AMD HD3D and the TriDef Ignition Driver:
Excellent 3D result in DirectX 9; DirectX 11 does not work
The TriDef driver does an excellent job in DirectX 9
This game works very nicely with the TriDef driver in normal 3D mode as long as the game is rendered using DirectX 9. DirectX 11 does not work at all. Frankly, the DirectX 11 enhancements aren’t particularly significant in this game (they're mainly used to improve performance, rather than augment visual quality), so you probably won’t notice a difference.
If you try to use TriDef's Virtual 3D mode instead, you'll end up with a depth-oriented anomalies.
Nvidia 3D Vision:
Excellent 3D result
Nvidia's 3D Vision works equally well in DirectX 9 or 11
This game appears to work flawlessly with Nvidia’s 3D Vision. There’s not much else to say, which we consider to be a good thing.
- The State Of 3D Gaming
- Displays, Software, And Settings
- Test System And Benchmark Setup
- StarCraft II
- Civilization V
- World Of Warcraft
- Lord Of The Rings Online
- Star Trek Online
- Bulletstorm
- Crysis 2
- Just Cause 2
- Lost Planet 2
- Aliens Vs. Predator
- Left 4 Dead 2
- Metro 2033
- F1 2010
- Need 4 Speed: Hot Pursuit
- Mass Effect 2
- Dragon Age 2
- Deus Ex: Human Revolution
- DiRT 3
- Two Compelling 3D Solutions With Strengths And Weaknesses
So for you it'd be responsible journalism if we noticed a problem with hardware and buried it so our readers wouldn't find out?
Or are you saying we shouldn't report negative findings we notice from any product? Or do you mean just AMD?
From where I'm sitting, what you're suggesting isn't even handed and fair journalism...
No. The borders are there to help you focus. If the images were touching, your eyes would pick out the discrepancy on the edge and make crossviewing more difficult.
And what's with "jerks"...? Was name calling really necessary?
Anyone notice the bevel on the Samsung model. That beautiful for multi-monitor.
Time for Bulldozer!!!
in my opinion both are great......
So for you it'd be responsible journalism if we noticed a problem with hardware and buried it so our readers wouldn't find out?
Or are you saying we shouldn't report negative findings we notice from any product? Or do you mean just AMD?
From where I'm sitting, what you're suggesting isn't even handed and fair journalism...
No. The borders are there to help you focus. If the images were touching, your eyes would pick out the discrepancy on the edge and make crossviewing more difficult.
And what's with "jerks"...? Was name calling really necessary?
Hype: maybe.
But as far as games that correctly exploit it, they are already out there. There are some game titles that have superb stereoscopic support already.