Intel Takes on AMD/ATI, NVIDIA in Graphics. Didn't see this posted anywhere. Your Thoughts?. Didn't see this posted anywhere. Your Thoughts? My peronal opinion is that after years of producing inferior igps for graphics, which in my opinion has...

Intel Takes on AMD/ATI, NVIDIA in Graphics. I can almost see this as a way to squeeze ATI/AMD out of the GPU market to an extent that their CPU sector might suffer even more due to the overcompensation that the GPU sector will have to show to compete w/...

i believe you and your argument, you forget the effect of the high end GPUs to the mid and low-end consumer market. I can´t state numbers or link statistics of it, but it sounds reasonable to say that there are people that buy ATI or Nvidia mid or low-range...

for all those who have have used Nvidia cards for PhysX and ATI cards to render graphics in Windows 7...All that is about to change. Since the release of 186 graphics drivers Nvidia has decided to disable PhysX anytime a Non-Nvidia GPU is even present in...

license agreement with Intel. Previously it was thought that Nvidia has to pay for it. Now they are speculating that Intel just gave it for free in exchange for some graphics patents in return. Nvidia may have Intel Pentium 4 licence for nothing Yousuf...

Just in case you were wondering, it will be based on Nvidia's Intel Chipset and Nvidia graphics boards. :wink: But anyone with half a brain can see that Intel is now the computing King again. For everything. nVidia for a graphics solution just makes sense...

it's that you have to run a fast one to get Ultimate to work. And I understand the pros and cons of why that is. the OS is using the GPU to do some cool tricks if you have the juice to take advantage of it. So, they'll continue to dominate 95% of the space...