X48 Motherboard Comparison

Gigabyte GA-X48-DQ6

Gigabyte's choice of DDR2 for its X48-DQ6 certainly surprised a few industry insiders, as Intel's highest-end chipset targets an upscale "money is no object" market where DDR3 is the expected standard. Intel didn't even bother listing "DDR2" support in its X48 Express function diagram, but the move was easy for Gigabyte, as the new model uses the same circuit board as its top-overclocking X38-DQ6 predecessor.

In fact, every single component other than the MCH is the same, and since the X48 Express is nothing more than an X38 Express with a higher validated stable bus speed, the only difference buyers can hope to see is better overclocking potential. The X48 Express might be a step up from the X38, but it's evident that Gigabyte was comfortable enough in the quality of the earlier components that it didn't see any need for alterations.

There are lots of praiseworthy aspects of the X48-DQ6 layout, such as slot positioning. Gigabyte puts its uppermost PCI Express 2.0 (x16) slot in the second position from the top, to make additional room for the cards beneath, compared to the Asus design. The second x16 slot is three positions below the top x16 slot and three positions above the motherboard's bottom edge, providing ample room for graphics coolers, while leaving extra space for air circulation. Three PCI Express x1 and two PCI slots make up the remainder, with DIMM placement limiting the top x1 slot's card length to 6.75 inches (171 mm).

In order to achieve the better slot layout, Gigabyte placed its DDR2-SDRAM slots closer to the X48-DQ6's top edge compared to the Asus design, which puts the memory a little further off-center from the northbridge. Gigabyte also placed the X48 Express northbridge a little higher to compensate, resulting in the CPU socket being closer to the top edge of the board. While the X48-DQ6 provides ample room for CPU cooler installation, the design eliminated any possibility of surrounding the socket with an extended heatpipe assembly. Thus, a tiny stand-alone sink cools the transistors of the final two CPU voltage regulator "phases".

The only problem we perceive with so many components moved "northward" towards traditional positions is that some oversized CPU coolers will extend past the top edge of the board. Users of "short" mid-tower cases might find that the CPU cooler gets in the way of mounting a power supply. This will probably only affect a small number of users, as traditional 17" tall mid-towers that cram the power supply right next to the motherboard's top edge are no longer popular in the enthusiast market for which the X48-DQ6 is intended.

All eight Serial ATA connectors face outwards from the motherboard's surface for easy cabling, even in cases that have a drive bay immediately adjacent to their front edges. The ports are positioned "three slots" beneath each PCI Express x16 interface, to avoid interfering with long double-slot graphics coolers. Gigabyte finds room where Asus didn't because the GA-X48-DQ6 doesn't have a third graphics card slot, and the two it does have are positioned farther apart.

Both PCI Express x16 slots support PCI Express 2.0 mode, which doubles available bandwidth compared to previous versions.

The Ultra ATA connector faces towards the GA-X48-DQ6's front edge, but clearing the hard drive cage of tight cases shouldn't be a major issue, since appropriate cables always use ninety-degree ends. Easier cable routing to upper-bay-mounted optical drives may have been possible had Gigabyte placed the connector further up the front edge, but the board appears to lack the needed space to round connector traces in that direction. At least the Ultra ATA connector is close to the Gigabyte SATA2 controller that serves it, potentially benefiting the connector with reduced noise.

Gigabyte continues to provide support for antiquated serial and parallel printer ports by placing break-out connectors internally along the X48-DQ6's bottom edge (beneath the lowest PCI slot). Also found here is a header for an optional TPM module and S/P-DIF Input connector. Though the parallel, serial, and S/P-DIF Input options are all presented, Gigabyte leaves it to buyers to find the needed "break-out" cables to use them.

As with the Asus model in this comparison, the GA-X48-DQ6 provides only two internal USB 2.0 connectors (four ports total), which means that anyone with four front panel USB ports will need to search earnestly if they want to find a place to plug in additional USB bay devices. Gigabyte's reasons for this shortage differ from those of Asus, in that the X48-DQ6 provides additional ports to the rear panel, while Asus has simply "used up" its connectors for internal devices. A note to manufacturers: motherboard reviews could be a good place to advertise internal PCI Express 2.0 hubs, if such internal devices exist (though we haven't seen any).

Anyone not using Windows Vista will be pleased to find a floppy connector located near the top of the X38-DQ6's front edge, for easy cabling to the floppy drive required for loading Windows XP RAID or AHCI drivers.

While various manufacturers debate over added features versus better layout, Gigabyte does have one distinct layout advantage which isn't affected by other features: its front-panel audio header is located directly forward of its rear-panel audio jacks. With so many case manufacturers placing front-panel jacks near the top of their towers, this design is a boon to cable management, and could be critical with a few cases that have cables that might otherwise be too short.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Gigabyte GA-X48-DQ6 (Revision 1.1)
NorthbridgeIntel X48 Express MCH
SouthbridgeIntel ICH9R
Voltage RegulatorTwelve Phases
BIOSF6b (1/11/2008)
333.3 MHz (FSB1333)335.0 MHz (+0.5%)
Clock GeneratorICS 9LPRS914EKL
Connectors and Interfaces
Onboard2x PCIe x163x PCIe x12x PCI2x USB 2.0 (2 ports per connector)1x IEEE-1394 FireWire1x Parallel Port header1x Serial Port header1x Floppy1x Ultra ATA (2 drives)8x Serial ATA 3.0Gb/s1x Front Panel Audio1x CD-Audio In1x S/P-DIF In1x S/P-DIF Out2x Fan 4 pins (CPU/System)3x Fan 3 pins (System/Power)
IO panel2x PS2 (keyboard + mouse)2x RJ-45 Network8x USB 2.02x IEEE-1394 FireWire2x Digital Audio Out (S/P-DIF optical + coaxial)6x Analog Audio (7.1 Channel + Mic-In + Line-In)
Mass Storage Controllers
Intel ICH9R6x SATA 3.0Gb/s (RAID 0,1,5,10)
GigaByte SATA2 PCI-E (JMicron)1x Ultra ATA-100 (2-drives)2x SATA 3.0Gb/s (RAID 0,1, JBOD)
Network
2x Realtek RTL8111B PCI-E2x Gigabit LAN Connection
Audio
HDA (Azalia) Controller InterfaceRealtek ALC889A 8 + 2 Channel Codec
FireWire
Texas Instruments TSB43AB233x IEEE-1394a (400 Mbit/s)

Gigabyte's version of the JMicron JMB36x controller series uses a PCI Express x1 interface to deliver up to 250 MB/s of data to and from connected drives, bi-directionally (500 MB/s combined). Likewise, PCI Express provides both Realtek RTL8111B Gigabit Ethernet controllers with 2.5 times the needed bandwidth, and the excessive amount of bandwidth available from PCIe makes us question why companies simply don't use two-port Gigabit controllers on a single PCI Express lane.

Having eight USB 2.0 ports on the back panel is nice, but most users find these difficult to reach once the system has been placed onto or under a desk. An additional internal USB header might have been more useful.

Gigabyte retains both its PS/2 keyboard and mouse ports, knowing that some users still prefer this interface for gaming mice. Other rear panel connectors include optical and coaxial digital audio outputs, full-sized and miniature IEEE-1394 FireWire ports, dual Gigabit ports, and six analog audio jacks.

Gamers who don't use discrete soundcards will note that four of the analog audio jacks are normally required for 7.1 game surround, since most onboard audio codecs don't support real-time signal combining to a single digital stream. Gigabyte went the extra mile here by providing DTS Connect, which requires only a DTS Interactive enabled receiver or integrated speaker system, in addition to a coaxial or optical digital audio cable, to play live multi-channel streams through one of the motherboard's digital outputs.

Rated at 106db signal-to-noise ratio for 7.1 channel analog output, the Realtek ALC889A is actually a 10-channel solution because the front panel audio jacks can be configured separately from the rear channels. This prevents background audio from interfering with the use of headsets.

Thomas Soderstrom
Thomas Soderstrom is a Senior Staff Editor at Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews cases, cooling, memory and motherboards.
  • Help please.Can this board be configured with the first two (SATA) HDs mirrored and the other drives JBOD? Thank you in advance.
    Reply
  • oblivionspell
    Great review, very detailed and informative. But I must say that either you were lucky that your X38 P5E3 Deluxe came with a better-than-average chipset or that I wasn't so lucky and got a malfunctioning one.

    I have an Asus Maximus Formula which is, as you know, the Republic of Gamer's solution for the X38 and recently bought a Patriot Extreme Performance 1150mhz PC2-9600. Whenever I try anything above 1020mhz for the RAM my PC reboots; the higher it is the less time it takes to do it. At 1020mhz it'll only reboot if I run something more demanding like 3dMark06 or any new game, at 1100mhz it'll barely show the Windows loading screen then reboot, above 1120mhz it'll not even load windows and freeze. But in every case it boots up fine.

    The Asus forums are full of users who can't get stability in any way with >=1066mhz ram on X38 boards. A selected few have come to accomplish it however, which leads me to think those were the lucky ones who got the good shipment, like you. The Patriot forums are the same, X38 users can't get their system stable with RAMS over 1066 or not even that.

    Maybe that X48 "official" support is something to consider, it might be the fix to the X38 we users are looking for. Even if it's only to make sure it'll run RAMs at >=1066mhz, it's good enough already.
    Reply
  • oblivionspell - Have you tried manually setting your RAM voltage to the correct value for the performance setting(s)?

    I had to do this on my Asus Crosshair, even though EPP is supposed to take care of it for you. Without manually setting the voltage, I had memory corruption and crashes, but could use the non-EPP mode. With the voltage bumped to the correct 2.1V,
    the EPP modes work perfectly.
    Reply
  • Crashman
    oblivionspellGreat review, very detailed and informative. But I must say that either you were lucky that your X38 P5E3 Deluxe came with a better-than-average chipset or that I wasn't so lucky and got a malfunctioning one.I have an Asus Maximus Formula which is, as you know, the Republic of Gamer's solution for the X38 and recently bought a Patriot Extreme Performance 1150mhz PC2-9600. Whenever I try anything above 1020mhz for the RAM my PC reboots; the higher it is the less time it takes to do it. At 1020mhz it'll only reboot if I run something more demanding like 3dMark06 or any new game, at 1100mhz it'll barely show the Windows loading screen then reboot, above 1120mhz it'll not even load windows and freeze. But in every case it boots up fine.The Asus forums are full of users who can't get stability in any way with >=1066mhz ram on X38 boards. A selected few have come to accomplish it however, which leads me to think those were the lucky ones who got the good shipment, like you. The Patriot forums are the same, X38 users can't get their system stable with RAMS over 1066 or not even that.Maybe that X48 "official" support is something to consider, it might be the fix to the X38 we users are looking for. Even if it's only to make sure it'll run RAMs at >=1066mhz, it's good enough already.
    It's just a matter of having the right RAM and using the correct timings and voltage. All X38 and X48 motherboards that support DDR2 memory can run DDR2-1066 speeds with stability, so long as the RAM is set up right in BIOS.
    Reply
  • "Inside, users will find a GUI based on the Smart Common Input Method (SCIM) platform."

    This is not accurate. SCIM is an "input method" -- a scheme for entering internationalized text. Not sure what the GUI is really based on. GTK2, maybe?
    Reply
  • Crashman
    "Inside, users will find a GUI based on the Smart Common Input Method (SCIM) platform."

    This is not accurate. SCIM is an "input method" -- a scheme for entering internationalized text. Not sure what the GUI is really based on. GTK2, maybe?

    I see your point, but that's the same arguement as "Windows 98SE is a GUI based on DOS". Which is innacurate only in wording. It would be better to say "Windows 98SE is a GUI for DOS".

    So, you'd be happier to read "Users will find a GUI for the Smart Common Input Method (SCIM) platform" correct?
    Reply
  • chill70
    It's not only the wording. SCIM is not an operating system, so even your example is not analogous (won't even mention that DOS and Windows are separate operating systems with distinct kernels, etc).

    This statement is as correct as saying Vista has a GUI based on a 105-key keyboard.

    SCIM is an input method platform independent on the GUI. GTK GUI is an widget toolkit, independent on SCIM (although they *may* used each other). Neither is "based" on the other.

    If you want to emphasize that the Express Gate supports users of many different languages and nationalities you can mention that the GUI USES SCIM.
    Reply