Wireless Performance
Two scenarios are being tested here:
- Five feet, line-of-sight: The wireless device is set five feet from the router without any obstructions.
- 20 feet, no line-of-sight: The wireless device is set 20 feet from the router and there are three drywall obstructions in our testing environment that reflect the possible degradation you might see in an indoor environment.
All devices idle for two minutes before testing in order to prevent power-saving rules in the OS from affecting wireless performance.

Most tablets don't support 802.11n connectivity through the 5.0 GHz band. Sticking with 2.4 GHz should save a little bit on battery life, but it also means vendors can use a slightly cheaper networking controller. Even still, we're prefer the option to use 5.0 GHz, if only to take advantage of another frequency less likely to be affected by interference.

Previous
Next
Summary
- Tablet PCs: It's All About Device Reduction
- Meet Samsung's XE700T1A Tablet PC
- Samsung's Optimized UI And Lots Of Preloaded Apps
- CPU Performance: Core i5-2467M, ULV Sandy Bridge
- GPU Performance: Intel HD Graphics Versus HD Graphics 3000
- PCMark 7: Speedy Storage, No Disappointments
- Real-World Performance Against Tablets
- Battery Life And Recharge Time
- Display Quality: Color Gamut
- Display Quality: White And Black Uniformity
- Image Quality Examined: Front- And Rear-Facing Cameras
- Docking Station: Forget Your Desktop
- Forget HDMI. Intel's WiDi Makes It Easy
- Wireless Performance
- Samsung's Series 7 11.6" Slate Is The Best Windows-Based Tablet We've Seen
- Background Information On Our Benchmarks
Ask a Category Expert
I think it'd be a lot more wiser to buy a laptop for that price and get a much more efficient and powerful piece of tech.
http://forum.tabletpcreview.com/samsung/46145-everyone-who-own-slate-please-post-you-batchnumber-modelnummer-state-screen.html
I mean.. -.-