2013 Subaru Legacy Sedan: A Mid-Size Ride With Practical Tech

Eyesight Technology

Subaru is one of the first manufacturers offering advanced driver assistance technologies on a bread-and-butter mid-size vehicle. The privilege isn't cheap; you'll have to shell out an extra $3,940. Really though, you're paying $1,295 for this functionality specifically, since it's only available in a combination package that includes the moonroof and navigation system.

The company's Eyesight system employs two cameras mounted above the rear-view mirror. Shapes and contrast are captured by the sensors and processed by a module that filters out unwanted noise, like repeating patterns. Images from both cameras are compared, determining the distance to a potential collision. Subaru claims this aid works like a set of always-on human eyes, hence the name Eyesight. The system is networked into the Legacy's other subsystems (gas, brake, other sensors) to enable them with active driving assistance.

Eyesight is subject to a couple of limitations, and it naturally requires a clear view through the windshield. Fortunately, the cameras are placed within the reach of the wiper blades, so the technology isn't dependent on how often you wash your car. Weather and direct sunlight can cause visibility issues for the cameras, though. Additionally, low-contrast environments and repetitive patterns may also be problematic, since the cameras rely heavily on contrast. 

Pre-Collision Features

Eyesight can completely stop the Legacy when it's moving at speeds of up to 19 MPH without driving input. Pre-collision will do this up to three times before disabling itself. At that point, you have to restart the vehicle for the system to work again. Subaru believes that if you have three close calls necessitating intervention, you need to pay more attention while driving.

Audible alerts do continue working at that point though, letting you know when a potential collision is detected. Throughout the alert process, the system prepares the brakes to apply maximum pressure without needing you to slam down on the pedal. The system expects you to react to alerts, and it backs you up unobtrusively.

The Eyesight pre-collision system's most useful application is its ability to cut throttle, preventing you from driving into a barrier. For example, imagine sitting at a stop light ready to turn right. There’s a car in front of you slowly accelerating into the same turn, so you follow suit. Suddenly, that person stops, as you're accelerating. Eyesight recognizes this and pulls the plug, preventing you from plowing into the car at full speed.

During our week with Subaru's 2013 Legacy 2.5i Limited, we didn't really get a chance to put Eyesight through its paces. There were a couple of instances where an alert popped up, but we were never traveling under 19 MPH, allowing the car to stop itself. Subaru also advised against having us stage an emergency situation to showcase Eyesight, suggesting the system might not react in time. This is one of those features that you hope to never have to use, and when the time comes, having it should be better than not.

Adaptive Cruise Control

Adaptive cruise control is one of our favorite driver assistance features. While most of the implementations we've reviewed up until now relied on laser sensors, Subaru employs the same cameras responsible for Eyesight. They're good at speeds as high as 87 MPH and capable of bringing the Legacy to a complete stop from the maximum velocity. The camera-based system isn't perfect, of course. Windy roads can trigger false warnings and unexpected braking. But we don't think this is too big of a deal; if you're on a windy road, enjoy the thing and don't use adaptive cruise control in the first place.

Because adaptive cruise control works from a complete stop up to 87 MPH, it makes driving in Seattle's stop-and-go traffic much more palatable. We simply set the cruise control to the 60 MPH speed limit and let the adaptive system work its magic. At a complete stop, it'd hold the Legacy still and disengage cruise after a couple of seconds, requiring a foot on the brake pedal. Once traffic started moving again, we simply lifted our foot and tapped the resume toggle; adaptive cruise was back in action at that point.

We enjoyed adaptive cruise quite a bit during our week with Subaru's 2013 Legacy 2.5i Limited. It made repeated trips to Seattle (and back) during heavy traffic much easier. Systems able to operate at a full range of speeds, such as the one found in the Legacy, have completely spoiled us.

Lane Departure And Sway Warning

Subaru's Eyesight package also includes lane departure and sway warning. Unlike the active system we looked at in 2013 Infiniti JX35: Getting Us One Step Closer To A Driverless Car, the Eyesight system simply warns you using annoying audible and visual alerts. As with most lane departure technologies, Eyesight's cameras monitor lane markers. If you cross a lane or sway side-to-side without using a turn signal, the warnings go off. The Legacy doesn't intervene, though. It's up to you to control the car.

We played around with the lane departure feature and didn't find it too bothersome. It really only sounded alerts when we rode the line between two lanes. To be sure, it was more reliable than the implementation we tested in Infiniti's JX35. Sure, it hit us with an occasional misread during rainstorms, but we expected that from a camera-based system. In comparison (and perhaps more problematic), the Infiniti version had more issues on sunny days. Fortunately, if you don't like the feature at all, you can turn it off with the push of a button.

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
30 comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
  • soundping
    Subaru 2013 Legacy 2.5i Limited: $25,895 isn't that bad for a nice ride.
    2
  • ukee1593
    Nice to see Toms doing car review now, especially with so many cars having computer based interfaces now.

    Very good to see manufacturers installing driving aids such as collision detection and adaptive cruise control now. These are the precursors to completely autonomous cars and the more advanced these systems get, the closer we may get to fully autonomous cars in the near future.

    My question is; when are manufacturers going to give us the option of installing a 3rd party tablet such as an Ipad or a Nexus 7/10 in the dashboard rather than putting up with their pathetic built in "infotainment" systems. I would definitely choose a car with just a blank space in the dashboard (plus charging port) for a tablet rather than buying one with a built in system. Heck I might even pay more for it. All we need is a standardized connection to interface speaker systems and steering wheel controls to the tablet.
    9
  • apache_lives
    no.
    -5
  • ubercake
    But does it have a big back seat (if you know what I'm saying?)?

    Seriously, though, within the past 5-10 years I've found many mid-sized cars these days to be small from a height standpoint in the back seat. If you're over 5'9" and sit in the back, you have to bend your neck to fit. If populations are trending toward taller people, why are car companies making back seats for shorter people?

    If you want to have a vehicle where adults can sit in the back these days, they almost force you into full-size or CUV/SUV options. As a result, this seems to discourage carpooling. Maybe this is how they can push to sell more cars?
    0
  • Onus
    Please stop this. Form a partnership with an automotive site for cross-coverage, but please stop direct coverage of automotive news.
    -7
  • thebigt42
    Needs a wrx or sti option :)
    2
  • wysir
    I'm waiting for my BRZ to arrive in August. Such a long wait... =(
    2
  • gxpbecker
    I am still sad to see the 2.5GT. The 07 Spec B was an amazing car. I am hoping the beef up that 3.6R or bring it in the 2.0GT fasion with their new turbo engine based of the BRZ's. (and redesign the car... still a bit ugly and this is coming form a person who has owned 6 subarus)
    1
  • gxpbecker
    **Still sad to see teh 2.5GT go*
    2
  • ericjohn004
    The only thing that worrys me with these types of cars is that what if one of these things fails? Or worse, what if it causes the gas pedal to be smashed or the brakes to be smashed while your driving? I'm sure they make sure these things are functional, but anything can happen with electronics.

    I love Tom's reviews. Your not going to find a better review site in the world.
    0
  • tuanies
    Anonymous said:
    Nice to see Toms doing car review now, especially with so many cars having computer based interfaces now.

    Very good to see manufacturers installing driving aids such as collision detection and adaptive cruise control now. These are the precursors to completely autonomous cars and the more advanced these systems get, the closer we may get to fully autonomous cars in the near future.

    My question is; when are manufacturers going to give us the option of installing a 3rd party tablet such as an Ipad or a Nexus 7/10 in the dashboard rather than putting up with their pathetic built in "infotainment" systems. I would definitely choose a car with just a blank space in the dashboard (plus charging port) for a tablet rather than buying one with a built in system. Heck I might even pay more for it. All we need is a standardized connection to interface speaker systems and steering wheel controls to the tablet.



    They probably won't because of liability / legality problems. Scosche teased an iPad double din mount with amp but cancelled the product. The problem is tablets have no lock out while driving, which opens the doors up to legal troubles for them. We did just get the Parrot Asteroid Smart double din with Android 2.3 in and will have a review of that soon.

    Anonymous said:
    But does it have a big back seat (if you know what I'm saying?)?

    Seriously, though, within the past 5-10 years I've found many mid-sized cars these days to be small from a height standpoint in the back seat. If you're over 5'9" and sit in the back, you have to bend your neck to fit. If populations are trending toward taller people, why are car companies making back seats for shorter people?

    If you want to have a vehicle where adults can sit in the back these days, they almost force you into full-size or CUV/SUV options. As a result, this seems to discourage carpooling. Maybe this is how they can push to sell more cars?


    Its a styling trade-off. Sloped backs look better than boxy ones so its a trade off made to appeal make cars more visually pleasing. I'd always take a station wagon over a sedan though, crossovers are just more expensive station wagons with less practicality.

    Anonymous said:
    Please stop this. Form a partnership with an automotive site for cross-coverage, but please stop direct coverage of automotive news.


    The type of coverage we do on automobiles is completely different from the usual 0-60, skidpad and performance based coverage of automotive outlets. We still focus mostly on the tech.

    Anonymous said:
    I'm waiting for my BRZ to arrive in August. Such a long wait... =(


    Very jealous, great cars.

    Anonymous said:
    I am still sad to see the 2.5GT. The 07 Spec B was an amazing car. I am hoping the beef up that 3.6R or bring it in the 2.0GT fasion with their new turbo engine based of the BRZ's. (and redesign the car... still a bit ugly and this is coming form a person who has owned 6 subarus)


    The 3.6R is still an automatic though. I would love a 6-speed manual on the 3.6R. I wanted to buy a Spec B when they were new but the Subaru sales guy was so persistent that it turned me off the brand. The 2.5GT is still sold in Japan iirc. My best friend's dad has a manual 2.5GT wagon, loved that generation. I wish they still had manual wagons that aren't Outbacks >_<
    2
  • basketcase87
    thebigt42Needs a wrx or sti option

    Please no. The reason wrx still means something is because it's not an "option" that they've decided to add onto every car in their lineup. Keep it where it belongs, as a small rally-size car.
    2
  • tuanies
    Anonymous said:
    The only thing that worrys me with these types of cars is that what if one of these things fails? Or worse, what if it causes the gas pedal to be smshed or the brakes to be smashed while your driving? I'm sure they make sure these things are functional, but anything can happen with electronics.
    H
    I love Tom's reviews. Your not going to find a better review site in the world.


    I believe the brake should override the gas pedal on newer cars.
    Anonymous said:
    thebigt42Needs a wrx or sti option

    Please no. The reason wrx still means something is because it's not an "option" that they've decided to add onto every car in their lineup. Keep it where it belongs, as a small rally-size car.


    They've made Forester STIs in the past but the hot Legacy was the B4 Blitzen or just Legacy GT
    0
  • g-unit1111
    This is pretty cool, I always like seeing new automotive tech. Maybe you could review the Dodge Dart next.
    0
  • tuanies
    Anonymous said:
    This is pretty cool, I always like seeing new automotive tech. Maybe you could review the Dodge Dart next.


    They don't have one available in the PNW fleet. The 2014 Grand Cherokee Diesel is support to make its way up here this summer though...
    0
  • sanilmahambre
    Nothing so special about this car in this price range. The opponents are racing ahead already!
    -1
  • gggplaya
    ukee1593Nice to see Toms doing car review now, especially with so many cars having computer based interfaces now. Very good to see manufacturers installing driving aids such as collision detection and adaptive cruise control now. These are the precursors to completely autonomous cars and the more advanced these systems get, the closer we may get to fully autonomous cars in the near future. My question is; when are manufacturers going to give us the option of installing a 3rd party tablet such as an Ipad or a Nexus 7/10 in the dashboard rather than putting up with their pathetic built in "infotainment" systems. I would definitely choose a car with just a blank space in the dashboard (plus charging port) for a tablet rather than buying one with a built in system. Heck I might even pay more for it. All we need is a standardized connection to interface speaker systems and steering wheel controls to the tablet.


    Yes, because that's not a lawsuit waiting to happen.

    (Police officer) - "So what was so important that caused you to cross lanes and kill a family of 5?"
    (You) - "I was playing angry birds."
    0
  • RobAC
    Nice article.

    Good to see other sectors served by various tech covered.
    0
  • tuanies
    Anonymous said:
    Nothing so special about this car in this price range. The opponents are racing ahead already!


    Its a car built for the purpose of AWD, some people need it year round and this car is still worlds ahead of other midsizes for AWD. But yes the others are racing ahead in terms of styling, infotainment, etc... The mid-size segment is very exciting and competitive IMO.
    1
  • V B
    T G tried reviewing cameras, it did not work now cars, looks like grasping for the straws to save the site. What next? Baby's pacifiers ?
    Just saying...
    1