Best offers
|
P7P55D Motherboard (Intel Socket H... | $149.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
M4A785TD-V EVO AMD 785G/SB710 Socket... | $84.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GA-P55-UD4P Motherboard (Intel Socket... | $169.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GA-P55-UD3R Motherboard (Intel Socket... | $139.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
M4A78T-E Motherboard (AMD, AM3, AMD... | $129.99 Newegg.com More info |
Popular Searches
- graphics benchmark tom
- workstation benchmarks
- iometer webserver benchmark
- crysis dolby digital out
- unreal tournament 3 in dolby digital
- post processing unreal tournament 3
- what is low level benchmark
- iometer fileserver benchmark
- run supreme commander 800x600
- iometer 2003.05.10 file server test
- motherboard comparison benchmarks
- lowest 16 9 resolution
- supreme commander patch guide
- iometer benchmark tests webserver
- iometer benchmark tests
Partners
The Games selection
violent :
Interactive Buddy
Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
|
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
Ads
Sponsored links
8:04 AM - 02/25/2008 by
Thomas Soderstrom
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (7) |
- Share
| Benchmarks and Settings | |
|---|---|
| 3D-Games | |
| Crysis | Version: 1.1
Video Modes: 800x600 (low), 1920x1200 (high) Video Quality: Low Details (low), Very High Details (high) Anti-aliasing: Off (low), 8x (high) Benchmark: Benchmark_CPU.bat |
| Supreme Commander | Version: 3.220
Video Modes: 1024x768 (low), 1920x1200 (high) Video Quality: Lowest Details (low), Highest Details (high) Anti-aliasing: Off (low), 8x (high) Graphics: Medium Test Path: Options/Performance/Test Settings |
| Unreal Tournament 3 | Version: 1.2 (Dual-Core Patch)
Video Modes: 640x480 (low), 1920x1200 (high) Video Quality: Lowest Details (low), Highest Details (high) Post Processing: Default (low), Intense (high) Benchmark: 16-bot botmatch (war-marketdistrict) |
| Applications | |
| Grisoft AVG Anti-Virus | Version: 7.5.467
Virus Base: 269.6.1/776 Benchmark: Scanning 3.82 GB Application Folder |
| Maxon Cinema 4D | Version: 10.008
Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Benchmark: Rose Drop, 8-bits (50 Frames) |
| Adobe Photoshop CS3 | Version: 10.0x20070321
Filtering from a 69 MB TIF-Photo Benchmark: Tom's Guide-Benchmark V1.0.0.4 |
| Rarlab Winrar | Version 3.70 BETA 8
Compression = Best Dictionary = 4096 kB Uncompressed Folder Size: 642 MB |
| Video | |
| TMPEGEnc 4.0 Xpress | Version: 4.2.10.211
Import File: Terminator 2 SE DVD (2 Minutes) Resolution: 720x576 (PAL) 16:9 Audio: Dolby Digital, 48000 Hz, 6-Channel, English Advanced Acoustic Engine MP3 Encoder (160kb/s) |
| DivX 6.6 | Version: 6.6.1
Profile: Home Theater Profile (720 x 576) 1-pass, 780 kb/s Encoding mode: Insane Quality Enhanced multithreading |
| XviD 1.1.2 | Version: 1.1.2
Target quantizer: 1.00 (maximum quality) |
| Clone DVD 2 | Version: 2.908
DVD "Terminator II SE" (English version) Transcoding from DVD-9 to DVD-4.7 Audio: English Dolby AC-3/6 (surround) - DTS Subtitles: None |
| Synthetics | |
| SiSoftware Sandra XII | Version 2007.5.11.40
Memory Test = Bandwidth Benchmark |
| Hard Drive Performance | |
| Low Level Performance | h2benchw 3.6 (by c'T Magazine |
| I/O Performance | IOMeter 2003.05.10:
Fileserver Benchmark Webserver Benchmark Database Benchmark Workstation Benchmark |
| Audio | |
| Rightmark Audio Analyzer | Version: 6.0.6
Stream Quality: 16 bits, 44.1 khz |
Topics being discussed on the forums
- Help choosing a new motherboard [Motherboards & Memory]
- Which is better? [Motherboards & Memory]
- Which card(s) would be best??? [Graphic & Displays]
- Q8400 stronger than the Phenom II quads when OC'ed over 3 Ghz? [CPU & Components]
- 260 and 4870 are the same price. Help! [Graphic & Displays]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- AMD: Core i7 as being out of touch with the marketplace
- The Ultimate Hardware Guide [Last Update: 4-14-06]
- MSI Eclipse SLI with Core i7 965 Extreme OC Review
- Help me choose components to OC E8400?
- Intel p45, p35 or x48 ??
- Formula or DQ6 pls help URGENT
- X48 Motherboard Comparison: Meet the new boss
- Q9550 vs i7 920
- Expert advice needed on new home build!
- New to the forums and need opinions/suggestions on my first build.
- New Gamer/BluRay Rig
- My First System Build -- Hoping for Your Expert Advice!
- GTX 260 SLI reviews?
- Is a 4870 X2 worth it over these other options?
Help please.Can this board be configured with the first two (SATA) HDs mirrored and the other drives JBOD? Thank you in advance.
Great review, very detailed and informative. But I must say that either you were lucky that your X38 P5E3 Deluxe came with a better-than-average chipset or that I wasn't so lucky and got a malfunctioning one.
I have an Asus Maximus Formula which is, as you know, the Republic of Gamer's solution for the X38 and recently bought a Patriot Extreme Performance 1150mhz PC2-9600. Whenever I try anything above 1020mhz for the RAM my PC reboots; the higher it is the less time it takes to do it. At 1020mhz it'll only reboot if I run something more demanding like 3dMark06 or any new game, at 1100mhz it'll barely show the Windows loading screen then reboot, above 1120mhz it'll not even load windows and freeze. But in every case it boots up fine.
The Asus forums are full of users who can't get stability in any way with >=1066mhz ram on X38 boards. A selected few have come to accomplish it however, which leads me to think those were the lucky ones who got the good shipment, like you. The Patriot forums are the same, X38 users can't get their system stable with RAMS over 1066 or not even that.
Maybe that X48 "official" support is something to consider, it might be the fix to the X38 we users are looking for. Even if it's only to make sure it'll run RAMs at >=1066mhz, it's good enough already.
oblivionspell - Have you tried manually setting your RAM voltage to the correct value for the performance setting(s)?
I had to do this on my Asus Crosshair, even though EPP is supposed to take care of it for you. Without manually setting the voltage, I had memory corruption and crashes, but could use the non-EPP mode. With the voltage bumped to the correct 2.1V,
the EPP modes work perfectly.
Great review, very detailed and informative. But I must say that either you were lucky that your X38 P5E3 Deluxe came with a better-than-average chipset or that I wasn't so lucky and got a malfunctioning one.I have an Asus Maximus Formula which is, as you know, the Republic of Gamer's solution for the X38 and recently bought a Patriot Extreme Performance 1150mhz PC2-9600. Whenever I try anything above 1020mhz for the RAM my PC reboots; the higher it is the less time it takes to do it. At 1020mhz it'll only reboot if I run something more demanding like 3dMark06 or any new game, at 1100mhz it'll barely show the Windows loading screen then reboot, above 1120mhz it'll not even load windows and freeze. But in every case it boots up fine.The Asus forums are full of users who can't get stability in any way with >=1066mhz ram on X38 boards. A selected few have come to accomplish it however, which leads me to think those were the lucky ones who got the good shipment, like you. The Patriot forums are the same, X38 users can't get their system stable with RAMS over 1066 or not even that.Maybe that X48 "official" support is something to consider, it might be the fix to the X38 we users are looking for. Even if it's only to make sure it'll run RAMs at >=1066mhz, it's good enough already.
It's just a matter of having the right RAM and using the correct timings and voltage. All X38 and X48 motherboards that support DDR2 memory can run DDR2-1066 speeds with stability, so long as the RAM is set up right in BIOS.
"Inside, users will find a GUI based on the Smart Common Input Method (SCIM) platform."
This is not accurate. SCIM is an "input method" -- a scheme for entering internationalized text. Not sure what the GUI is really based on. GTK2, maybe?
"Inside, users will find a GUI based on the Smart Common Input Method (SCIM) platform."
This is not accurate. SCIM is an "input method" -- a scheme for entering internationalized text. Not sure what the GUI is really based on. GTK2, maybe?
I see your point, but that's the same arguement as "Windows 98SE is a GUI based on DOS". Which is innacurate only in wording. It would be better to say "Windows 98SE is a GUI for DOS".
So, you'd be happier to read "Users will find a GUI for the Smart Common Input Method (SCIM) platform" correct?
It's not only the wording. SCIM is not an operating system, so even your example is not analogous (won't even mention that DOS and Windows are separate operating systems with distinct kernels, etc).
This statement is as correct as saying Vista has a GUI based on a 105-key keyboard.
SCIM is an input method platform independent on the GUI. GTK GUI is an widget toolkit, independent on SCIM (although they *may* used each other). Neither is "based" on the other.
If you want to emphasize that the Express Gate supports users of many different languages and nationalities you can mention that the GUI USES SCIM.