world. Not even the benchmarks are 100 percent accurate every time, run a bench mark 3 times in a row and tell me if you get the same score each time? Barring somebody purposely influencing the the real world test (i.e. exploiting high frame situations...

as a glaring flaw especially on a benchmark, if he had such moral objections to using the patch to level the playing field, he should not have used an obviously broken benchmark in the first place. ~Matisaro~ "The Cash Left In My Pocket,The BEST Benchmark"...

B, it tends to be faster if you're logged on and doing the operation from machine A. dude are those transfer times Real World situations? i calculated each one and they are perfect, in real world situations those times would be mixed and match. but i do see...

world benchmarks in rating these routers. I mean, that is how games are tested. From what I've seen so far, the theoretical benchmarks are deceptive. I suggest another set of comparisons and charts: actual sustained eMule upstream performance. Downstream...

should be done with three (who has the time or the resources?) different versions of the software? One nonoptimized version, and one intel optimized and one AMD optimized. Perhaps its not that difficult to make benchmarking software in three different versions?...

a 1.4 factor increase in FPS among all major games? You have to remember that there are different metrics for FPS as well: average FPS, max FPS, min FPS, % FPS increase just to think of a few. That does sound dodgy, but we will see. I want real world benchmarks...

a 4850X2 and a 4850 in TriFire. The benchmarks are taken from the following 4 games: Devil May Cry 4, Half-Life 2, Race Driver: GRID, and Far Cry 2. As much I would like to do this for a living, I did not have all the time in the world to get these benchmarks...