- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (29) |
- Share
Power Consumption Testing
Simply measuring idle and peak power isn’t necessarily enough, as power used during drive activity can vary a lot. Hence we decided to measure power while the drives are working on specific workloads. All power measurements are executed at the drive’s power connector, using a Voltcraft VC940 multimeter, so the results reflect the actual drive power requirement very accurately. The multimeter we selected has a USB port, which allows us to track power at all times. Typically we use 1-second increments. Since we need to track both 5 V and 12 V levels, we use two of these multimeters. Thanks to this feature we can not only look at average power consumption for specific workloads, but can also track the total power used for a workload or after a certain period of time.
The Voltcraft device provides nice bang for the buck—the device isn’t cheap, but it offers sufficient precision for our purposes. There are better solutions, but our results don’t need to be at a scientific level.
| Measurement | Purpose | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Power at idle | Low power idle requirement | Simple measurement after 10 minutes of system inactivity |
| HD Movie Playback | Determine power consumption at defined stream | We use the VLC player version 9.8h and play “The Big Buck Bunny” between 49s and 469s |
| IOmeter Streaming Reads | Determine power requirement at maximum sequential throughput | Execute streaming read benchmark with IOMeter, track peak power |
| IOmeter Workstation I/O | Determine power requirement at maximum random I/O activity | Execute workstation benchmark with IOMeter, track peak power |
Efficiency Testing
Since we are able to track the amount of power for each of the benchmarks, we can easily look at the performance score per watt-hour used, which we do using the IOmeter benchmark profiles. That’s watt-hours, by the way, not watts per hour. An alternative is to use an average benchmark result and divide it by the average power used, to calculate performance per watt.
Temperature Testing
We use a laser-assisted infrared thermometer to measure the surface temperature of hard drives and SSDs. Since we want to look at peak temperature, we execute the IOMeter benchmark runs before measuring surface temperature. We examine all six sides of the SSD and work with the highest temperature reading we get.
Noise Testing
This is a critical aspect of our testing that many of our readers have been requesting, but at the same time we recognize that the testing does not always make sense. We built a sound-proofed box many years ago, which allows us to place a hard drive on a flat and dampened surface within the box, and insert a decibel meter from the top. It is important to maintain exactly the same distance between the noise emitting product and the microphone of the decibel meter, or the results will not be comparable. While we will keep doing this for all new drives, there are several things to keep in mind:
- Measured noise in dB(A) does not always reflect subjective noise. It may happen that a drive is objectively quiet, although some people perceive it as being more noisy.
- Measured noise may include vibrational noise. It may happen that a drive may appear noisier than it actually is, as we cannot fully eliminate noise from drive vibration.
- Is noise really relevant? For all hard drives running at 5,400 RPM and below, we believe that the noise level is only relevant for a very small fraction of all users; 7,200 RPM desktop hard drives are also typically quiet. As a result, any fan—especially one on a graphics card—is going to be noisier than a drive in idle. Drive activity noise, however, is more important.
We measure noise during an IOmeter workstation test run, and when the drive is in active idle mode (spinning), and track the peak values we get. We repeat these tests three times to make sure that results aren’t influenced by external sound sources, as the measuring equipment is highly sensitive.
- 1 / 2
- Next
-
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Min spec CPU for HTPC?
- Biggest Bottleneck
- Need suggestions on quality PSU
- Advice on a memory purchase?
- $1500-$1700 build
- can i get help to choose if these parts ive found work well etc
- Im newbie building my first system HELP!!
- Good build for the future?
- I got the 9800 GX2!!!!
- Raid 10 vs 15K SAS
- Old Raptors vs. New Raptors
- how do I know if my HD is operating at sata 3.0?
- High capacity HDD!!!
- Which HDD brand do you recommend?
Related articles
-
Tom's Storage Charts 2009: A New Test Environment
Our old 3.6 GHz Xeon is making way for a brand new X58-based Core i7 solution with PCI-X and PCIe, which we will use to test hard drives, SSDs, controllers, and other storage products. We introduce you to our new reference platform and talk about testing!
-
Find Your Notebook Hard Drive: 2.5" Performance Charts
We've had performance charts for 3.5" desktop hard drives. Today we extend this service and include 2.5" notebook hard drives.
-
Tom's Summer CPU Charts Assault
Intel's Core 2 might be the cure to Pentium pains, but it isn't necessarily the best choice for everyone. We test-drove 83 processors across a 37-benchmark parcours and once again offer the best processor comparison on the web.
Best offers
|
My Book Essential Edition External... | $148.00 ServerSupply.com More info |
|
eGo Desktop Portable 1TB Hard Drive... | $115.99 Dell Home More info |
|
My Passport Essential 500GB Portable... | $139.99 OfficeMax More info |
|
WD Elements External 1.5TB 3.5" Hard... | $129.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Starck External 1TB 3.5" Hard Drive... | $125.99 Dell Home More info |
All performance charts
- Intel SSD Prices Drop by Up to $100
- GE's Holographic Storage to Yield 500 GB Discs
- Seagate Claims to be Easiest PC Backup Yet
Partners
The Games selection
adventure :
Ray
Adventure game, South Park style. Pick the way the story goes by picking an answer among those offered.
|
arcade :
Call of Atlantis
Start a new and exciting quest in this game that is a mixture of 3 popular games : the match-3, hidden objects, and adventure. Bring together the...
|







These charts are a disaster. The same exact label is used to denote multiple drives. E.g., Western Digital Raptor or Seagate 7200.11 are each repeated over a half dozen times on each chart. Trying to find a specific model requires you to follow the product link over and over again on each chart. I gave up, still not sure if the one I was interested in is even listed.....
woot charts ! now we need gpu ones ( i dont mind waiting til Q2 is over )
Loving the reinstatement of the 'article index' drop down menu... But I think someone needs to smooth out the rough edges. Minor points, but ones I will make nonetheless.
First, the dimensions are such that you have vertical AND horizontal scroll... kinda annoying.
Second, the 'index button' width is slightly smaller than the actual drop down menu that appears. So if you click the down arrow and move your cursor directly down (which because of the width issue, is not over the drop down menu) it deselects the index and it disappears. ARGGHHH
These charts are a disaster. The same exact label is used to denote multiple drives. E.g., Western Digital Raptor or Seagate 7200.11 are each repeated over a half dozen times on each chart. Trying to find a specific model requires you to follow the product link over and over again on each chart. I gave up, still not sure if the one I was interested in is even listed.....
He's right, and if I select WD and Samsung as filters, and then choose a benchmark, I get all the HDD listed and i have to choose my filters every time I select a benchmark. The old chart system before the site was "pimped" was way better then this.
The charts are bad, but the last version was bad too. The one before that was fine though.
I said we'd get harddrive review this week and lo and behold pappa was right.
I like the drop down menu now... Its much faster :-)
I like the drop down menu now... Its much faster :-)
ye but I'd gladly trade the menu for the old layout with avatars and less gray on gray.
Yay! drop down menu is back!
Yes but we were told we'd have our avatars back?i don't see them ,do you?
yeah avatars would be nice to help break up the monotonous comment section. its just one big blob of text.
WHAT HAPPENED TO OCZ DRIVES!!! Did Intel slip some money under the table?
Yes but we were told we'd have our avatars back?i don't see them ,do you?
Jane said there was a chance, but she didn't promise.
there has to be a better way to do this. all i care about is real world performance. these charts are useless.
The charts are useless if you don't know what you need. Yes. But they wouldn't be useless to most of us if we could see which model was performing how well. I know what I need to care most about is average read speed on all my drives except the system one, where access time is relevant as well.
Ditto on the useless chart theme!!!
No numbers for Intel power consumption!???? what a joke. C'mon Tom's surely you can do better.
I don't get two things.
1. If this is a test bed then shouldn't you be using the fastest CPU available to you? Also I believe the i920 has a 4.8GT/s, so it can be a limiting factor when you are testing other components.
2. Why are you not including the Intel SSD's They have been around for a while and they are still missing from your SSD charts.
No Intel SSD numbers at all! that's got to be the biggest oversight in the history of the universe.