AMD HD3D and the TriDef Ignition Driver:
Good 3D result in DirectX 9 with Virtual 3D mode; DirectX 11 does not work
In DirectX 9, the TriDef driver provides an excellent result with Virtual 3D mode
Aliens vs. Predator works beautifully with the TriDef Ignition driver in DirectX 9 mode, but only with Virtual 3D enabled. We couldn’t get a stereoscopic result at all with the game running in DirectX 11.
Again, in this game, DirectX 11 doesn’t offer much over DirectX 9. Thus, the loss isn't significant.
Nvidia 3D Vision:
Not recommended
The Nvidia 3D Vision solution is unplayable in this game
This game displays significant lighting and motion blur anomalies with 3D Vision. While motion blur can be disabled, no combination of settings could get rid of the lighting differences hitting each eye. Thus, we consider this game unplayable with 3D Vision.
- The State Of 3D Gaming
- Displays, Software, And Settings
- Test System And Benchmark Setup
- StarCraft II
- Civilization V
- World Of Warcraft
- Lord Of The Rings Online
- Star Trek Online
- Bulletstorm
- Crysis 2
- Just Cause 2
- Lost Planet 2
- Aliens Vs. Predator
- Left 4 Dead 2
- Metro 2033
- F1 2010
- Need 4 Speed: Hot Pursuit
- Mass Effect 2
- Dragon Age 2
- Deus Ex: Human Revolution
- DiRT 3
- Two Compelling 3D Solutions With Strengths And Weaknesses
So for you it'd be responsible journalism if we noticed a problem with hardware and buried it so our readers wouldn't find out?
Or are you saying we shouldn't report negative findings we notice from any product? Or do you mean just AMD?
From where I'm sitting, what you're suggesting isn't even handed and fair journalism...
No. The borders are there to help you focus. If the images were touching, your eyes would pick out the discrepancy on the edge and make crossviewing more difficult.
And what's with "jerks"...? Was name calling really necessary?
Anyone notice the bevel on the Samsung model. That beautiful for multi-monitor.
Time for Bulldozer!!!
in my opinion both are great......
So for you it'd be responsible journalism if we noticed a problem with hardware and buried it so our readers wouldn't find out?
Or are you saying we shouldn't report negative findings we notice from any product? Or do you mean just AMD?
From where I'm sitting, what you're suggesting isn't even handed and fair journalism...
No. The borders are there to help you focus. If the images were touching, your eyes would pick out the discrepancy on the edge and make crossviewing more difficult.
And what's with "jerks"...? Was name calling really necessary?
Hype: maybe.
But as far as games that correctly exploit it, they are already out there. There are some game titles that have superb stereoscopic support already.