All about Monitors
 Latest Monitors articles
All Monitors articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : Interactive Buddy Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
crazy : PC Breakdown What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
Ads

Sponsored links

Evaluating Different Viewing Angle Technologies

Previous
1:01 PM - 06/30/1999 by Udo Schroeder


Figure 4: MVA offers faster response times and very good viewing angles, however, the market share of Fujitsu's technology is still quite small.

The TN+Film solution does not result in notable improvements in the response time. Having said this, these systems are low-cost, have a high production yield and improve the viewing angle to acceptable values. The market share of these displays will fall back in the long term.

IPS can already claim a high share of the market as there are a number of manufacturers, e.g. Hitachi and NEC, that have backed this technology. Decisive factors for the success of these displays are the high viewing angle up to 170 degrees and the acceptable response times.

From a technical point of view, MVA is the best solution. Viewing angles up to 160 degrees are almost as good as cathode ray tube monitors. The response times of approximately 20 milliseconds are also suitable for video playback. The market share of these displays is still very small but growing.

Talkback
Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links