wage war the more both sides win. Performance will keep increasing while prices stay low. If AMD wasn't gaining on Intel like they are, however slight, Intel's 'extreme editions' would probably be 50% higher to buy. Intel fans, you need a $630 X2...

the JFTC found that one manufacturer was forced to agree to buy 100 percent of its CPUs from Intel; another manufacturer was forced to curtail its non-Intel purchases to 10 percent or less; Intel separately conditioned rebates on the exclusive use of Intel...

FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by pirox on 09/16/03 02:06 PM.</EM></FONT></P>. Intel don't give up ya know. ANyways..since the A64FX has been derived from a server chip as a source INTEL decided to play the same game with p4 XE. So its more like an Xeon MP: See here...

and DIB will push it faster then the opterons for atleast 4 to 8way (a 2.66 can take on a A64, whats 2.93 going to do). When intel gives us this type of hype we complain, but when were talkin AMD we dont - total BS - its just hype. Besides - when Intel...

faces again. AMD never beat Intel like that, ever. Yeah, I can't think of a time when one processor beat another one over the other by such a wide margin. The only exception maybe the server chips. (opteron vs. xeon) Intel said they would have a 20% gain...

P'M's aren't spectactular either.. But according to Apache_Lives and all his Intel Wisdom, Socket AM2 Beta Boards are of quality enough for legit testings, how come the Pentium M boards get stated otherwise? Hmm? It's interesting to see how much Intel Fanboys...

experience (or links for that matter at the moment) but AMD pwns Intel in x64 comparisons. Both Windows and even more so in Linux. dude ask linux 0 he is a programmer AND LOVES THE OPTY Most benchmarks I've seen, AMD gains more than Intel going from 32 bit...