Six $200-$260 LGA 2011 Motherboards, Reviewed
Table of contents
- 1. Can LGA 2011 Be Made More Affordable?
- 2. ASRock X79 Extreme4
- 3. X79 Extreme4 Firmware
- 4. Asus P9X79
- 5. P9X79 Firmware
- 6. Biostar TPower X79
- 7. TPower X79 Firmware
- 8. ECS X79R-AX Black Deluxe
- 9. X79R-AX Deluxe Firmware
- 10. Intel DX79TO
- 11. DX79TO Firmware
- 12. MSI X79A-GD45 (8D)
- 13. X79A-GD45 (8D) Firmware
- 14. Test Settings And Benchmarks
- 15. Benchmark Results: DiRT 3
- 16. Benchmark Results: Metro 2033
- 17. Benchmark Results: StarCraft II
- 18. Benchmark Results: Audio And Video Encoding
- 19. Benchmark Results: Productivity
- 20. Power, Heat, And Efficiency
- 21. Overclocking
- 22. Which X79-Based Motherboard Offers More Value?
We know that Intel's X79 Express platform hosts the fastest desktop processors in the company's portfolio. But can it be made more affordable? We round up the least-expensive $200-$260 motherboards to determine how much you have to give up for cheap X79.
Motherboard designers can approach cost-cutting from several different angles. They can selectively lop off certain features or change their layouts, facilitating fewer PCB layers. They can pare back value-added bundles or even offer mail-in rebates that a majority of folks never take the time to redeem. We've seen these approaches work really well on mainstream platforms, and we're sometimes surprised to find exceptional reliability persisting, despite the need to shave off precious dollars and cents. But Intel's LGA 2011 interface is a different animal entirely. Its four memory channels feed a complex processor, which attaches to a more expensive PCH. Together, that all results in a higher starting price for Core i7-3000-compatible motherboards.
And then you have to take the cost of Intel's processors into account. Even the lowest-end Core i7-3820 is expected to sell for close to $300, and that's a quad-core mode. Consequently, we can't expect too many enthusiasts to tolerate a cut-down, incomplete motherboard to complement any Sandy Bridge-E-based chip.
Pricing and quality expectations come to a head in the sub-$260 LGA 2011 market, where some buyers will certainly wonder why an entry-level board still costs $100 more than LGA 1155-based platforms with seemingly similar on-board extras. Quite simply, the costs associated with Sandy Bridge-E are higher, in part because of Intel's prices and also because the boards are more difficult to design.

| X79 Motherboard Features | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ASRock X79 Extreme4 | Asus P9X79 | Biostar TPower X79 | |
| PCB Revision | 1.03 | 1.01 | 5.0 |
| Chipset | Intel X79 Express | Intel X79 Express | Intel X79 Express |
| Voltage Regulator | Eight Phases | 10 Phases | Six Phases |
| BIOS | P1.70 (02/02/2012) | 0906 (12/22/2011) | X79AE118 (01/18/2012) |
| 100.0 MHz BCLK | 100.0 MHz (+0.00%) | 100.1 MHz (+0.10%) | 100.0 MHz (+0.00%) |
| Internal Interfaces | |||
| PCIe 3.0 x16 | 3 (x16/x16/x8) | 3 (x16/x16/x8) | 3 (x16/x16/x8) |
| PCIe 2.0 x16 | None | None | None |
| PCIe x1/x4 | 2/0 | 2/0 | 2/0 |
| Legacy PCI | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| USB 2.0 | 3 (6-ports) | 4 (8-ports) | 2 (4-ports) |
| USB 3.0 | 1 (2-ports) | None | 1 (2-ports) |
| IEEE-1394 | 1 | None | None |
| Serial Port | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Parallel Port | None | None | None |
| SATA 6.0 Gb/s | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| SATA 3.0 Gb/s | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| 4-Pin Fan | 2 | 6 | 1 |
| 3-Pin Fan | 4 | None | 2 |
| FP-Audio | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| S/PDIF I/O | Output Only | Output Only | Output Only |
| Power Button | Yes | No | Yes |
| Reset Button | Yes | No | Yes |
| CLR_CMOS Button | No | No | Yes |
| Diagnostics Panel | Numeric | Pass/Fail LED | Numeric |
| I/O Panel Connectors | |||
| P/S 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| USB 3.0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| USB 2.0 | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| IEEE-1394 | 1 | 1 | None |
| Network | Single | Single | Single |
| eSATA | 1 | 2 (1-Powered) | 1 (Powered) |
| CLR_CMOS Button | Yes | Yes | No |
| Digital Audio Out | Optical + Coaxial | Optical | Optical + Coaxial |
| Digital Audio In | None | None | None |
| Analog Audio | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Other Devices | None | None | None |
| Mass Storage Controllers | |||
| Chipset SATA | 2 x SATA 6Gb/s 4 x SATA 3Gb/s | 2 x SATA 6Gb/s 4 x SATA 3Gb/s | 2 x SATA 6Gb/s 4 x SATA 3Gb/s |
| Chipset RAID Modes | 0, 1, 5, 10 | 0, 1, 5, 10 | 0, 1, 5, 10 |
| Add-In SATA | 2 x ASM1061 PCIe 3 x SATA 6Gb/s 1 x eSATA 6Gb/s | ASM1061 PCIe 2 x eSATA 6Gb/s | ASM1061 PCIe 1 x SATA 6Gb/s 1 x eSATA 6Gb/s |
| USB 3.0 | 2 x ASM1042 PCIe | 2 x ASM1042 PCIe | 4 x ASM1042 PCIe |
| IEEE-1394 | VT6315N PCIe 2 x 400 Mb/s | VT6315N PCIe | None |
| Gigabit Ethernet | |||
| Primary LAN | BCM57781 PCIe | WG82579V PHY | RTL8111E PCIe |
| Secondary LAN | None | None | None |
| Audio | |||
| HD Audio Codec | ALC898 | ALC892 | ALC898 |
| DDL/DTS Connect | Not Specified | DTS Connect | Not Specified |
.

| X79 Motherboard Features | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ECS X79R-AX Black Deluxe | Intel DX79TO | MSI X79A- GD45 8D | |
| PCB Revision | 1.0 | 1 | 2.0 |
| Chipset | Intel X79 Express | Intel X79 Express | Intel X79 Express |
| Voltage Regulator | Seven Phases | Six Phases | Eight Phases |
| BIOS | 79D1B29A (11/29/2011) | SI0424P (01/27/2012) | V10.2 (01/31/2011) |
| 100.0 MHz BCLK | 100.0 MHz (+0.00%) | 100.0 MHz (+0.00%) | 100.0 MHz (+0.00%) |
| Internal Interfaces | |||
| PCIe 3.0 x16 | 4 (x16/x0/x16/x0 or x8/x8/x8/x8) | 2 (x16/x16) | 3 (x16/x16/x8) |
| PCIe 2.0 x16 | None | None | 2 (x1/x1) |
| PCIe x1/x4 | 2/0 | 3/0 | 1/0 |
| Legacy PCI | None | 1 | None |
| USB 2.0 | 2 (4-ports) | 4 (8-ports) | 2 (4-ports) |
| USB 3.0 | 1 (2-ports) | None | 1 (2-ports) |
| IEEE-1394 | None | 1 | None |
| Serial Port | 1 | None | 1 |
| Parallel Port | None | None | None |
| SATA 6.0 Gb/s | 6 | 2 | 2 |
| SATA 3.0 Gb/s | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| 4-Pin Fan | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| 3-Pin Fan | 3 | None | None |
| FP-Audio | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| S/PDIF I/O | Output Only | None | None |
| Power Button | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reset Button | No | Yes | No |
| CLR_CMOS Button | No | No | No |
| Diagnostics Panel | None | Numeric | None |
| I/O Panel Connectors | |||
| P/S 2 | 1 | None | 2 |
| USB 3.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
| USB 2.0 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| IEEE-1394 | None | 1 | None |
| Network | Single | Single | Single |
| eSATA | None | None | None |
| CLR_CMOS Button | No | Back to BIOS | Yes |
| Digital Audio Out | Optical | None | Optical + Coaxial |
| Digital Audio In | None | None | None |
| Analog Audio | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| Other Devices | None | None | None |
| Mass Storage Controllers | |||
| Chipset SATA | 2 x SATA 6Gb/s 4 x SATA 3Gb/s 4 x SAS 6Gb/s | 2 x SATA 6Gb/s 4 x SATA 3Gb/s | 2 x SATA 6Gb/s 4 x SATA 3Gb/s |
| Chipset RAID Modes | 0, 1, 5, 10 | 0, 1, 5, 10 | 0, 1, 5, 10 |
| Add-In SATA | None | None | None |
| USB 3.0 | TUSB7340 PCIe TUSB7320 PCIe | D720200F1 PCIe | 2 x D720200F1 PCIe |
| IEEE-1394 | None | VT6315N PCIe | None |
| Gigabit Ethernet | |||
| Primary LAN | RTL8111E PCIe | WG82579LM PHY | WG82579V PHY |
| Secondary LAN | None | None | None |
| Audio | |||
| HD Audio Codec | ALC892 | ALC892 | ALC892 |
| DDL/DTS Connect | Not Specified | Not Specified | Not Specified |
Feature tables tell a lot about what each motherboard offers. But design and implementation make some features more valuable than others. We’re now ready to examine and detail the design, performance, and overclocking capabilities of these six not-quite-economical products.
Before we move on to the next page, though, we want to point out that, finally, all six of these vendors are on-board with similar three-year warranties, satisfying our former criticisms about a lack of value in the form of support.
- 1 / 2
- Next
-
Latest Motherboards News
- 05/25 – Thunderbolt Will Become Key Motherboard Spec in 2H 2012
- 05/22 – Does Your AMD FX Platform BSOD with Steam? Read This.
- 05/04 – 54 Million Enthusiast and Performance PC Gamers Globally
- 05/01 – Intel's Next Unit of Computing Rivals Raspberry Pi in Size
- 04/10 – Intel P67 Express Chipset Begins Product Discontinuance Cycle
Latest Motherboards reviews
- 04/30 – Six $160-220 Z77 Motherboards, Benchmarked And Reviewed
- 04/23 – Video Teaser: Intel's DZ77GA-70K Motherboard
- 04/17 – Overclocking: Asus Rampage IV Extreme Versus EVGA X79 FTW
- 04/08 – Intel’s Z77 Express And Lucidlogix MVP: New Features...
- 02/27 – Six $200-$260 LGA 2011 Motherboards, Reviewed
-
Latest Intel News
- Intel Picks UK for Research Institute on Sustainable Cities
- Specs for Dell's Windows 8 Clover Trail Tablet Leaked
- Thunderbolt Will Become Key Motherboard Spec in 2H 2012
- AMD Backing Out of CPU Speed Wars Against Intel
- Intel Hopes New Batteries Can Reduce Ultrabook Cost
-
Latest Intel reviews
- Overclocking Core i7-3770K: Learning To Live With Compromise
- Core i5-3570K, -3550, -3550S, And -3570T: Ivy Bridge Efficiency
- Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: May 2012
- Intel SSD 330 Review: 60, 120, And 180 GB Models Benchmarked
- Core i7-3720QM: Ivy Bridge Makes Its Mark On Mobility

I like Asrock boards. I have an 880GM-LE mATX and a Z68 Pro3 Gen3 ATX and both are good performance and price-performance wise.
Asrock is dominating both high end and mid range market.extreme3/gen3 1155 is awesome and cheapest pci-e 3.0 sli capable mobo.Asrock FTW!!!
Since the boards all have vastly superior profit margins, your statement is misleading. Why is everyone too afraid to reveal the truth about motherboard pricing?
ASRock has come a long way!
Would it be possible, in future motherboard reviews, to include a measure of the cold boot (POST) time? This is something that different bioses can be differentiated on, and UFEI offers the potential for very fast boots if manufacturers take advantage of it properly.
A comparison of the time between the power button being pressed and the installed bootloader starting would be very interesting to me. I was thinking it might be easiest to measure this by having no OS on the boot media and measuring the time to the "please insert boot media" message, but I'm sure you can think of other ways of doing it.
I'm also informed that on some boards the boot time varies dramatically dependent on whether any Overclocking is enabled, as compared to the stock settings - that would also be worth knowing.
your feature table says the asrock extreme 4 comes with an 8 phase voltage regulator, but the text of article says 10 phase...which is it ?
ASRock = ASUS
ASRock = ASUS
not anymore, asrock is no longer affiliated with Asus and is owned by Pegatron Corp.
I wish tom's would do a "best motherboards for the money" or something close to that.
Pegatron sounds like a merger between PegASUS + Megatron (or something like that).
I'd like to see one of these x79 motherboards mounted in a case with a rear mounted 120MM radiator. I'm concerned that the memory slots might be blocked by a thick radiator + 120MM fan inside the case.
Great informative article.
But I'm wondering why AMD continues the ATI brand on the ASrock motherboard? Seems odd. They had everyone replace the CCC as soon as they rebranded and here we are looking at the ATI logo on the ASrock board.
Also, even though there is so little difference when comparing boards using the same architecture, why no BF3 in the gaming section of the review? I thought this was one of the games mentioned in the 2012 goals for Tom's when reviewing gaming performance?
I'm looking forward to the review of several z77 motherboards. The x79's are far too expensive.
i realy dont see a reason why i should go for a X79 from my X58 board. even with the next gen vga for AMD is out that say PCI 3.0 compatible, (assume same for the nvidia as well) i can put those cards on my board. so thats leave the quad channel and the more efficien i7 gen 2 cpu's. still will i see a huge FPS gain in games. i dont think so. so i think i can safely leave out this whole year without upgrading my mobo. in fact since i have a i7 950 im actually wating it to go down in the CPU hirearchy one more level.
your feature table says the asrock extreme 4 comes with an 8 phase voltage regulator, but the text of article says 10 phase...which is it ?
Eight, thanks
Great informative article. But I'm wondering why AMD continues the ATI brand on the ASrock motherboard? Seems odd. They had everyone replace the CCC as soon as they rebranded and here we are looking at the ATI logo on the ASrock board.Also, even though there is so little difference when comparing boards using the same architecture, why no BF3 in the gaming section of the review? I thought this was one of the games mentioned in the 2012 goals for Tom's when reviewing gaming performance?
New benchmarks are considered when a new chipset is launched. Keeping the old benchmark means you can compare current results with former results of previous roundups.
I like this review. It's good to see that most of the motherboards perform about the same with nobody sticking out or lagging behind for the most part. There's such a wide variety of prices for the LGA 2011 platform that I certainly didn't want to wind up with an overpriced POS.
I settled on the ASRock Extreme4-m. I did have to wait for a new BIOS chip to arrive in order to make use of it though. They overnighted one to me last week and I got my system up and running over the weekend. So far so good. I've been quite happy with it now that it's working. I can't say that I've tried the overclocking features.
I'd like to see one of these x79 motherboards mounted in a case with a rear mounted 120MM radiator. I'm concerned that the memory slots might be blocked by a thick radiator + 120MM fan inside the case.
With the ASRock Extreme4-m the memory slots and CPU 8-pin power connectors are very close to the radiator. I went with the Intel liquid cooler for my build. It's a 120mm fan and radiator. I placed these in a Silverstone FT03 as exhaust from the top of the case. It's important to pick out RAM that doesn't have any crazy fins or spikes on it. I went with some Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 4x4GB that were on the official support list. There is a 4 to 5 mm gap between the RAM and radiator. it is plenty of room for the 8-pin wires to clear without touching the RAM or radiator. It's tight, but it works. I originally was going to buy GSkill RAM that was $20 cheaper, but there's no way the big red fins on those sticks would have fit.
I really wish Tom's Hardware would do more reviews of mid-range components. Especially with Ivy Bridge being compatible with Socket 1155, why wouldn't they do a review on some good z68 boards out now that will do well with Ivy Bridge, if you're looking to get a cheap rig now (G630/G860) and then upgrade later. All this 2011 stuff though are there really that many people that spend $600+ on a CPU?
Also, even though there is so little difference when comparing boards using the same architecture, why no BF3 in the gaming section of the review? I thought this was one of the games mentioned in the 2012 goals for Tom's when reviewing gaming performance?
I don't blame them for skipping BF3. Since the most recent video drivers I've been having all sorts of issues with BF3. It's the only game on my machine to display a "Something went wrong" error and crash the entire system. I'd imagine it's hard to benchmark such an unstable game. My Extreme4-m, i7 3820, and Radeon 7950 system has no trouble with Just Cause 2, GTA IV, Crysis, and others, but BF3 has this remarkable capability to come up with the most ridiculous of error messages and strange behavior. That game still has issues.
I really wish Tom's Hardware would do more reviews of mid-range components. Especially with Ivy Bridge being compatible with Socket 1155, why wouldn't they do a review on some good z68 boards out now that will do well with Ivy Bridge, if you're looking to get a cheap rig now (G630/G860) and then upgrade later. All this 2011 stuff though are there really that many people that spend $600+ on a CPU?
Z68 has been covered fairly well, and Z77 will be next. Manufacturers will provide the information on Ivy Bridge compatibility for their Z68 motherboards.
asrock look fast....