| BIOS Frequency and Voltage settings (for overclocking) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASRock Z87 OC Formula | Asus Maximus VI Formula | Gigabyte Z87X-UD5H | MSI Z87 MPower Max | |
| Base Clock | 90-300 MHz (0.1 MHz) | 60-300 MHz (0.1 MHz) | 80-267 MHz (0.01 MHz) | 90-300 MHz (0.06 MHz) |
| CPU Multiplier | 8.0-120x (1x) | 8.0-80x (1x) | 8-80x (1x) | 8-80x (1x) |
| DRAM Data Rates | 800-4000 (200/266.6 MHz) | 800-3200 (200/266.6 MHz) | 800-2933 (200/266.6 MHz) | 800-3200 (200/266.6 MHz) |
| CPU Vcore | 0.80-2.00V (1 mV) | 0.001-1.92V (1 mV) | 0.50-1.80V (1 mV) | 0.80-2.10V (1 mV) |
| VCCIN | 1.20-2.30v (10 mV) | 0.80-2.44V (10 mV) | 1.00-2.91V (10 mV) | 1.20-3.04V (1 mV) |
| PCH Voltage | 0.97-1.32 V (5 mV) | 0.70-1.80 V (6.25 mV) | 0.65-1.30 V (5 mV) | 0.70-1.68 V (10 mV) |
| DRAM Voltage | 1.05-2.40 V (6.5 mV) | 1.20-2.40 V (5 mV) | 1.15-2.10 V (5 mV) | 0.30-2.45 V (15 mV) |
| CAS Latency | 4-15 Cycles | 1-31 Cycles | 5-15 Cycles | 4-15 Cycles |
| tRCD | 3-31 Cycles | 1-31 Cycles | 4-31 Cycles | 4-31 Cycles |
| tRP | 4-31 Cycles | 1-31 Cycles | 4-31 Cycles | 4-31 Cycles |
| tRAS | 9-63 Cycles | 1-63 Cycles | 5-63 Cycles | 9-63 Cycles |
We see base clock frequency adjustments up to 300 MHz for some motherboards, but know that most Haswell-based processors are limited to less than 10% over-stock. That would be 110 MHz when using a 100 MHz strap, or 183 MHz when using a 166.7 MHz strap.

We couldn’t get any of the motherboards in this review to give us exactly 1.25 V, and anything above 1.27 V caused our CPU to overheat. ASRock got closest to 1.27 V, so that possibly helps explain its 10 MHz lead. MSI had the least over-voltage of the group, but the difference of a few millivolts probably shouldn’t be attributable for this much of an overclocking deficit.

With the CPU's voltage increased and multiplier reduced, ASRock returns the highest base clock. Asus also offers special BCLK overclocking profiles for unlocked CPUs, but our real concern is how far the 100 MHz strap might push a locked CPU.

Gigabyte takes a fairly big dip in DRAM overclocking, though our recent test showed that data rates beyond DDR3-2133 aren’t particularly useful anyway, even if you're using integrated graphics. Then again, neither is BCLK overclocking when the only CPU models that support boot strap changes are already multiplier-unlocked. ASRock’s lead and/or tie across all three disciplines is noteworthy in that the Z87 OC Formula had no stability deficits.
- Four Z87 Express Motherboards Under $300, Reviewed
- ASRock Z87 OC Formula
- Z87 OC Formula Special Features
- Z87 OC Formula Software
- Z87 OC Formula Firmware
- Asus Maximus VI Formula
- Maximus VI Formula Special Features
- Maximus VI Formula Software
- Maximus VI Formula Firmware
- Gigabyte Z87X-UD5H
- Z87X-UD5H Software
- Z87X-UD5H Firmware
- MSI Z87 MPower Max
- Z87 MPower Max Special Features
- Z87 MPower Max Firmware
- Test Settings And Benchmarks
- Results: Synthetic Benchmarks
- Results: Audio And Video Encoding
- Results: Adobe Creative Suite
- Results: Productivity
- Results: File Compression
- Power, Heat, And Efficiency
- Overclocking
- Picking The Best Z87 Motherboard Under $300
Always favoring Asus, ASRock and Gigabyte ~
No matter how less differences between each board ~
MSI Motherboard , the reviewer never have comment ~
I am a MSI brand fans , I admitted it , but the reviewer seems like ignored MSI's afford.
Always favoring Asus, ASRock and Gigabyte ~
No matter how less differences between each board ~
MSI Motherboard , the reviewer never have comment ~
I am a MSI brand fans , I admitted it , but the reviewer seems like ignored MSI's afford.
Always favoring Asus, ASRock and Gigabyte ~
No matter how less differences between each board ~
MSI Motherboard , the reviewer never have comment ~
I am a MSI brand fans , I admitted it , but the reviewer seems like ignored MSI's afford.
After working in retail for a while you tend to see trends with motherboard manufactures. From what I have seen, Asus tends to have the overall most stable quality with the least amount of issues and very decent support for BIOS updates for newer CPU support beyond most.
ASRock has upped their game in recent years and has put more quality into their boards but they also have a lot of features much like Asus since they were once a part of ASUSTek and separated although Asus did put in a bid to buy them back but I haven't seen any word from them.
Gigabyte is a hit or miss. Their high end seems very good but their low end sometimes lacks.
Then there is MSI. I am not a fan of MSI. The TwinFRZR branded GPUs had a lot of issues, mainly the fans going out very fast. But I think there are two components that kill them for me the most. One was the massive heat issues their X58 boards had with the chipsets on a large number of their boards. We had a X58m from MSI that was idling at 58-60c for the chipset in BIOS doing nothing and we RMAed it. Came back with the same problem. Due to this heat most of the MSI X58 builds we did would lose SATA and come back sometimes on reboot. Had one customers machine that we went from a ATX X58 to a X58M and finally swapped them to an Asus which the chipset idled around 35c which is normal.
The second for me was the BIOS updates on a lot of their boards. Now I can't say on their high end but recently MSI stopped allowing you to update through the BIOS and instead only offered a Windows based app to update and that is just bad. If you bought a MSI with a CPU and it didn't support it, rather then being able to drop an older CPU in and flash it, you have to do an entire build including Windows installation to do it which is a waste of time. USB via BIOS is the best method and now Asus even has the ability to do it sans CPU so if you bought a CPU that needs a BIOS update, no biggie.
That's what I see of the brands. I tend to stick to Asus as they have always worked for me but I have experienced a lot and the article is fine. Its looks at the important features, as the majority of the software is not needed anyways and just bloat, and grades it from that.
What I want to know is why a ROG Asus board has RealTek sound instead of Asus own sound. RealTek is fine for those who don't care but for real sound Asus/Creative offer way better solutions. Then again it is appealing to overclockers mostly.
Always favoring Asus, ASRock and Gigabyte ~
No matter how less differences between each board ~
MSI Motherboard , the reviewer never have comment ~
I am a MSI brand fans , I admitted it , but the reviewer seems like ignored MSI's afford.
After working in retail for a while you tend to see trends with motherboard manufactures. From what I have seen, Asus tends to have the overall most stable quality with the least amount of issues and very decent support for BIOS updates for newer CPU support beyond most.
ASRock has upped their game in recent years and has put more quality into their boards but they also have a lot of features much like Asus since they were once a part of ASUSTek and separated although Asus did put in a bid to buy them back but I haven't seen any word from them.
Gigabyte is a hit or miss. Their high end seems very good but their low end sometimes lacks.
Then there is MSI. I am not a fan of MSI. The TwinFRZR branded GPUs had a lot of issues, mainly the fans going out very fast. But I think there are two components that kill them for me the most. One was the massive heat issues their X58 boards had with the chipsets on a large number of their boards. We had a X58m from MSI that was idling at 58-60c for the chipset in BIOS doing nothing and we RMAed it. Came back with the same problem. Due to this heat most of the MSI X58 builds we did would lose SATA and come back sometimes on reboot. Had one customers machine that we went from a ATX X58 to a X58M and finally swapped them to an Asus which the chipset idled around 35c which is normal.
The second for me was the BIOS updates on a lot of their boards. Now I can't say on their high end but recently MSI stopped allowing you to update through the BIOS and instead only offered a Windows based app to update and that is just bad. If you bought a MSI with a CPU and it didn't support it, rather then being able to drop an older CPU in and flash it, you have to do an entire build including Windows installation to do it which is a waste of time. USB via BIOS is the best method and now Asus even has the ability to do it sans CPU so if you bought a CPU that needs a BIOS update, no biggie.
That's what I see of the brands. I tend to stick to Asus as they have always worked for me but I have experienced a lot and the article is fine. Its looks at the important features, as the majority of the software is not needed anyways and just bloat, and grades it from that.
What I want to know is why a ROG Asus board has RealTek sound instead of Asus own sound. RealTek is fine for those who don't care but for real sound Asus/Creative offer way better solutions. Then again it is appealing to overclockers mostly.
Actually myself currently using MSI P45 Platinum, I dont know their new product quality, but my current motherboard work for me for 5-6 years 24 hours operation still running well ~
Even without driver on windows 8 still working well after used windows 8 for sometime ~
I am going to upgrade this to Z87 Mpower in next year ~
Btw my current build by my brother ~
I going to build another setup based on MSI Z87 Mpower ~
My Brother can flash the BIOS well with MSI Live Update ~
It work well ~
Now my setup running stable with latest BIOS ~
Always favoring Asus, ASRock and Gigabyte ~
No matter how less differences between each board ~
MSI Motherboard , the reviewer never have comment ~
I am a MSI brand fans , I admitted it , but the reviewer seems like ignored MSI's afford.
Thanks for correcting me ~
I also didnt read well the review ~
Btw I really proud of being a MSI user ~
Btw I really proud of being a MSI user ~
Following is % of 5 Stars/% of 1 Star / # of Reviews on Newegg for each board:
ASUS MAXIMUS VI FORMULA: 59%/9%/22 Reviews
ASRock Z87 OC Formula: 75%/25%/4 Reviews (not enough reviews to make a determination)
MSI Z87 MPOWER Max: 60%/8%/25 Reviews
GIGABYTE GA-Z87X-UD5H: 53%/32%/19 Reviews
Both the Asus and MSI boards have great feedback scores. The 1-Star % rating tends to be in the low-to-mid teens for motherboards, so these two are showing favorably. The jury is still out on the ASRock, as more reviews are needed to draw a conclusion. I'd question a Gigabyte purchase at this point due to what looks to be higher than normal quality issues.
Following is % of 5 Stars/% of 1 Star / # of Reviews on Newegg for each board:
ASUS MAXIMUS VI FORMULA: 59%/9%/22 Reviews
ASRock Z87 OC Formula: 75%/25%/4 Reviews (not enough reviews to make a determination)
MSI Z87 MPOWER Max: 60%/8%/25 Reviews
GIGABYTE GA-Z87X-UD5H: 53%/32%/19 Reviews
Both the Asus and MSI boards have great feedback scores. The 1-Star % rating tends to be in the low-to-mid teens for motherboards, so these two are showing favorably. The jury is still out on the ASRock, as more reviews are needed to draw a conclusion. I'd question a Gigabyte purchase at this point due to what looks to be higher than normal quality issues.
I would not base my overall decision on newegg & Amazon reviews. I would rather trust professional reviews.
I want SATA Express AND USB 3.1.
I will build my new system AFTER above tech is available plus the 20 nm graphic cards plus the new Intel Broadwell cpu.
I know I have to be patient and wait, but I almost smell them.
That would be a sweet and fast system.