Vista, video card, or TV?. Hello, I just upgraded my system to fully Vista compatible, but kept my old 6800GS for now while I pony up the rest for a 9800 when they come out. I have a small problem though, i'm using a DVI to HDMI cable to a westinghouse LCD...

with other video card drivers (the capture card I had was capture-only. I have a separate video card). The problems Truisys is having may have nothing to do with Vista. Then again, if Truisys is using a digital capture, Vista might require extra fudging...

to, according to Tom's article, not me (which is what I was referencing, not engaging in a bunch personal attacks like you assholes) be moving somewhat towards a more limited hardware model than before. It's not that you can't run a cheap video card on Vista,...

too. I think the big thing for vista is video ram, and 256 is the least you probobly want to run the new interface smoothly. at least 1gb system ram is definetly a must as vista is a diabolic memory monster. please have alook that machine you linked to...

Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo 1.8Ghz or equivalent AMD Athlon X2 64 2.4Ghz •Memory/RAM: 1GB for XP and 1.5GB for Vista•Video Card: 256MB NVIDIA 7900 or 256MB ATI X1900 •Hard Disk Space: 16GB free •Operating System: Windows XP SP3 or Windows Vista...

want to run vista, Trust me. Of late, I find it to be a very bad time to purchase a new video card. Unless you're going for the high end stuff which boils down choices to a few offerings, picking up a mid end card is tough. I guess this always happen when...

who have seen the benchmarking of XP/DX9 vs Vista/DX10, in the October 2007 issue, then you will see that Vista has nothing what so ever to offer the end user. XP blew the benchmarks out of the water over Vista, with Vista and DX10 taking about a 50% nose...