11 (Beta) and Catalyst 12.9        
GeForce 306.97 WHQL
Ambient Temperature
22 °C (held constant)
Benchmark Case
NZXT Phantom 820


It’ll be interesting to see how these enormous cards fare in a closed case. It’s not easy to exhaust out 500 or more watts of heat.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 63 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 3 Hide
    acasel , April 2, 2013 10:58 PM
    nice video card.

    hope it doesnt cost a kidney :) 
  • 2 Hide
    Ceee9 , April 2, 2013 11:01 PM
    last picture on the last page seem..., i think it oversize
  • 0 Hide
    UltimateDeep , April 2, 2013 11:13 PM
    I think you can get 2 690s or least 3 680s for the price of an ARES 2. The benchmarkers didn't evaluate Performance per watt, or Performance per dollar and the flipping size and length of each card which is the reason why I still stand by the GTX 690 in this article... For all these cards, all of that personally needs to be taken into consideration.

    I've nothing against the Dual 7970s but just want to let consumers be aware of the pros and cons especially the cards are not for the meek of wallet.
  • 6 Hide
    killerchickens , April 2, 2013 11:17 PM
    So about that FCAT ........... sigh
  • 2 Hide
    slomo4sho , April 3, 2013 1:48 AM
    Wonder if Asus will re-release this card into the US market as the 7990.
  • 1 Hide
    ASHISH65 , April 3, 2013 2:26 AM
    WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • -9 Hide
    dkcomputer , April 3, 2013 2:29 AM
    Classic statement whenever you talk about AMD - "If only the software were better" or "When the software catches up" - how about "If only this component would be relevant when the software its made for exists"
  • -7 Hide
    PadaV4 , April 3, 2013 2:59 AM
    So is the fps for radeon dual cards already divided by 2 or must the reader do it by himself?
  • 3 Hide
    ShadyHamster , April 3, 2013 3:30 AM
    Quote:
    You can't buy it anymore, but we got our hands on one and are adding it to our database of performance data.


    If you live in Australia and have a spare $1900 you can still get your hands on one.
  • 8 Hide
    damianrobertjones , April 3, 2013 3:44 AM
    "the GeForce GTX 690 remains the most elegant high-end card we've ever used."

    I actually had a chance to own a 690 so I went for it and, upon the next reboot, I was greeted by a black screen. Yay. I looked on the web and, as expected, others were suffering with the same issue. An ebay auction later and I'm back to 2x 660s in sli. The moral of the story is: Just because it's expensive doesn't mean it'll work :( 
  • 3 Hide
    Memnarchon , April 3, 2013 3:45 AM
    Why not testing with FCAT? Or any frametime measurement? I think anyone who wants to spend so much money for a GPU would like to know this too.
  • 2 Hide
    eric4277 , April 3, 2013 3:54 AM
    Why did you include 7970 Crossfire and not 680 SLI?
  • 1 Hide
    utroz , April 3, 2013 3:59 AM
    Would have been nice to see the ARES II with the newest drivers as well just to see how much performance has increased since launch...
  • -6 Hide
    Cataclysm_ZA , April 3, 2013 4:57 AM
    No frame latency using FRAPS? Your readers consider it the industry standard now, Tom's, you should be implementing it on all your reviews in future. Even though FCAT is more work, timestamping using FRAPS is still an accurate and reliable measurement.
  • -4 Hide
    Marko Brekic , April 3, 2013 5:35 AM
    A true NV fanboy review...disturbing...
  • 5 Hide
    hero1 , April 3, 2013 5:54 AM
    Nice review. Those cards are awesome. But the Ares II is a beast of them all. ASUS should have made more of them, find a way to cut down on power consumption and market it for $1200. I would have snagged one as it is more than enough for my 2560x1440 Dell. The question is, will the true 7990 made by AMD deliver what ASUS and HIS did but with lower power and heat?
  • -1 Hide
    Onus , April 3, 2013 5:56 AM
    So sorry, but without FCAT measurements all of that work is for nought. I realize this article may have been researched and written before the significance of FCAT was realized, but that makes it an editorial task to not release it until it has been reworked, or even scrap it if it simply is no longer relevant.

    http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Frame-Rating-GeForce-GTX-Titan-GeForce-GTX-690-Radeon-HD-7990-HD-7970-Cross-6
  • 3 Hide
    the great randini , April 3, 2013 8:06 AM
    What a cool test, it is surprising how little power the titan uses.
  • 0 Hide
    nforce4max , April 3, 2013 8:23 AM
    Nice card and they should have made more as they would have sold well. The saving grace for this card isn't just the performance but the thermals and acoustics. The price however puts this card far out of reach for all but the 1% D:
Display more comments