Page 1:Making A Case For Performance And Value
Page 2:Building With The Antec Solo II
Page 3:Building With The Corsair 400R
Page 4:Building With The In Win Buc
Page 5:Building With The MSI Ravager
Page 6:Building With The Raidmax Seiran
Page 7:Test Setup And Benchmarks
Page 8:Temperature, Noise, And Acoustic Efficiency
Page 9:Quality And Value: The Final Five, Evaluated
Page 10:One In 15: Picking An Overall Winner
Quality And Value: The Final Five, Evaluated
We required all of the submissions in our 15-case series to sell between $80 and $120. And yet, a few of them are actually available for less than $80 in some areas. That's not a bad problem to have (it's the opposite of what motherboard vendors generally try to get away with). Fortunately, all of these cases sell for at least $80 somewhere—and the manufacturers of the less expensive models agreed that their cases could still compete in the $80 category.
Available for as little as $70, Raidmax’s Seiran tops our performance value chart, even if we consider it as an $80 model. Using the same $80 baseline, MSI’s $77 Ravager is not far behind. The spread between those two would be even greater if this was a round-up of $70 to $120 cases.
We were reluctant to compare lower-end enclosures, because that discussion quickly degenerates into a complicated debate about quality. The Ravager is built better than the Seiran, but neither contender exhibits the quality we'd need to see for a recommendation in this competitive segment. Even at their lowest $77 and $70 online prices, both cases feel overpriced by about $20.
Ironically, the flimsiest case in today’s comparison actually seems like it might be worth $80: In Win’s Buc. However, the company has trouble winning us over with such obvious design deficits as the inability to run an EPS12V cable up the back of the motherboard tray. A $95 asking price adds insult to injury.
That leaves two strong contenders: Corsair’s 400R and Antec’s Solo II. The Solo II exhibits slightly better build quality, but the 400R delivers far better thermal performance. Antec tops our noise isolation chart, but the Solo II's thermal performance is so mediocre that the 400R scored more than 25% higher on our acoustic efficiency chart.
The Solo II’s admirable acoustic performance combined with barely-adequate thermal performance might have earned Antec a solid win in a comparison of quiet cases. However, Corsair’s 400R is the only case from today’s five contenders to offer the right balance of cooling, build quality, and features needed to satisfy the mid-budget gaming market—and win our stamp of approval.
- Making A Case For Performance And Value
- Building With The Antec Solo II
- Building With The Corsair 400R
- Building With The In Win Buc
- Building With The MSI Ravager
- Building With The Raidmax Seiran
- Test Setup And Benchmarks
- Temperature, Noise, And Acoustic Efficiency
- Quality And Value: The Final Five, Evaluated
- One In 15: Picking An Overall Winner