new array and change the partition ratios accordingly to account for the drive capacity difference? Or do I need to break the Array and copy one of the older pair drives to one of the newer pair drives using some other method? IE external drive cloning hardware...

solve the problem... - i did a lowlevel format on the "not anymore accepted drive" -> no systemdata etc on that drive -> [00b846] - i checked the size: the "not anymore accepted drive" was in that array before the crash -> if it...

I would NEVER put my OS drive on a RAID array. NEVER. As I'm sure you've noticed, when (and not if) the driver gets corrupted, not only do you get to repair the array, but reload windows and ALL those programs as well. Also, while RAID 0/10 has wonderful...

does not know how to boot directly from a RAID array under its own control and needs particular drivers installed to do that. But in this case the RAID array is controlled within the LaCie unit. Does it really make itself look exactly like a regular IDE unit...

specific drives as RAID. So what do I do to set up my system as RAID 0, and install Vista 64 on it? I was thinking of setting up the RAID 0, then cloning over my system from the external drive to the RAID array; and then setting up Vista on the RAID array....

you had 4 drives it might still be better to go raid 0+1 than raid 5. not to mention alot of motherboards have very buggy implementations of raid 5. 2 drives in raid 0 are faster than 3 drives in raid 5 anyway. you would be ahead in the game...

drives. 7. How do I setup/partition a level 0 RAID array, and install my OS on it? The easy way: 1) Attach the drives to the RAID controller. Each drive should be master on its own channel (separate cable) for maximum performance. 2) Enter the RAID controller...

the Intel ICH10. I have four Seagate drives attached to this RAID in a 10 configuration. The board hasn't been the best, especially with regard to stability. However, the other day the RAID degraded two of the drives in the RAID 10. The raid was still functional,...

1. I really might need to go array (RAID 0) because intensity pro recommends an array. Actually, it requires atleast 8 HARD DRIVES in one array. That is kinda crazy so I will call black-magic tomorrow to get proper info. If they do require 8 hard-drives in...

SataII doesn't matter until hard drives can catch up to the 150 a second number, which they are not close at all once the cache has to wait on the drive. However, having a SataII motherboard can be nice if you need large raid arrays, because port replication...