Amazon says its data centers consume only 0.075% of the water Americans use for watering their lawns and gardens — company also boasts of its improvements in water efficiency

water sprinklers irrigating a lawn
(Image credit: Getty Images)

Data center water use is one of the hot topics right now in the U.S. and is one of the primary reasons why such projects are being blocked across the nation. However, Amazon claimed that it’s improving its water efficiency and that it uses the least amount of water on a per kWh basis among the AI tech giants, including Microsoft, Google, and Meta. Aside from that, it also said that despite using 2.5 billion gallons of water across the world in its data centers, it said that that amount is still a fraction of what other industries in the U.S. are using annually.

Amazon pointed at EPA data from 2017 that said Americans use 9 billion gallons of water daily just for landscape irrigation. This amounts to nearly 3.3 trillion gallons of water every year just for watering plants and gardens and doesn’t even include the irrigation needed for food production. This makes its 2.5-billion-gallon water consumption a literal drop in the bucket, amounting to just 0.075% of water used for keeping gardens green and thriving.

These gardens, however, have a direct benefit in that they could potentially keep ambient temperatures lower (versus an all-cement environment) and add to the aesthetics of the immediate area — the only question is how many people these developments benefit. Moreover, many new data centers in the U.S. are reportedly being built in areas suffering from water issues. While the overall data center water consumption might seem small if you look at the larger picture, we still cannot turn a blind eye to its potential effects on the local community.

Latest Videos From

For example, a Meta data center has allegedly caused a Georgia town’s deep-well water source to muddy — a sign that the level of the local water table is hitting low levels, allowing mud to be siphoned by the residents’ water pumps. Another site reportedly sucked 29 million gallons of water in 15 months, which caused low water pressures for residents. Reports like these make it harder for other data center projects to secure permits from local governments to start construction, especially as communities fear that these issues could happen in their area, too.

Amazon boasts water efficiency improvements

As the pushback against data centers’ egregious resource consumption has become front-and-center in many permitting fights, Amazon is showing that it’s taking steps to reduce its water consumption and claims that it’s on track to being “water positive” by 2030. It achieved this by implementing innovations in its data centers to reduce water use without reducing performance.

The company says that it mostly uses air cooling for its data centers, which uses up a lot less electricity compared to water cooling. But when ambient temperatures rise, it switches to Direct Evaporative Cooling, with the company spraying water on an absorbent medium, which the company describes as “a sophisticated, giant sponge,” and then runs the hot air through it to reduce temperatures by five to 10 degrees. It says that this is more power efficient than using chillers, reducing power use by about 20% to 25% during the hottest time of the day when power usage by other users is at its highest, too.

It also said that it raised the temperature thresholds in its data centers. While this meant that its servers ran hotter compared to previous years, it didn’t impact on the longevity of their hardware and they were still able to deliver the same amount of computing power as before. Through trial and error, the company discovered that it could keep running its servers using air cooling only, with its water-cooling systems only kicking in once the ambient temperature reaches 85 degrees F (or more than 29 degrees C). This resulted in 50% reduction in water use, says Amazon water specialist Beau Schilz.

Efforts like this are essential for data center operations to become sustainable. After all, despite the pushback against new data center projects, we cannot forever put a moratorium on them as AI’s demand for compute is increasing. But until AI hyperscalers can earn back the trust of the people and prove that they can build infrastructure without increasing costs for everyone else and hoarding the resources that communities need for their survival, then they can only expect opposition to continue.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • ezst036
    This is actually a quite brilliant deflection propaganda from Amazon.

    See, they use more than we do and we are essential! Who needs green lawns!
    Reply
  • hwertz
    so,
    a) People in the desert, or wherever when there's a drout, are told to quit watering their lawns then stop. Will data centers stop using water in those times? Oh they won't huh?

    b) Amazon's percentage of water use is for themselves alone, for their exising data centers, while all these providers plan to greatly expand the amount compared to now. Almost 0.1% compared to what people use on lawns and gaedens actually sounds pretty high to me given this is for a single service provider.

    c )If data centers used minimal water, this concern wouldn't even be a thing. If Amazon's use way less, great, but others presumably aren't doing this. Why aren't they just using closed loop cooling anyway? If I bought water cooling for a PC, I don't hook one end to the faucet and the other run to the drain.
    Reply
  • ggeeoorrggee
    The non-rebuttal to buttress the whataboutism argument reminds me of people who justify massive tax cuts for the rich by quoting some meaningless version of “the top x% of earners pays y% of all taxes” or some similar nonsense. Without backing context of how much income that x% makes as a percentage of the whole, the statement lacks a true conclusion.

    Without a figure how much space data centers occupy vs the green space, the comparison is useless. That’s even before we get to the argument that lawns are contributing positively to the ecology, not negatively. Admittedly, still far from the best use of growing space., but still greener.

    A more apt comparison would be how much water does a data center consume per whatever-unit compared to commercial business space unit. I think the results would look poor in any analysis and they know it.
    Reply
  • SmokyBarnable
    Amazon is successfully highlighting the enormous US water waste on grass lawns, relics from the 18th century that are ecological dead zones. They should add golf courses to their calculations. But for adding gardens to this balance sheet, Amazon can f*ck right off. As if nourishing beauty and insects and birds is some frivolous pursuit and data centers are the height of humanity.
    Reply
  • The Historical Fidelity
    Why can’t these data centers use closed loop water coolers like the rest of us.
    Reply
  • TechieTwo
    So in plain English, Amazon is consuming 2,147,639,281,964,370 gallons of H2O per day. Why would anyone be concerned? /s :(
    Reply
  • tntdyno
    yea no.
    water going to the lawn returns to earth. Period.

    water going thru datacenters must be treated and recycled in a way to be useable again. Requiring power and resources... generating pollution.

    they are not the same.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    hwertz said:
    People in the desert, or wherever when there's a drout, are told to quit watering their lawns then stop.
    in fact the state will actively pay you to rip out your grass in many of those locations and repalce it w/ fake grass to save on water usage.
    it said that that amount is still a fraction of what other industries in the U.S. are using annually.
    just because is doing less bad than doesn't mean its a good thing..it means both are still bad and need change to happen across board.

    fact is they should require data center corpos to HEAVILY invest in the utilities they require to function scaling on the size of the corpo parent company.

    Wanna use lots of water? build up desalination sites to amount you will need.Wanna use lots of power? Build up the national grid to add at least as much as you plan to use & if you cross that you are requried to build up 2x your usage with compounding punishments for going over again.

    if the leeches of society wanthoard the resources they should be required to invest in those fields.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    This article conveniently ignores the water used during power-generation, needed to actually run the data centers. In another recent article, that was estimated at 54% of a typical datacenter's total water usage.
    https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/most-new-us-ai-data-centers-are-going-up-on-drought-land
    Also, semiconductor fabrication is happening in some areas with water scarcity, and datacenters are driving demand for those chips. That same article estimated the impact at 42%.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    tntdyno said:
    yea no.
    water going to the lawn returns to earth. Period.
    Well... a lot of it evaporates. Also, the return trip to the water table is very slow, hence why lawn watering is one of the first things to get restricted or banned during droughts.

    tntdyno said:
    water going thru datacenters must be treated and recycled in a way to be useable again.
    That assumes they're not using evaporative cooling, which a lot of datacenters do for sake of energy-efficiency.

    tntdyno said:
    Requiring power and resources... generating pollution.
    Not using evaporative cooling requires more power. Also, in a closed-loop cooling system, I think you don't normally have to do much in the way of treatment, once the system is up and running.
    Reply