

The sequential results aren't much different than our previous tests. Write performance is decidedly middle-of-the-road, while read performance is class-leading. When Samsung said it was going after the read-heavy enterprise space, the company wasn't kidding.
Previous
Next
Summary
- Meet Samsung's Read-Focused 845DC EVO SSD
- Inside Of Samsung's 845DC EVO
- How We Test Samsung's 845DC EVO SSD
- Results: Write Endurance Testing
- Results: 4 KB Random Performance And Latency
- Results: Performance Consistency
- Results: Enterprise Workload Performance
- Results: Sequential Performance
- Results: Enterprise Video Streaming
- Results: Power Consumption
- Samsung Introduces 3-Bit MLC NAND To The Enterprise
Ask a Category Expert
Yes, that's a fair analogy. Just like the Xeon E3-1275v3 is an i7-4770K, but with ECC support.
Hopefully the price will go down after launch, and then I see this being the best choice of webhosts.
Cheaper and adequate for that workload.
I'm sure worse things were said about Samsung at WWDC '14 yesterday
Now that you mention it.....
Nuff said.
You'd have to be out your mind to put TLC in a a critical environment.
For another, it's more about VALUE and that's the main point of the article. I assume the top SSD's in this category were MLC not TLC and also more expensive.