Best offers
|
P7P55D Motherboard (Intel Socket H... | $149.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
M4A785TD-V EVO AMD 785G/SB710 Socket... | $99.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GA-P55-UD4P Motherboard (Intel Socket... | $169.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GA-P55-UD3R Motherboard (Intel Socket... | $139.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
M4A78T-E Motherboard (AMD, AM3, AMD... | $129.99 Newegg.com More info |
Popular Searches
- western digital reliable
- samsung spinpoint f1 benchmark
- wd5000aaks jumper settings
- wd5000aaks jumper
- test wd5000aaks
- test my hard drive speed
- western digital benchmark
- wd5000aaks benchmark
- the latest hard drive
- western digital wd5000aaks test
- multiple internal hard drives
- spinpoint f1 benchmark
- wd5000aaks firmware
- wd5000aaks enclosures
- western digital wd5000aaks review
Partners
The Games selection
kids :
Bob
Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
|
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
Ads
Sponsored links
11:11 AM - 12/21/2007 by
The Editors of Tom's Hardware
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (4) |
- Share
Western Digital provided the 15 test hard drives for our test systems. We would have opted for a Raptor hard drive, but its 150 GB doesn't provide sufficient capacity to provide our raw benchmark data and the Windows installation, including the necessary applications. The WD5000AAKS is a Caviar SE16 drive with 16 MB cache, Serial ATA/300 and a 7,200 RPM spindle speed. Though it cannot compete with the latest hard drive generation (Samsung Spinpoint F1 or Seagate Barracuda 7200.11), it is a solid performer and a reliable workhorse. Thanks to its under $120 price tag, this model offers an exceptional price/performance value.
Topics being discussed on the forums
- Gigabyte HD 3850 and VP930P display problem [Graphic & Displays]
- DX10 games are out, and I'm running them all under DX9... [Graphic & Displays]
- AMD vs. Intel: Battery Life Investigated [CPU & Components]
- REALLY Bad Tom's article... [CPU & Components]
- gpu charts (what is the setup) [Graphic & Displays]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- An $89 Pentium Dual Core that Runs at 3.2 GHz
- Toms New Reference System
- Are they for real???
- Intel regains crown
- PROOF - Conroe Was Not Faithful
- First Timer - Looking for Help
- Having Some issues with Q6600 OC
- AM2 motherboards???
- Your input needed! First time builder.
- Parts on the way - but numerous questions ...
- Another cheap gaming build
- First Build- but you don't have to look at a list of parts!!
- Do these specs sound ok?
- gpu charts (what is the setup)
I happened to buy smart or dumb enough to pretty much buy this rig a few - several months after it came out... I'm just now looking into OC'ing it. If anyone's got good links to tut's I'm game
*I bought this rig several months ago and have LOVED it. I'm just now looking into OC'ing it. If anyone's got good links to tut's I'm game.*
THANKS!
Not sure what happened there w/the prev...
Why do you use awful color schemes like this in your graphs? Yesterday's $1,250 machine benchmark graphs were the first I had actually been able to easily read. Light/Dark + Blue/Green/Red makes SO much sense. I can easily tell which system is which, and which bar is the overclocked bar. Blue, Green, Red, Purple shows no information on whether it is overclocked or not, and does not provide an easy way to tell which system is which.
To make things worse, the key at the bottom of every graph (that I have to look at every time) is always in a different order.
Can we please have more graphs like the $1,250 build?
wrong article, sorry.