to see everything that got canned by intel, especially Tejas. It was suppose to be quad pumped 800mhz FSB, would be nice with Some DDRII-800! Only thing Intel manage to stick with is their Process roadmap. 65nm by the end of 2005 or beginning of 2006 is...

not even on the roadmap part from nV will be right there to reply to a 65nm R600. The thing is this 65nm R600 is being seen at Cebit right now, and by more than just the InQ, with AMD confirming the 'rumour'. Right now there's not much about a 65nm part from...

looks like AMD is on track for 65nm production later this year. . I thought this was a good article. Nice to see AMD moving up and expanding. Competition is good and looks like AMD is on track for 65nm production later this year. Hmm....very...

mind is the biggie. The way I read it IBM is calling the shots. They say when a 90nm chip is coming and AMD seem to follow right behind. IBM says that the roadmap goes 65nm and 45nm on 300 mm wafers. AMD follows right along. So when I see a new AMD chip...

also a question mark beside Nehalem which shows that it's unknown whether or not Nehalem will debut at 90nm. My guess is that it will debut at 65nm, but I might be wrong. Whether this roadmap is accurate or not is anyone's guess. Imgod2u, you are correct....

ATI Roadmap for R600. VR-Zone is reporting no 65nm 2900XT (R650) according to the AMD graphic roadmap. However there will be 55nm gfx cards in the future. . VR-Zone is reporting no 65nm 2900XT (R650) according to the AMD graphic roadmap. However there...

by early 2004, we'll have to be well into 4Ghz processors... (hey, I'm not complaining or anything - isn't that one hell of a roadmap?) Plus, Tejas might be 65nm... Strange, my brain can't even cope with that... Maybe AMD is on to something? Maybe Intel has...