Samsung showing 21" OLED display. Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv () Take a look: <http://www.forbes.com/infoimaging/feeds/infoimaging/2005/01/04/infoimagingafx_2005_01_04_AEF_0402-3533-PRD.KOR.CMP.TLE..html><http://www.hardwarezone.com/news/...

OLED display. Admittedly, the OLED is just a demonstration of their capabilities; its not consumer price-ready yet. Extra emphasis on thinner panels. Samsung showed off a 50 inch OLED display, but admittedly, was no where near price maturity. The price would...

with both of those TVs you will never get as good a picture as a model showing the image natively. What you want is a screen that is at least capable of displaying one format native. In all honesty I would wait 12 - 18 months. Archived from groups:...

people are >>going to do. >>>> heck, I want all four walls the ceiling and the floor lit up ;) >> Then you are waiting for OLED displays. That is the only technology that will be able to do that. Matthew -- Thermodynamics and/...

standard for high definition content, and introduce their OLED display to the world. They simply lack this level of expertise when it comes to their LCD displays. It would have been nice if they had really come out swinging, maybe even start making Plasma again....

not thought of yet.. It is up to the monitor people to produce a display I'd consider tripling (or more) up, but I have confidence we will see nice displays for this sort of thing coming.. With OLED displays very close, there really is not a need for a bezel...

hold that many though, LOL. I probably only realistically need one good monitor and would be better off beefing up the computer itself instead, or saving my money for another 5 years to get an OLED display. Pity there are no 120Hz 30-inch 2560x1600 monitors...