Our next set of tests simulates different enterprise-oriented workloads, including database, file server, Web server, and workstation configurations.
Notice that the results are pretty similar, regardless of whether you're looking at the 200 or 800 GB model. This is the case largely because high-end workloads are generally biased to read operations. Both capacities offer the same read performance, so it's no surprise to see them so close to each other.
At lower queue depths, the 800 GB SSD DC S3700 is consistently faster in each workload. It also exhibits an advantage in the file server workload. However, if your application mostly involves read operations, any of Intel's available capacities should be suitable. Our only warning would be that the 100 GB drive, which we don't have in-house, is rated for significantly lower write performance.
Our database workload (also categorized as transaction processing) involves purely random I/O. Its profile consists of 67% reads and 33% writes using 8 KB transfers.
The file server workload consists of 80% random reads of varying transfer sizes.
The Web server (100% read, varying transfer size) and workstation (80% reads, 80% random) workloads show the same basic trend.
- The SSD DC S3700: Meet Intel's Flagship Enterprise SSD
- Inside Intel's SSD DC S3700
- Performance Consistency
- Test Setup, Benchmarks, And Methodology
- Results: 4 KB Random Performance And Latency
- Results: Enterprise Workload Performance
- Results: Sequential Performance
- Results: Enterprise Video Streaming Performance
- Power Consumption
- Intel's SSD DC S3700 Redefines The Way We Look At Performance