Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

ASRock Z87 Extreme9/ac

Four Z87 Express Motherboards For Three- And Four-Way SLI
By

ASRock hides its two Thunderbolt interfaces under four USB 3.0 ports, maintaining enough room to stick a CLR_CMOS button next to one of them as well. The full-sized DisplayPort connector passes an external signal through to a Thunderbolt port; the HDMI connector can be used for another display.

Both GbE ports interface with Intel controllers to support teaming mode, and ASRock also adds Broadcom’s 802.11ac-capable mini-PCIe card for wireless networking. Those are features that could make the Z87 Extreme9/ac perfect in an enthusiast's principal workstation. We only seem to be missing antenna connectors on the rear I/O panel...

Instead, we get a plastic-faced 5.25” adapter tray, which replaces the firm’s familiar 3.5” USB 3.0 bay adapter, to host internal wireless antennas in addition to a pair of USB 3.0 ports. The bay adapter we knew so well could take a 2.5” SSD internally. In this version, it's able to accept a pair of solid-state drives. But if you want to swap out the internal antennas for high-gain or directional alternatives, you'll have to find yourself a slot adapter for the back of the board. This shouldn't be an issue unless you're fighting for more range.

The second x16 slot is wired directly to the CPU; using it bypasses the PEX8747 PCIe 3.0 bridge and all four corresponding x16-length slots. Though we see four dual-lane pathway switches beneath that slot, ASRock tells us that there's no way to go CPU-direct for x8 and x8 two-way configurations. If you want to use two cards, you instead need to go x16 and x16 using PLX Technology's switch, and slots one and four. The company's bundled SLI bridge supports that spacing arrangement.

Other layout features include a second eight-pin EPS12V connector to feed extra current to the 12-phase voltage regulator (if desired), a second front-panel USB 3.0 header behind the first header at the front edge for easy four-port front-panel configuration, an extra four forward-facing SATA 6Gb/s ports (totaling 10), a second replaceable BIOS I/C, and an extra USB 2.0 port that fits external drives.

Other than the lack of external Wi-Fi antenna connectors, the only insurmountable layout problem is a front-panel audio header that’s a little too far back in the bottom-rear corner to fit the short cables of some cases.

My assumption when I started writing this story was that once the pieces were in place to support three-way SLI, accommodating four cards should be easy. ASRock's Z87 Extreme9/ac doesn’t include a four-way SLI bridge however, instead requiring you to connect the first card to the second, the third to the fourth, and the fourth to the second using separate bridges. This arrangement is illustrated in the company's user manual.

What you do get is a three-way SLI bridge, ten internal SATA cables, and the previously-mentioned bay adapter, which includes two front-panel USB 3.0 ports, an internal Wi-Fi antenna, and support for up to two 2.5” SSDs.

Display all 26 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 25 Hide
    iam2thecrowe , January 3, 2014 12:19 AM
    Am i missing something here? I dont see the point of reviewing 3 and 4 way sli boards and not testing 3 and 4 way sli. Seems rather pointless since any average motherboard will perform well in adobe, productivity etc benches dependent on the cpu....
Other Comments
  • 25 Hide
    iam2thecrowe , January 3, 2014 12:19 AM
    Am i missing something here? I dont see the point of reviewing 3 and 4 way sli boards and not testing 3 and 4 way sli. Seems rather pointless since any average motherboard will perform well in adobe, productivity etc benches dependent on the cpu....
  • 0 Hide
    Crashman , January 3, 2014 12:40 AM
    This was really just about finding any board that supports Nvidia's requirements about how that third card is connected. We found some, I overclocked them, now I have enough data to pick a board for the System Builder Marathon. But that only explains why overclocking took priority!

    After spending two days per board on a "one week" article, I couldn't add more tests. The general benchmark set looks for unintended overclocking/underclocking, power and memory bandwidth issues, so you can see the performance difference attributable to each board's CPU and DRAM configuration differences. It runs from a .bat file, so it didn't add significantly to the article's completion time.

    The PLX bridge that these all share represents the "great equalizer" when it comes to CrossFire and SLI configuration, so that portion of all three boards should be identical. I understand that things that should be the same in theory are occasionally different in practice. My apologies for not having the extra 1-day per board for additional tests.
  • 6 Hide
    iam2thecrowe , January 3, 2014 1:00 AM
    Quote:
    They all use the same PLX bridge, so you would have seen a whole bunch of identical gaming results. The general benchmark set looks for unintended overclocking/underlocking, power and memory bandwidth issues, so you can see the actual performance difference. And there's still an overclocking section.

    These boards had to be tested for general performance and stability like any other boards. The PLX controller is the equalizer when it comes to games.


    I think testing 3/4 way sli would still be valid, as it doesn't always work properly, in the past there have been compatibility problems with certain gpu's/boards/firmware/controllers and certain benchmarks completely failed.
  • 3 Hide
    Kraszmyl , January 3, 2014 1:26 AM
    "internally-mounted external USB 2.0 port for ReadyBoost fanatics" on the asus z87.

    Those have nothing to do with readyboost. The internal usb ports are very common on workstations and you put CAD dongles and equivalent items in them so that you can lock them inside the case and don't have to worry about some one stealing them from the outside or them taking up an outside usb port.
  • 0 Hide
    Memnarchon , January 3, 2014 2:42 AM
    I would love to see Asus Maximus VI Extreme, but it seems ASUS didn't want to give a 2nd board and prefered the Z87 WS....
  • 8 Hide
    markaflias , January 3, 2014 4:09 AM
    Where are the sli/cfx tests ? Non sense
  • 7 Hide
    west7 , January 3, 2014 6:10 AM
    no cfx test i think the review title is misleading
  • 6 Hide
    Traciatim , January 3, 2014 7:26 AM
    where are the sli/crossfire benchmarks and comparisons with traditional non-switched setups?

    Hey guys, we have these awesome new setups for supreme graphics pumping power! Watch it zip files like every other board!
  • 0 Hide
    chumly , January 3, 2014 7:48 AM
    Those heatsinks on the Asus look like the would interfere with large CPU coolers.
  • -3 Hide
    duramax08 , January 3, 2014 7:51 AM
    Why are they still making motherboards with PS/2 connections? Its time to move on, replace those baby's with some USB 3.0!
  • 4 Hide
    SR81 , January 3, 2014 8:18 AM
    Whats the point of a triple SLI/CFX board review and no actual testing of said triple SLI/CFX????!
  • 0 Hide
    Dax corrin , January 3, 2014 9:02 AM
    While fun to read, it's something I could never afford.
  • 0 Hide
    lp231 , January 3, 2014 9:02 AM
    Quote:
    Those heatsinks on the Asus look like the would interfere with large CPU coolers.


    They had the exact same heatsink design for on their P8P67 WS Revolution and P8Z77 WS but in grey not gold.
    Also I thought this review as suppose to be about, is it worth getting a 1150 board that can do full x16/x16 compare to 1150 board that can only do x8/x8. Even the Asus ROG 1150 boards can't do x16/x16.
  • 0 Hide
    Crashman , January 3, 2014 9:38 AM
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Those heatsinks on the Asus look like the would interfere with large CPU coolers.


    They had the exact same heatsink design for on their P8P67 WS Revolution and P8Z77 WS but in grey not gold.
    Also I thought this review as suppose to be about, is it worth getting a 1150 board that can do full x16/x16 compare to 1150 board that can only do x8/x8. Even the Asus ROG 1150 boards can't do x16/x16.
    This was really just about finding any board that supports Nvidia's requirements about how that third card is connected. We found some, I overclocked them, now I have enough data to pick a board for the System Builder Marathon. But after spending two days per board on a "one week" article, I couldn't add more tests.

  • 0 Hide
    RedJaron , January 3, 2014 11:10 AM
    Quote:
    Also I thought this review as suppose to be about, is it worth getting a 1150 board that can do full x16/x16 compare to 1150 board that can only do x8/x8. Even the Asus ROG 1150 boards can't do x16/x16.

    I would like to see something like that as well, but I understand if this review had some time constraints. Perhaps a future article where you can pit one of these boards at x16/x16 against a x8/x8 board and see if there's a notable difference. I wouldn't mind seeing triple-GPU on this against an x8/x4/x4 board, either.

    I do have to ask if it's worth complaining about audio headers and potential short cables on $300+ boards, though. Surely if you're spending this much on a board you're planning on multiple GPUs that need good cooling. That typically means a larger, quality case with adequate cables, not some cheapo box.

    And once again I see ASRock's dearth of PWM fan headers. Or perhaps I'm wrong and the majority of enthusiast builders use external fan controls for the case fans and not PWM.
  • 0 Hide
    Crashman , January 3, 2014 11:31 AM
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Also I thought this review as suppose to be about, is it worth getting a 1150 board that can do full x16/x16 compare to 1150 board that can only do x8/x8. Even the Asus ROG 1150 boards can't do x16/x16.

    I would like to see something like that as well, but I understand if this review had some time constraints. Perhaps a future article where you can pit one of these boards at x16/x16 against a x8/x8 board and see if there's a notable difference. I wouldn't mind seeing triple-GPU on this against an x8/x4/x4 board, either.

    I do have to ask if it's worth complaining about audio headers and potential short cables on $300+ boards, though. Surely if you're spending this much on a board you're planning on multiple GPUs that need good cooling. That typically means a larger, quality case with adequate cables, not some cheapo box.

    And once again I see ASRock's dearth of PWM fan headers. Or perhaps I'm wrong and the majority of enthusiast builders use external fan controls for the case fans and not PWM.
    The cable used to be a big deal on Thermaltake cases, but I complained enough that they fixed them. It's still an issue on some similar cases, perhaps from Thermaltake's ODM? Most recently I had the problem on one of our upper-quality value gaming cases, but before that it was Lian-Li that got called out. So you never really know where it's going to pop up.
  • 3 Hide
    MasterMace , January 3, 2014 7:34 PM
    Can Tom's do an article comparing the 32 PCIe lanes of LGA 1150 vs the 40 PCIe lanes of LGA 2011 in 3 and 4 way SLI, using the 4770k and 4820k, respectively, at the same clock rate?

    I would love to know the performance difference that the extra 8 lanes gives, and I'm sure a lot of people wonder the same thing.
  • 1 Hide
    techfreaky , January 3, 2014 9:31 PM
    where are the gaming benchmarks
  • 0 Hide
    HKILLER , January 4, 2014 1:14 AM
    actually Gigabyte claims that this mother board has 16x16x16 mod(don't know the slot order but i'm pretty sure it can run triple SLI on 16X16X16)...
  • 0 Hide
    urbanman2004 , January 4, 2014 2:02 AM
    TL;DR it all
Display more comments