Best offers
|
P7P55D Motherboard (Intel Socket H... | $149.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
M4A785TD-V EVO AMD 785G/SB710 Socket... | $84.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GA-P55-UD4P Motherboard (Intel Socket... | $169.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GA-P55-UD3R Motherboard (Intel Socket... | $139.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
M4A78T-E Motherboard (AMD, AM3, AMD... | $129.99 Newegg.com More info |
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
kids :
Bob
Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
|
Sponsored links
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (37) |
- Share
Features and Layout
Foxconn seems a little perplexed about the name of its latest Quantum Force motherboard, calling it "BLOOD RAGE," "BLOODRAGE," "BloodRage," or "Blood Rage" in various electronic and printed documents. We had to list every variation at least once to make them all “searchable,” but inconsistent naming aside, it’s a really striking product.
Extreme overclockers are the target market for the Blood Rage, as with previous Quantum Force products, and the highest-speed memory configurations will always use the minimum number of modules required to fill all channels. The lack of a second set of memory slots is forgivable in keeping with the Quantum Force overclocking theme, but users who want more than 6 GB of RAM must wait for 4.0 GB module availability.
Another thing that makes the Blood Rage unique is its ability to hold LGA-775-style coolers. The addition of legacy mounting holes makes sense when one considers the scant availability of LGA-1366-compatible water blocks during the first few months of Core i7's existence, and continues to allow extreme overclockers to use their earlier-design liquid-nitrogen cooling pots.
An additional feature that separates the Blood Rage from other products in today’s comparison is its support for 4-way CrossFireX (QuadFire) configurations using single-slot graphics cards. Four-GPU configurations using dual-GPU products, such as two Radeon HD 4870 X2 or GeForce GTX 295 units are also favored with an empty slot between cards assisting cooling. However, 3-way SLI users will be disappointed because placing double-slot graphics cards in the red slots will block access to the black slots. Foxconn could have made such 3-way configurations possible by swapping positions between the uppermost x16 slot and the x1 slot above it, but its engineers had other plans.
Cable placement is mediocre, with the eight-pin EPS12V connector exactly where it should be but the floppy header inconveniently stuffed under the bottom PCIe 2.0 slot. Windows XP still requires a floppy for adding AHCI or RAID drivers during its installation and many gamers still favor the established operating system. A few extreme overclockers still prefer Ultra ATA to SATA, so our normal suggestion to remove this interface and put the floppy connector in its place might be condemned by the Quantum Force target market.
All six of the ICH10R southbridge SATA connections face forward, requiring additional clearance between the motherboard’s leading edge and any nearby drive bays. Beneath these are power and reset buttons, while two outward-facing ports to the left use Marvelle’s PCIe-based SAS controller.
| Foxconn Blood Rage (Initial Revision) | |
|---|---|
| Northbridge | Intel X58 Express |
| Southbridge | Intel ICH10R |
| Voltage Regulation | Fourteen Phase Digital/Analog Hybrid |
| BIOS | G13 (12/12/2008) |
| 133.3 MHz Base Clock | 133.0 (-0.25%) |
| Clock Generator | ICS 9LPRS139AKLF |
Connectors and Interfaces | |
| Onboard | 3 x PCIe 2.0 x16 (Pathways Shared in Pairs) |
1 x PCIe x4 | |
1 x PCI | |
1 x Sonar X-Fi Audio Riser (Proprietary) | |
2 x USB 2.0 (2 ports per connector). | |
1 x IEEE-1394 FireWire | |
1 x Floppy | |
1 x Ultra ATA (2 drives) | |
8 x SATA 3.0 Gb/s | |
1 x Fan 4-pin (CPU) | |
4 x Fan 3-pins (Chassis, Power) | |
1 x Power button | |
1 x Reset button | |
1 x Force Reset button | |
| I/O Panel | 1 x PS2 (keyboard) |
8 x USB 2.0 | |
1 x CLR-CMOS button | |
1 x Digital Audio Out (Coaxial) | |
1 x IEEE-1394 FireWire | |
2 x RJ45 Ethernet | |
2 x External SATA (eSATA) 3.0Gb/s | |
Mass Storage Controllers | |
| Intel ICH10R | 6x SATA 3.0 Gb/s (RAID 0, 1, 5, 10) |
| JMicron JMB363 PCIe | 1x Ultra ATA-133 (2-drives) |
2x External SATA (eSATA) 3.0 Gb/s | |
| Intel ICH10R | 2x SAS 3.0 Gb/s (RAID 0, 1) |
Network | |
| 2 x Realtek RTL8111C PCIe | Dual Gigabit LAN with Teaming |
Audio | |
| Foxconn Sonar X-Fi Riser (Realtek ALC889 HD Codec) | Eight-Channel (7.1 Surround) Output |
| IEEE 1394 FireWire | |
| TI TSB43AB22A | 2x FireWire 400 (1x Internal, 1x I/O Panel) |
While a single PCI Express x1 pathway is somewhat limiting for the four drives supported by the JMB363 Ultra ATA and dual eSATA ports, two pathways for the dual Realtek RTL8111C Gigabit Ethernet controllers are more than adequate.
With only two 400 Mb, the TSB43AB22A IEEE-1394 Firewire controller needs nothing more than a legacy PCI interface for optimal performance.
A license with Creative Labs allows Foxconn’s Realtek ALC889-based codec card to support additional features, including EAX Advanced HD 4.0, with software.
- Will i7 (x58) motherboards be able to have futre cpu's? [Homebuilt Systems]
- Core i7 X58 or a Core i7 P55? [CPU & Components]
- Asus x48 or x58 [Motherboards & Memory]
- My shopping list for a non gamer- any thoughts? (i7 860) [Homebuilt Systems]
- I7 920 Build Freezing Randomly All The Time [CPU & Components]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
- 1 / 2
- Next
-
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- How much RAM is optimal for an i7 920
- AMD Phenom II 940 "Xtremely" Benchmarked
- P6T Deluxe - 24-pin EATXPWR or 8-pin EATX12V or Both
- Can i do SLI with this?
- Building New Tower Please HELP!
- E8400 @ 4ghz on Asus P5Q Pro, need help with voltages
- Help with my almost final specs
- Considering buying this overclocked Core I7
- X58 motherboard for x-fire 4870's 1gb
- OC'ing phenom II 940 BE
- Help! Bought Asus P6t6 WS vs P6t Deluxe - does a WS motherboard work?
- Tpower x58 biostar motherboard question
- Installing waterblocks on DFI Lanparty
- Which is a better MOBO for the x58














Some times it really hard to stay objective, but you did it, grate article.
I would consider few other aspects as well, like service and RMA statistics.
In some countries you wont have official representation of a vendor, and in case of RMA you can end up with different MB model, usually not for the best.
From my experience i recommend for most of you to get more common boards.
"Intel X58 Roundup: Six $300+ Platforms Compared " this title will lead
some less informed readers that they can get the cpu memory and MB for 300.00.
It should read "Intel X58 Roundup: Six $300+ Motherboards Compared"
the title is misleading
I can't afford an i7 system, but when I see beautiful motherboards like that dfi and the foxconn board, I wish I could! That foxconn board almost makes me feel like looking at a beautifully built soltek board with uniform colors and good looks. Looks ain't everything, but looks do matter. I love my gigabyte board because it works great, but I would love it even more if it came 'styled' like the dfi green or the foxconn red board ....
When you review the less-expensive X58 boards, I'd appreciate it if you would evaluate them in terms of which is the likely to be the most stable, most reliable, and most problem-free non-overclocked board. Thanks.
Lol nice article, lol i love the soldering job on the port-80 diagnostics digits for the DFI lan party board.
It seems odd to have skipped mentioning the Gigabyte EX58's driver-less RAID capability. I was able to get Windows XP to boot off of a mirrored RAID without needing the floppy and the initial setup went very quickly. One unfortunate aspect of this mobo, however is that it cannot output digital audio and analog audio at the same time. So no switching between surround sound and headphones without changing settings in the audio control software.
Though the core i7 is a crazy fast processor, it doesn't offer ECC support. That is why I just bought an amd phenom II 940. Perhaps 'gamers' don't care about ECC but only how many graphics cards they can stuff in the mb. On the other hand, IBM estimated 1 error per gig per week. So at 4gb, that is less than 2 days between errors. Perhaps that isn't noticeable with microsoft operation systems, but I keep my machines up for weeks or months at a time...
My cheap asus mb not only supports ECC, but ECC scrubbing, chipkill, and more. Who cares how fast a computer is, when it crashes often?
Though the core i7 is a crazy fast processor, it doesn't offer ECC support. That is why I just bought an amd phenom II 940. Perhaps 'gamers' don't care about ECC but only how many graphics cards they can stuff in the mb. On the other hand, IBM estimated 1 error per gig per week. So at 4gb, that is less than 2 days between errors. Perhaps that isn't noticeable with microsoft operation systems, but I keep my machines up for weeks or months at a time...
My cheap asus mb not only supports ECC, but ECC scrubbing, chipkill, and more. Who cares how fast a computer is, when it crashes often?
"Intel X58 Roundup: Six $300+ Platforms Compared " this title will lead some less informed readers that they can get the cpu memory and MB for 300.00.It should read "Intel X58 Roundup: Six $300+ Motherboards Compared"the title is misleading
You're right: I belive the word "Platform" was substituted by another editor to make the title shorter, so it would fit better in the headline bar. I might have chosen "Mobos" myself when encountered with such an issue, but they don't like using slang in titles.
When you review the less-expensive X58 boards, I'd appreciate it if you would evaluate them in terms of which is the likely to be the most stable, most reliable, and most problem-free non-overclocked board. Thanks.
Good suggestions, but the problem is that all these boards were stable and built for reliability when overclocked. Using lower speeds increases stability and reliability, and you just cannot exceed "100% Stability". All the boards also used high-quality electrical components, which means a reliability test would require years to reveal any differences.
It seems odd to have skipped mentioning the Gigabyte EX58's driver-less RAID capability. I was able to get Windows XP to boot off of a mirrored RAID without needing the floppy and the initial setup went very quickly. One unfortunate aspect of this mobo, however is that it cannot output digital audio and analog audio at the same time. So no switching between surround sound and headphones without changing settings in the audio control software.
We'll have to see what we can do about getting the author some digital speakers or a digital receiver headset to test for such issues in the future. That particular issue hadn't come up prior to testing.
What about the Gigabyte UD5? I guess it doesn't fall in the 300+ category at $288 from Newegg, but stil...
It has all the benefits of the EX-58-Extreme minus the gigantic NB cooler, but also allows use of an x8 RAID card in the open ended slot (I have one installed) and if you get straight risers/wearout protectors you can install a x1 sound card in the top slot! The best of all worlds!!!
The only small complaint I have is that sometimes I have to try to boot twice since the AHCI bios doesn't always want to load after post.
I got as far as reading that XP was an outdated operating system before I decided I didn't want to hear what this guy has to say.
I got as far as reading that XP was an outdated operating system before I decided I didn't want to hear what this guy has to say.
LOL, it's a bit of SARCASM the represents what the MANUFACTURERS think of the market. If it weren't sarcasm, floppy connector placement wouldn't have been examined on every...single...board...repetitiously.
nice roundup
if only i wasnt broke lol
Though the core i7 is a crazy fast processor, it doesn't offer ECC support. That is why I just bought an amd phenom II 940. Perhaps 'gamers' don't care about ECC but only how many graphics cards they can stuff in the mb. On the other hand, IBM estimated 1 error per gig per week. So at 4gb, that is less than 2 days between errors. Perhaps that isn't noticeable with microsoft operation systems, but I keep my machines up for weeks or months at a time... My cheap asus mb not only supports ECC, but ECC scrubbing, chipkill, and more. Who cares how fast a computer is, when it crashes often?
I dunno about most people, but I have kept my Intel Based non ECC computer running for over a month with no problems. The reason I reboot my computer though has nothing to do with errors from random photons and deepspace radiation, it is because there are still companies who do not code very well and have memory leaks. Either way, I still do not have to reboot all that often, and the only time I crash and burn is when I overclock too high and the house temperature goes up enough to set off a system crash. Not exactly things I can complain about, and certainly not something that is due to the lack of ECC ram.
I am probably going to wait until Intel comes out with it's 6 or 8 core products though before I splurge for my next computer upgrade. My Q6600 is doing just fine at 3GHz at crunching the numbers for the games I am playing today, and likely for the rest of this year. Next year though, I might be in line for a nice upgrade.
As for outdated XP, that is what my computer runs on today, I cannot stand Vista, and Windows 7 did not find any greater love from me either. Intel may win my money, but so far Microsoft keeps punting the ball when it comes to making something that is actually an upgrade from XP. We old men change hard!!!!
I got as far as reading that XP was an outdated operating system before I decided I didn't want to hear what this guy has to say.
But it is.
Anyways, good article. This was exactly what I was looking for, as I'm about to build an i7 system.
So you're saying none of the earlier driver problems are still present that have been mentioned in numereos consumer reviews, or other sites? If so great news, because it's why I've been holding off my purchase.
So you're saying none of the earlier driver problems are still present that have been mentioned in numereos consumer reviews, or other sites? If so great news, because it's why I've been holding off my purchase.
No driver issues with the software that was tested.
Great that puts my mind at ease, Thanks for the nice article.
LOL, it's a bit of SARCASM the represents what the MANUFACTURERS think of the market. If it weren't sarcasm, floppy connector placement wouldn't have been examined on every...single...board...repetitiously.
Only reason I have a on floppy in all my machine I needed install XP on.
Great article. Thanks!