for the new 5770 and 5750 cards. The 5750 performs more along the lines of a 4850 and the 5770 is slower than a 4870 1GB. I wouldn't use a 5770. looked at the stuff you gave me in the toms review the 5770 is rated ok. maybe not as fast as the 4870...

the 4870 is DX10.1 4870 . Yeah, spending a little extra for an HD5770 would be a good call. Sorry, that was a typo, I meant to say 5750. But yeah, 10 bucks more for a 5770 is a good price/performance upgrade. The 5770 is nearly as fast as the 4870 and 260...

as you have selected the O/C HD 4890, the difference would be even more... okay man thanks alot i made up my mind i have decided to get the 4890 Toxic its waaay to fast for the 4870 Vapor-X thanks alot again ^^ :hello: :) Glad I could help... I hate...

is stranger, because i used this same driver you say for me download in my Vista. Look CCC: Lol, my mistake. That's not it then. thats slow performance in all places is making me crazy ... see my old Geforce 8800 Ultra more fast the 4870 X2 is sad...

and while Im at it whats better the 3870 HD or the 4870 HD? just wondering - 'cause I remember reading like 2 months ago that the 3870 HD is the fastest on the planet. 8800 gt beats 1950 x pro 4870 beats all by a wide margin Are you sure the 8800GT beats...

SDRAM at 1066MHz 330-0915 1 Dell Consumer Multimedia Keyboard 320-7810 1 No Monitor 320-7889 1 1024MB ATI Radeon HD 4870 GDDR5 341-8517 1 640GB Serial ATA 2 Hard Drive 7200 RPM 421-0084 1 Microsoft Windows Vista SP1 Home Premium 64-Bit Edition Edition...

had, seems to about right. There is ingrease in speed, but not huge. The GTX280 is good gard for well ventilated case, if you can afford it. It's much faster than upcoming 4870, that should be as fast as 3870 X2, but maybe not as fast as 4870 X2 in all cases,...

it won't be as fast. Close, but it won't be as fast. The 4870 is supposed to stop being made as soon as the 4890 comes out. I'm not sure I believe this. The 4770 will be $99, the 4850 will be $130-150, the 4870 512MB will be $160-$200, the 4870 1GB will...

a lower clock. It wont be as fast as a 4870 but the upgrade from gddr3 to gddr5 isn't cheap either. It should sit in between both in price, closer to the 4870 while performing close to a 260gtx 192 core probably. ^That is a possibility, but remember the...

believe that the only reason 4870 managed to stay close to the 280 and as good as the 260 is because the nvidia cards have the added support for physx and CUDA. Look at it this way: for the same price of the 4870 you can get a 260 AND a physx card :) Yeah...